On 10/26/21 5:10 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2021/10/26 11:04, aisha wrote:
>> On 21/10/26 02:52PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>>> there were some other comments about the patches in my mail
>>>
>> Oops, sorry. I missed that.
>>
>> I've changed the lmdbxx install function to the simpler one line.
> Thanks. Couple more tweaks; rewrap DESCR as the lines were a bit
> narrow, and install the readme. Updated tgz attached. This is
> OK sthen@ if someone would like to import.
>
>
>> For the usockets port, instead of making a diff to the provided
>> Makefile from upstream, I've changed the port to use a different
>> Makefile.obsd, which is a lot simpler than the upstream one.
>> Upstream Makefile, does not create a shared lib, it manually specifies
>> the C++ library to use (-lstdc++), sets optimzation flags and does
>> not create a pkg-config file, among other things.
>> It was easier to create a simple different Makefile and keep that
>> as a patch. Hopefully thats acceptable.
>> Unfortunately, upstream is not going to accept any changes to their
>> Makefile to standardize it (I've asked them multiple times to even
>> just create a shared library and have been declined).
> Oh I remember about that upstream now. Yes that's probably for the best
> and it's much simpler this way. Will look at getting that in when lmdbxx
> is imported or ok'd.
ping
If someone could test the lmdbxx port and give a second OK it should be
good.
Thanks,
Aisha
No comments:
Post a Comment