On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 01:09:51 +0100,
Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org> wrote:
>
> - there's a proper distfile so please use that instead of github:
> https://downloads.mitmproxy.org/10.3.0/mitmproxy-10.3.0.tar.gz
Swithced, but this distfile hasn't got tests but I assume it's ok.
> On 2024/06/11 00:03, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
> > ports@,
> >
> > Here a new port security/py-mitmproxy and security/py-mitmproxy_rs which I'd
> > like to send as one part because this two ports are logically linked
> > together and the last one is useless without the first one.
>
> btw, I think generally it would have be helpful to include the set of
> dependencies with the main port too; splitting across half a dozen or so
> emails makes it harder to keep track of them all, and someone testing
> this will need to look at the others.
>
noted, this one required:
www/py-asgiref
www/py-aioquic
archivers/py-lsqpack
devel/py-kaitaistruct
net/py-publicsuffix2
www/py-h2
www/py-hpack
www/py-hyperframe
security/py-service_identity
net/synapse
devel/py-test-forked
archivers/py-zstandard
archivers/py-brotlicffi
> I'll try to look at the others but din't have all that much time atm.
>
thanks!
An updated archive with addressed remarks is attached.
--
wbr, Kirill
No comments:
Post a Comment