Thanks Solene,
I did pkg_add -u && pkg_add firefox and it still failed. At one point
the -u complains of a "loop" and asks me if I want to proceed anyway
[n,y,a] so I select "a". After completion pkg_add -u the pkg_add firefox
still fails.
You pointed out that you don't see atk-1, and I see that I am confusing
the contents of the package with the pkg_name. So that's one step.
Now if I just try to install atk I get:
farm# pkg_add atk
quirks-3.187 signed on 2020-05-19T14:41:48Z
Can't install atk-2.32.0 because of libraries
|library glib-2.0.4201.2 not found
| /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.4200.6 (.libs-glib2-2.54.3p1): bad major
| /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.4201.0 (glib2-2.56.3p0): minor is too
small
|library gobject-2.0.4200.9 not found
so then if I try to install glib I get:
farm# pkg_add glib
quirks-3.187 signed on 2020-05-19T14:41:48Z
Can't find glib
Obsolete package: glib (outdated and/or no longer required by other ports)
So it this a dead end? And maybe I have to at least try to update to 6.6
stable?
I agree that these steps are a kind of a resistance to just going to 6.7,
but the failure patterns are instructive to learning useful lessons, so
that's why I think they are of some value. And maybe some value for
others who scan the list for explanations.
Regards,
Austin Hook
austin@hook.org
austin@computershop.ca
On Wed, 29 Jul 2020, Solene Rapenne wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 09:36:38 -0600 (MDT)
> Austin Hook <austin@hook.org>:
>
> > Probably got my packages messed up at some point, and should just stop
> > doing endless "upgrades", and start clean with 6.7, but for learning
> > purposes and perspective, would appreciate tips on why doing a pkg_add of
> > firefox under 6.6 would fail, while looking for a version of atk that that
> > is not in the packages for 6.6?
> >
> >
> > farm# pkg_add firefox
> > quirks-3.187 signed on 2020-05-19T14:41:48Z
> > Can't install firefox-72.0.2 because of libraries
> > |library atk-1.0.21809.3 not found
> > ...
> >
> > But looking at:
> >
> > https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/6.6/packages/amd64/
> >
> > I only see: atk-2.... and no atk-1....
> >
> > -------------------------- <clip> ----------------------
> > at-spi2-core-2.32.1.tgz 12-Oct-2019 06:06 258681
> > atari800-4.1.0.tgz 12-Oct-2019 06:06 408617
> > atf-0.18p3.tgz 12-Oct-2019 06:06 1129085
> > atk-2.32.0.tgz 12-Oct-2019 06:06 461597
> > atk2mm-2.28.0.tgz 12-Oct-2019 06:06 1238387
> > atlas-0.4.3.1p10.tgz 12-Oct-2019 06:06 2360270
> > atomicparsley-0.9.6p3.tgz 12-Oct-2019 06:06 138835
> > --------------------------- </clip> -----------------------
> >
> > I realize that there are dependencies of dependencies going on here. but
> > for perspective, why wouldn't atk-1... exist in the same package
> > repository as the 6.6 version of firefox does, if that version (or
> > probably it's other dependencies) requires it. Wouldn't package testing
> > have failed for firefox when it was tested for 6.6? And if not, why not?
> >
> > Thanks in advance, for any comment.
> >
> > Austin Hook
>
> atk package contains the file
> /usr/local/lib/libatk-1.0.so.21809.3
>
> I don't know why pkg_add firefox doesn't work though, can you try
> pkg_add -U firefox or pkg_add -u && pkg_add firefox?
>
> Firefox 72.0.2 is the package pulled from package-stable and not
> the firefox version that came with 6.6 but it shouldn't fail.
>
> Looking at the package signature, the atk version matches
> the 6.6 atk package.
>
> Signature: firefox-72.0.2,5,@desktop-file-utils-0.24p0,
> @gtk+2-2.24.32p5,@gtk+3-3.24.12,@icu4c-64.2p0,
> @xdg-utils-1.1.3p1,X11-xcb.2.0,X11.17.0,Xcomposite.4.0,
> Xcursor.5.0,Xdamage.4.0,Xext.13.0,Xfixes.6.0,Xi.12.1,
> Xrender.6.0,Xt.11.0,atk-1.0.21809.3,c++.3.0,c++abi.1.0,c.95.1,
> cairo-gobject.2.0,cairo.13.0,fontconfig.13.0,freetype.30.0,
> gdk-3.2201.1,gdk-x11-2.0.2400.0,gdk_pixbuf-2.0.3200.1,
> gio-2.0.4200.9,glib-2.0.4201.2,gobject-2.0.4200.9,
> gthread-2.0.4200.9,gtk-3.2201.0,gtk-x11-2.0.2400.0,icudata.15.0,
> icui18n.15.0,icuuc.15.0,intl.6.0,m.10.1,pango-1.0.3800.2,
> pangocairo-1.0.3800.1,pangoft2-1.0.3800.1,pthread.26.1,
> sndio.7.0,xcb-shm.1.1,xcb.4.0,z.5.0
>
No comments:
Post a Comment