On 2018/11/28 18:33, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> That could be a solution. But if you do that, why don't you attach the
> routes to a routable address in the first place?
>
> Why is ospfd(8) not doing that?
It's how the OSPFv3 protocol works for IPv6 addresses, it doesn't know
the globally-routable address for the interface (AFAIK it doesn't even
*need* a globally routable address on the interface - can just have
link-locals there and one global address, e.g. just on a loopback
address).
No comments:
Post a Comment