Monday, December 05, 2022

Re: [sparc64] build of glib2

Fine with me.


Antoine

> On 5 Dec 2022, at 23:22, Theo Buehler <tb@theobuehler.org> wrote:
>
> Latest devel/glib2 doesn't build on sparc64. Various things now seem to
> require a C++11 capable compiler, e.g.,
>
> ../glib-2.74.3/glib/guri.h:92: error: comma at end of enumerator list
> ../glib-2.74.3/glib/guri.h:213: error: comma at end of enumerator list
> ../glib-2.74.3/glib/guri.h:263: error: comma at end of enumerator list
> ../glib-2.74.3/glib/guri.h:338: error: comma at end of enumerator list
>
> ../glib-2.74.3/glib/tests/cxx.cpp: In function 'void test_typeof()':
> ../glib-2.74.3/glib/tests/cxx.cpp:31: error: invalid conversion from 'void*' to 'MyObject*'
> ../glib-2.74.3/glib/tests/cxx.cpp:34: error: invalid conversion from 'void*' to 'MyObject*'
> ../glib-2.74.3/glib/tests/cxx.cpp:54: error: invalid conversion from 'void*' to 'MyObject*'
>
> Part of this is due to this commit
>
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/commit/c19904d6e8951ea774dc298fa793d8b0e506e32d
>
> (I'm not sure how this is supposed to work with older compilers as
> mentioned in the commit message: given how glib_typeof() is defined, it
> requires gcc >= 4.8 or clang or a C++11-capable compiler)
>
> Instead of doing a patching whack-a-mole, it seems saner to switch
> compiler at least until upstream fixes this. The below probably isn't
> quite right since port-lib-depends-check on sparc64 complains about
>
> Extra: estdc++.19
>
> I don't know how to fix that.
>
> Index: Makefile
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/glib2/Makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.369
> diff -u -p -r1.369 Makefile
> --- Makefile 2 Dec 2022 07:28:43 -0000 1.369
> +++ Makefile 5 Dec 2022 21:21:32 -0000
> @@ -32,6 +32,9 @@ MODULES= devel/meson \
>
> MODGNOME_TOOLS= docbook
>
> +# Tests in cpp.cxx now require C++11
> +COMPILER= base-clang ports-gcc
> +
> DEBUG_PACKAGES= ${BUILD_PACKAGES}
>
> # meson: have_bash, needed to install bash-completion snippets

No comments:

Post a Comment