Thursday, February 02, 2023

Re: LAN slow speed transfer

Hi,

thank you Stu for the feedback. Turns out the problem was one of the
cables. It is advertised as 5E, but maybe there is something fishy
with it. Fact is, I bought another, changed it, and now I got
something around 95 MBytes/s of LAN transfer rate.

Best,
Vitor

Em qui., 2 de fev. de 2023 às 13:21, vitmaubra@gmail.com
<vitmaubra@gmail.com> escreveu:
>
> Hello guys,
>
> I'm having problems trying to improve my transfer speed over LAN. I
> can't consistently reach speeds over 10 MBytes/s using iPerf (real
> disk writing transfers with scp render basically the same results).
> Since both server (OpenBSD) and client (Windows) are able to reach
> speeds over 30 MBytes/s downloading files from the internet, I reckon
> there's something to be tweaked on my machines. Any thoughts regarding
> what can be done on the server?
>
> I already tried to no avail what is suggested here:
> http://dant.net.ru/calomel/network_performance.html
>
> Here is there relevant part of my dmesg:
> OpenBSD 7.2 (GENERIC.MP) #5: Wed Jan 11 01:03:12 MST 2023
> em0 at pci0 dev 25 function 0 "Intel ICH10 D BM LM" rev 0x02: apic 2 int 20
>
> Here's my ifconfig output:
> lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 32768
> index 3 priority 0 llprio 3
> groups: lo
> inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
> inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000
> em0: flags=808843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,AUTOCONF4> mtu 1500
> lladdr
> index 1 priority 0 llprio 3
> groups: egress
> media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT full-duplex,rxpause,txpause)
> status: active
> inet 192.168.1.2 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255
> enc0: flags=0<>
> index 2 priority 0 llprio 3
> groups: enc
> status: active
> pflog0: flags=141<UP,RUNNING,PROMISC> mtu 33136
> index 4 priority 0 llprio 3
> groups: pflog
>
> Best,
> Vitor

No comments:

Post a Comment