On 8/3/19 8:02 AM, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 02 2019, Brian Callahan <callab5@rpi.edu> wrote:
>> Hi ports --
>>
>> The latest sparc64 build shows that x11/gnome/gedit fails to build. See [0].
>> This is because it is using base-gcc and the codebase uses C99
>> constructs without using the -std=c99/gnu99 flags. Clang doesn't need
>> this because it defaults to C99.
>>
>> If we add the -std=c99 flag, then
>> base-gcc is happy and it's a no-op for clang.
> gcc ang clang default to -std=gnu$something, that's what we should
> prefer to avoid hiding useful compiler and platform features.
>
> clang defaults to -std=gnu11 so your diff isn't a no-op.
>
>> Build tested only on amd64 by forcing CC=gcc. But it does build (and the
>> build works).
>>
>> OK?
> Not ok.
>
> I'd rather use
>
> COMPILER = base-clang ports-gcc
>
> in gnome projects because they tend to use the latest shiny stuff,
> including C11; and ports-gcc also defaults to -std=gnu11 since the
> update to gcc8.
>
> Maybe that's something that we should extend to all gnome ports, I see
> I have an M in gnome.port.mk but it needs to be tested first.
>
> So here's a simple diff below, does it fix your problem? If so, ok?
> cc'ing Antoine and Jasper (maintainers)
*shrugs* that's fine by me. We already do that kind of stuff for things
like qt5 ports.
~Brian
>> ~Brian
>>
>> [0]
>> http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net//sparc64/2019-08-01/x11/gnome/gedit.log
>
> Index: Makefile
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/x11/gnome/gedit/Makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.163
> diff -u -p -r1.163 Makefile
> --- Makefile 7 Jul 2019 11:20:52 -0000 1.163
> +++ Makefile 3 Aug 2019 11:50:25 -0000
> @@ -16,6 +16,9 @@ WANTLIB += gio-2.0 girepository-1.0 glib
> WANTLIB += gspell-1 gtk-3 gtksourceview-4 intl m pango-1.0 pangocairo-1.0
> WANTLIB += peas-1.0 peas-gtk-1.0 pthread xml2
>
> +COMPILER= base-clang ports-gcc
> +COMPILER_LANGS= c
> +
> MODULES= devel/dconf \
> devel/meson \
> lang/python \
>
>
No comments:
Post a Comment