Friday, October 04, 2019

Re: jq: Use rerolled distfile

On 2019/10/04 14:04, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> Apparently upstream rerolled the 1.6 tarball since our recorded size
> does not match, thus the port falls back to our own copy.

Please either use DISTFILES=filename{url}sufx format or a subdirectory,
rather than clobbering an existing distfile which causes problems for
bulk builds (especially if doing current and -stable from the same files).

No comments:

Post a Comment