On 01/28/18 08:29, Andy Lemin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> That's ok. This list is a place for open and honest conversation :)
>
> My reaction was towards the article trying to say that BSD's are dying, rather than against Van Sprundle or his research.
>
> I've read through his slides before and I skim through the erratas each upgrade, but this article tries to bloat the truth in my eyes.
>
> So I'm asking the question as to where the reality lies as it stands today?
>
> Linux is such a moving target with so much unnecessary complexity with SystemD, that in the bigger picture we can place far more more trust in the BSD's.
>
> It's also a pretty serious allegation to cite so many vulnerabilities as still being unfixed today? Is this true?
>
> Thanks for your reply :)
>
> A
>
>
>
> Sent from a teeny tiny keyboard, so please excuse typos
>
>> On 28 Jan 2018, at 14:11, Hiltjo Posthuma <hiltjo@codemadness.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 12:56:26PM +0000, Andy Lemin wrote:
>>> Really, did he actually post any real vulnerabilities to OpenBSD!
>>>
>>> This article has to be govt propaganda..
>>>
>>> https://www.csoonline.com/article/3250653/open-source-tools/is-the-bsd-os-dying-some-security-researchers-think-so.amp.html
>>>
>>> I was laughing with tears when I read this..
>>>
>>> OpenBSD is the only OS I place any real trust in <3
>>>
>>> Is probably the only OS they can't hack.
>>>
>>> And SystemD makes me want to both cry and scream at the same time.
>>>
>>> A
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from a teeny tiny keyboard, so please excuse typos
>> Hey,
>>
>> Maybe I shouldn't reply, but I feel this is insulting to the amazing work of
>> Van Sprundel. I've also seen better nuanced articles about the same
>> presentation talk.
>>
>> Sources:
>> - https://www.openbsd.org/errata60.html (the batch of patches on August 3 2017).
>> - http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20170804053102
>> - Slides: https://media.defcon.org/DEF%20CON%2025/DEF%20CON%2025%20presentations/DEFCON-25-Ilja-van-Sprundel-BSD-Kern-Vulns.pdf
>> - https://www.openbsd.org/errata56.html (earlier work).
>>
>> Please do more research before you post.
>>
>> --
>> Kind regards,
>> Hiltjo
Interesting read. Thanks for sharing.
No comments:
Post a Comment