Hi!
I tested the port on amd64:
- The build is fine
- Installed the -nox package
- Started downloading a torrent
- Installed the main package on top of that, no errors.
- The download has been finished properly.
- Deinstalling caused no issues as well.
I met the same segfaults at exit that Elias mentioned earlier with
the Qt interface, but it doesn't affect the stability of the program
itself.
As a user, it's fine for me.
Charlène.
On Fri, 31 Aug 2018 16:44:35 -0300
Elias M. Mariani wrote:
> Sorry for pinging,
> Just a small change to the README of qbittorrent-nox, tweak from
> Charlene Wendling.
>
> Cheers.
> Elias.
>
> 2018-08-28 16:34 GMT-03:00 Elias M. Mariani <marianielias@gmail.com>:
> > Separate ports sharing the same parent folder (net/qbittorrent) it
> > is then.
> >
> >
> > 2018-08-27 20:04 GMT-03:00 Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org>:
> >> On 2018/08/27 19:30, Elias M. Mariani wrote:
> >>> Yes, but in this case they are built separately and the do not
> >>> share any files.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers.
> >>> Elias.
> >>>
> >>> 2018-08-27 18:14 GMT-03:00 Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org>:
> >>> > On 2018/08/27 15:17, Elias M. Mariani wrote:
> >>> >> Also if someone could check if I'm using correctly the FLAVORS.
> >>> >> The port creates 2 packages that are built separately:
> >>> >> - qbittorrent (Qt5 + web interface)
> >>> >> - qbittorrent-nox (web interface only)
> >>> >> My doubts come when using the PLIST when all the files are
> >>> >> different. (I think that is OK but getting feedback doesn't
> >>> >> hurt...)
> >>> >
> >>> > That would usually be done a single build (i.e. get rid of the
> >>> > flavour, split it in the packaging stage instead using
> >>> > MULTI_PACKAGES and PLIST-main and PLIST-nox).
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >> Multiple flavours are for when you build mostly the same files with
> >> different options. You can skip some files for certain flavours,
> >> but when there is no overlap at all, that is not the situation
> >> flavours are meant to deal with.
> >>
> >> Can you get both of them to build in a single run? If so,
> >> MULTI_PACKAGES. If not, separate ports (can share a parent
> >> directory and some scaffolding via Makefile.inc).
> >>
No comments:
Post a Comment