Re: NEW: devel/cmark

On Thu Aug 02, 2018 at 05:36:13PM +0200, Jan Klemkow wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> I also worked on an cmark port. I took your tar ball and fixed all
> comments Stuart pointed out. Just, the MAINTAINER field is still unset,
> But, a portscheck run does not require this field.
>
> I replaced the manual DISTFILE and MASTER_SITE handling by the GH_*
> variables, moved it to category "textproc" and correct some spacing.

That wasn't the way to go and the spacing was fine -- trust me or use
vim. Please see my traball.

>
> Hopefully that helps you. I also need this tool for a private project
> of mine.

Would you like to take MAINTAINER?

>
> bye,
> Jan
>
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 10:41:30AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2018/08/02 11:03, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > > please find attached a small dependency for the upcoming
> > > multimedia/mkvtoolnix update. All tests are passed on amd64.
> > >
> > > pkg_info:
> > > Information for inst:cmark-0.28.3
> > >
> > > Comment:
> > > CommonMark parsing and rendering library and program in C
> > >
> > > Required by:
> > > mkvtoolnix-25.0.0-no_x11
> > >
> > > Description:
> > > cmark is the C reference implementation of CommonMark, a rationalized version
> > > of Markdown syntax with a spec.
> > >
> > > Maintainer: The OpenBSD ports mailing-list <ports@openbsd.org>
> > >
> > > WWW: https://commonmark.org/
> > >
> > > Ok? Comments?
> >
> > textproc or converters would seem better than devel?
>
> Fixed.

Yes, I'm fine with textproc makes more sense then devel.

>
> > $ cat distinfo
> > SHA256 (0.28.3.tar.gz) = rMmGhdPBtRX/eHrHyZQYja2vKKLXAMEMEiHaQZm64fw=
> > SIZE (0.28.3.tar.gz) = 229391
> >
> > Please rename that to something sensible via the DISTFILES=...{...} mechanism.
>
> This is also fixed.

All comments packed in the new tarball.