On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 11:47:14AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 10:44:09AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >> If people built properly sized machines there would be no problem.
> >
> >That's a little condescending don't you think?
>
> Not at all.
>
> If you don't use a tool as it was intended, you bear the consequences.
>
> *WE* built the tool. *WE* decided how it works. We even documented
> how much resources it typically needs. When people use it
> incorrectly, it is their own damn fault. *THEY* can make adjustments.
>
> But they cannot complain, because they did not pay and even if they
> had there is no warrantee.
>
> There is nothing condescending about telling someone their complaints
> about how something works are falling on deaf ears. I don't give a
> flying damn if KARL is hurting people who don't provide their machines
> with reasonable defaults. It is their own damn fault, and they can
> make manual accomodations for their own (completely stupid, IMHO)
> decisions.
>
> In this modern world is has become *impossible* to complain about
> any technology which doesn't work like you want, companies who take
> money don't give a damn. Here's the shocker: I will not be held
> to a higher standard than that. So Peter, your attitude stinks
> and your suggestion that anything I've said is "rude" rather than "real",
> thgat suggestion of yours is an insult.
OK, I get it you're having a bad day. I'm sorry if I was rude.
BTW do you know any operating systems that aren't BSD, Linux that I can
continue on? Surely you'd be in the know for this.
-peter
No comments:
Post a Comment