On 2026/10/22 19:36, Klemens Nanni wrote: > 19.10.2026 18:18, Klemens Nanni пишет: > > Never got any reponse. Can we drop the remaining pea@ maintainer lines? Responses are pretty unusual. > > Unless someone complains about it refusing to start on -current, I'd suggest > > simply removing it. > > I removed gringotts. What should we do with libgringotts? a 13-year-old crypto library based on 20-odd year-old mcrypt isn't a good smell. productivity/osmo can build without it (though loses a backup feature).
Friday, October 23, 2026
Re: [NEW] net/monero & net/monero-lws
Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2026/10/23 02:37, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote: >> On Thu, 22 Oct 2026 21:25:00 +0200, >> David Uhden Collado <daviduhden@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> OpenBSD previously included an outdated version of GNU Assembler >>> in the base system. It now appears to have been removed in favor >>> of LLVM. However, LLVM on OpenBSD does not include llvm-mc, while >>> upstream builds with the GNU toolchain (GCC and binutils). >>> >> >> It is not true, llvm-mc here and we use it. > > not in base, but it is in ports llvm. Hello, Please find attached updated versions of both ports. I have switched from the base system's Clang/LLVM and GNU Assembler to Clang, LLVM and llvm-mc from devel/llvm/22. I have also patched the upstream source code to use OpenBSD's native libedit instead of GNU Readline, removing the dependency on GNU Readline while preserving console editing functionality. These updated tarballs supersede my previous submissions. Thanks, David.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)