Marc Espie:
> > I'm more inclined to remove USE_LLD again.
> > What actual use do you envision for either USE_LLD=Yes on !clang
> > or USE_LLD=No on clang archs?
>
> the vmm bios ? doesn't it require some kind of weird 16 bit support.
That's a singular case that can be handled by passing in LD=ld.bfd
if we can't find a solution with lld.
Once we get over the Mesa blocker, I need to talk sthen@ into doing
an i386 bulk build with lld. I expect some additional fallout
compared to amd64 due to crufty non-PIC asm code, but should anything
turn up that can't be made to work with lld, it will likely be a
candidate for deletion.
I don't exactly forsee a use for USE_LLD on non-x86 either.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de
No comments:
Post a Comment