Sunday, October 06, 2024

Re: ixl(4) troubles

On Sat, Oct 05, 2024 at 06:57:36PM -0500, matthew j weaver wrote:
> Yes, the firmware was ancient! You'll notice the later boots
> included in my dmesg show the interfaces with the latest firmware:
>
> ixl0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Intel X710 SFP+" rev 0x02: port 0, FW 9.152.77998 API 1.15, msix, 8 queues, address 40:a6:b7:b3:4b:28
> ixl1 at pci1 dev 0 function 1 "Intel X710 SFP+" rev 0x02: port 1, FW 9.152.77998 API 1.15, msix, 8 queues, address 40:a6:b7:b3:4b:29
>
> At any rate, it was the transceivers as predicted by several posters.
>
> My experience matches what deichert@placebonol.com reports:
> The NIC enforces intel-coded only for optical transceivers but not twinax.

I thought that the driver logs this somewhere. If not this is indeed a
nasty trap. Also Intel you suck doing this, I know other vendors do that
as well but you don't need to be as horrible as the rest of the market.

--
:wq Claudio

No comments:

Post a Comment