On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 10:51:38AM +0100, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 07:24:16 +0100,
> Dan <dan@nnnne-o-o-o.com> wrote:
> >
> > What about permissions over /tmp?
> >
> > I really think you are talking of /tmp over mfs, mh.. in my own
> > flavour (different setup) I have to *very versatilly* adjust permissions
> > to use it. Never mind.. I'm wondering you remain locked there..
> >
>
> Well, I had issue with wrong permission at /tmp on mfs and it lead to
> discover a bug inside emacs' tram mode :)
>
> Neverless this setup with /tmp on mfs seems to have right perssion, at least
> right enough to run X11 and things like Chrome for something like a month.
For reference, we have been using /tmp on mfs on various machines for many
years without issues.
This includes machines with unusual kernel configurations, no swap partition
configured, etc.
Many of our ports building machines put a large pobj directory on mfs, again
without issues.
I also frequently use very large MFS partitions ~50 Gb on a machine with
128 Gb of physical RAM for for mastering BD-R DL discs.
The mfs code has been stable for many releases in all of these scenarios.
No comments:
Post a Comment