On 2023-11-04 4:07 a.m., Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 09:03:20PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 08:13:45AM -0400, Brad Smith wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 10:52:39AM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>>>> Doesn't hurt but we probably don't need #ifdef around SYS_getrandom tbh.
>>>>
>>>> Has anyone looked at updating boost recently? It would be a good time in our
>>>> release cycle and I can do an i386 bulk if anyone has a diff handy.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting.
>>> The existing Boost::Context diffs do not apply as is, there were some changes there.
>>> Someone more familiar with this neeeds to look at what needs to be done for i386.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/boostorg/context/commit/2f0b5034b72cbb858849bd744ffb06df04521e5a
>>>
>>> https://github.com/boostorg/context/commit/e286649f08a6312ba3d88aa3eafa179ec3eab163
>>> https://github.com/boostorg/context/commit/0eb42637058741bef2456e0fb165e02d47670c8a
>> Here is an updated diff with the reverted 1.80 ASM.
> That does not look like the correct verisons of the assmebly. What we
> need is the 1.80 assembly *after* the patches in the 1.80 port have
> been applied.
The original patches are still there.
No comments:
Post a Comment