Thursday, October 22, 2020

Re: Issue updating spidermonkey

On 10/22/20 4:31 AM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 06:43:13PM -0400, Brennan Vincent wrote:
>>
>> On 10/21/20 4:40 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>>> On 2020-10-21, Chris Bennett <cpb_misc@bennettconstruction.us> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 08:26:05PM -0400, Brennan Vincent wrote:
>>>>> Updated yesterday from 6.7 to a snapshot, and now:
>>>>>
>>>>> $ doas pkg_add -u
>>>> doas pkg_add -u -Dsnap
>>>>
>>>> You need to do some things different once you change to -current
>>>> snapshots.
>>>> Might also have to wait for -current packages to match the -current
>>>> snapshot sometimes.
>>> -Dsnap does nothing for most of the year. The only thing it's useful for is
>>> pointing to the snapshots directory whdn you're running a kernel with no
>>> -beta/-current suffix (i.e. a release, or snapshot in the short period in
>>> the run-up to release).
>>>
>>>>> quirks-3.458 signed on 2020-10-18T13:56:14Z
>>> This shows that it is indeed looking at a snapshot directory not release.
>>>
>>>>> Can't update spidermonkey-60.9.0v1->spidermonkey78-78.3.1v1: no update found
>>>>> for spidermonkey-60.9.0v1
>>>>> Can't install polkit-0.116p1->0.118: can't resolve spidermonkey78-78.3.1v1
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this expected soon after updating? Do I just need to wait for some
>>>>> inconsistency in the pkg repo to be resolved?
>>> This could either be:
>>>
>>> - a bug in some port
>>>
>>> - a package source that does not have a consistent set of files from one
>>> build (can happen when a mirror is updating)
>>>
>>> First thing to do if this happens is check file dates in the mirror's
>>> directory listing and see if they're consistent (no big jump between the
>>> a* and z* files).
>>
>> Will the URL to check look something like
>> https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/amd64/ ?
>>
>> I checked there; all the files were touched within a 10 minute period.
>>
>> Issue is persisting.
>
> Should be fixed in a current.
> Wait a few days for new packages.
>

Thanks.

What was the issue? Can you link to the diff that fixed it? (Just
curious for my own culture).

No comments:

Post a Comment