Saturday, January 05, 2019

Re: UPDATE: x11/i3

On 2019/01/05 10:55, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> A general question: I would like to port a i3 with gaps[1], should we go
> with a second port (i3-gaps) of should we improve x11/i3 with patches?
>
> RS
>
> [1]: https://github.com/Airblader/i3/tree/gaps

That looks like it should be a separate port. I think ideally it
shouldn't conflict with i3, so it's possible to try it out more easily?

No comments:

Post a Comment