On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 09:17:44PM +0200, Tobias Fiebig wrote:
> Heho,
>
> The important part is not 'not adding an additional signature' but
> 'not breaking the previous signature'. As long as you do not fiddle
> with anything in there, things will be fine; But, as you most likely
> do (think: Adding a prefix for the subject like [LISTNAME]), DKIM
> will be an issue (mostly, if there is DMARC in play as well).
>
Thank you. I'm using the mlmmj port to manage the lists. By default it
doesn't modify the headers or the body so the DKIM signature is still
valid.
No comments:
Post a Comment