Tuesday, December 05, 2023

Re: FAT names exceeding spec length

People have already explained to you
that 8 + 1 + 3 is less than 255.

Can you kindly shut the fuck up already?


On Dec 05 13:59:11, my25mb@has.im wrote:
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> Absolutely perceived, I haven't counted them. But I counted the 8.3 format for true:
> all the info contained in my ebook title was lost (but experimenting it is no problem).
>
> Now I checked better. Indeed it is Opera web browser that is able to save on Android 11 exceeding
> the name limits:
> Tcl_Tk 8.5 Programming Cookbook -- Bert Wheeler -- 2011 -- Packt -- 9781849512992 -- 9ed273d2c640e4ae4761242a2c28d31c -- Capitan Cloud Ebook Repo.pdf
>
> Android as per your guessing is enforcing the name limits here and there, "enough" well.
>
> However, this the situation. Cutting to 8.3 format or being more conservative?
> That could be the question for you. But indeed I leave the subect to you now.
>
>
> == Nowarez Market
>
> Dec 5, 2023 12:29:30 Anders Andersson <pipatron@gmail.com>:
>
> > Wonder if OP is  actually seeing more than 255 unique "User-perceived
> > characters" or just more than 255 bytes?
>
>

No comments:

Post a Comment