Stuart Henderson wrote on Sat, Oct 03, 2026 at 10:04:44PM +0100: > seriously, stop emailing me off-list. > I *will* continue to repost it if you ignore me. > you are being abusive. If this is the same Sebastian Rother who, almost twenty years ago, was one among the grand total of 13 people who ever made it into my email killfile during the 15 years that i used one, then it doesn't look to me as if he learnt much during these two decades. Back then, that other guy posted from @jpberlin.de and already requested things like upgrading Firefox 2 to Firefox 3 for OpenBSD-4.4 and, on other occasions, insulted developers for not taking care of his unreasonable requests, similar to what the new one does now. If it's not the same Sebastian Rother, then the new one should search for Author = sebastian.rother jpberlin.de on marc.info and try to learn from the way that other guy failed at being productive. Either way, both of them ought to stop harassing one of our most hardworking, effective, and helpful ports developers.
Saturday, October 03, 2026
[gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com: AW: [gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com: QWZ Driver and LibreWolf]]
seriously, stop emailing me off-list. I *will* continue to repost it if you ignore me. you are being abusive. qwz commits got retagged because base does not have a multi week lead time like we have in ports. ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 18:50:33 +0000 To: Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org> Cc: ports@openbsd.org Subject: AW: [gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com: QWZ Driver and LibreWolf] And yet I am Right Stuart... Just because you dislike the Messanger wont mean the Message is wrong. Rother Gesendet mit Proton Mail: Ein sicherer E-Mail-Dienst. Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 19:51: > I've had enough of your bullshit Sebastian. Please don't email me again. > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 14:36:04 +0000 > To: "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > Subject: QWZ Driver and LibreWolf > > About what you wrote at Ports@ related to LibreWolf: > > " > what i meant by "there is no time to do that for release" is that > there's no time to do that. > " > > Then ship the QWZ-Driver also! Include it without the Patches for the Memory Managent, PLEASE! "WE HAVE NO TIME", right? > > > Stuart, sometimes you have to make an Exception. > A better Approach would be asking the LibreWolf-Developers to provide an LTS and drop Mozilla and just include the LTS-Version. I generally would just include LTS-Versions at the Ports if possible. But that is being me... > > "this is really too late at this point." > > Since when do "we" have no TIME FOR SECURITY IN OPENBSD?! > Henning even fixed the PF Bug back then within HOURS and the Door for COMMITS where "closed". Kyrill and stsp fixed qwz.... after I bitched both hard... > > STSP even ack'ed Patches wich where simply wrong before and nobody noticed... And now you tell us all: "It is too late for Security"? > > Stuart, you will do it because it is the RIGHT THING TO DO. Otherwise reject all the QWZ-Patches.... Come on: Then be LOGICAL! TOO LATE, SORRY for you owned Boxes and the Bullshit we deliver but "we got Rules".... > Wich where back 20 Years: SECURITY FIRST... > > When did I ever asked you about a Port? And the Arguments are right: The Other Patches also went in so they where all basicly reviewed... > > Leah Rowe is right with her (my assumption, Leah sounds female in German) accusation. BE HAPPY we get People like her! > > Be happy you get People like me who blame the Devs for coding Bullshit in QWZ: but this gets into the RELEASE and they never named me once (yes I wrote Theo, he also did not mentioned me but after I mailed to him they analyzed their fucking Memory Management.. strange...) > > Make your Choice but OpenBSD is right now not in the best shape anyway. > And yes Stuart: I informed them about the qwz Driver, wich is "too late to get Patches in" related to you. If it works there: Make it possible for this Port... WHY WOULD YOU ENDAGER USERS? That makes no Sense.. > > Kind regards, > Sebastian Rother > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 15:07:10 +0000 > To: "info@minifree.org" <info@minifree.org>, > "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > Subject: LibreWolf Port > > I just like to let you know I wrote a "informational" e-mail to Stuart. > > I found the Bugs in the MEMORY MANAGEMENT of the QWZ-Driver and bitched at kyrill and stsp to fix them and Informed Theo and even the german BSI since GENUA-Firewalls base on OpenBSD. > > Related to Stuart all these Patches need to get rejected for Release. > I asked him to make an Exception since sometimes it's required and I reminded him, that 20year before.. the Priority was always: SECURITY FIRST. > > Who remembers OpenBSD 2.1 and co anymore.. :-) > > But the Decision will be his, and his alone. > > I personally thank you for the Port because I think this Project needs support and more Attention since Mozilla became corrupted. Like I would wish Xenoncara-Devs would talk to Libre to unify Patches. > > Is there any LTS Version of LibreWolf? > And maybe we should change (later, next Release) some Config Options so that Hardwaredecoding is enabled by default. It could help to Find Bugs in the Subsystem of OpenBSD but it should be mentioned and also how Users deactivate it. > > I am sure we might find something accidently.. > > Maybe Stuart and you like to watch a little (realy short) Video: > https://www.youtube.com/shorts/b1LFe9E2DeU > > As I was 16 I cracked the Deutsche Bank network. Now as I am older and drink Wine I find Memory Management Issues (after some Alcohol) in the QWZ-Driver because I decided to come back "to the Field". Be it RX, DMA... and they get into the Release but your Patches should not even they're identical to the others... > > So I asked Stuart to include the QWZ-Driver without the Patches (you can read about them as PATCH SETS Kyrill posted at TECH@". > > I find this strange... and I was not even named since they dislike me after I found Bugs in their beloved PF (wich henning@) wich they fixed also even if the CVS was "closed" for Release.... So somehow, sometimes, it worked... as SECURITY FIRST was maybe a Paradigm... > > Stuart: A Deal you can tell Theo: > If I find Bugs I might report them. If Not I simply tell you after each Release about it. Because: QWZ TESTS the QWZ-Driver so SHORTLY before Release? "it's too late", right...? > > Why not playing this game equally... > > Kind regards, > Sebastian Rother > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 15:19:58 +0000 > To: "info@minifree.org" <info@minifree.org>, > "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > Subject: AW: LibreWolf Port > > An information I missed to let you know: > > I never asked Stuart to do this for a Port but I see no Issues. > Not fixing the Bugs Endlagers People and Users. Otherwise I will and would have waited with my Critic about the QWZ-Driver since I was not aware "it's too short" and "No time anymore".... > > Sure you can Patch things later but I was not aware OpenBSd is now days driven like a retarded EA Computer Game who promises you to get "DAY 1 PATCHES".... > > So make your Decision Stuart. You got my Offer... you know I can find Bugs.... > > But rejecting already revied and identical Patches is simply BS.... and not logical. I mean: Ports are anyway maintained POORLY STUART.... Updates are frequently not backported to supported Releases. > > > Sebastian Rother > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:07: > > > I just like to let you know I wrote a "informational" e-mail to Stuart. > > > > I found the Bugs in the MEMORY MANAGEMENT of the QWZ-Driver and bitched at kyrill and stsp to fix them and Informed Theo and even the german BSI since GENUA-Firewalls base on OpenBSD. > > > > Related to Stuart all these Patches need to get rejected for Release. > > I asked him to make an Exception since sometimes it's required and I reminded him, that 20year before.. the Priority was always: SECURITY FIRST. > > > > Who remembers OpenBSD 2.1 and co anymore.. :-) > > > > But the Decision will be his, and his alone. > > > > I personally thank you for the Port because I think this Project needs support and more Attention since Mozilla became corrupted. Like I would wish Xenoncara-Devs would talk to Libre to unify Patches. > > > > Is there any LTS Version of LibreWolf? > > And maybe we should change (later, next Release) some Config Options so that Hardwaredecoding is enabled by default. It could help to Find Bugs in the Subsystem of OpenBSD but it should be mentioned and also how Users deactivate it. > > > > I am sure we might find something accidently.. > > > > Maybe Stuart and you like to watch a little (realy short) Video: > > https://www.youtube.com/shorts/b1LFe9E2DeU > > > > As I was 16 I cracked the Deutsche Bank network. Now as I am older and drink Wine I find Memory Management Issues (after some Alcohol) in the QWZ-Driver because I decided to come back "to the Field". Be it RX, DMA... and they get into the Release but your Patches should not even they're identical to the others... > > > > So I asked Stuart to include the QWZ-Driver without the Patches (you can read about them as PATCH SETS Kyrill posted at TECH@". > > > > I find this strange... and I was not even named since they dislike me after I found Bugs in their beloved PF (wich henning@) wich they fixed also even if the CVS was "closed" for Release.... So somehow, sometimes, it worked... as SECURITY FIRST was maybe a Paradigm... > > > > Stuart: A Deal you can tell Theo: > > If I find Bugs I might report them. If Not I simply tell you after each Release about it. Because: QWZ TESTS the QWZ-Driver so SHORTLY before Release? "it's too late", right...? > > > > Why not playing this game equally... > > > > Kind regards, > > Sebastian Rother > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 15:35:54 +0000 > To: "info@minifree.org" <info@minifree.org>, > "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > Subject: AW: LibreWolf Port > > Latest Patchset for the QWZ-Driver (and look what they "missed" accidently, DMA, RX ..memory Management. But what could get wrong in a Driver wich is in the Kernel, right? It was send on the first of this Month, her Request was send on the second. > > Is this realy the Border Stuart? Then I just mention Bugs on the SECOND of course... or the third of a Month? > > And happy GERMAN REUNIFICATION DAY :) > > Kind regards, > Sebastian Rother > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:19: > > > An information I missed to let you know: > > > > I never asked Stuart to do this for a Port but I see no Issues. > > Not fixing the Bugs Endlagers People and Users. Otherwise I will and would have waited with my Critic about the QWZ-Driver since I was not aware "it's too short" and "No time anymore".... > > > > Sure you can Patch things later but I was not aware OpenBSd is now days driven like a retarded EA Computer Game who promises you to get "DAY 1 PATCHES".... > > > > So make your Decision Stuart. You got my Offer... you know I can find Bugs.... > > > > But rejecting already revied and identical Patches is simply BS.... and not logical. I mean: Ports are anyway maintained POORLY STUART.... Updates are frequently not backported to supported Releases. > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:07: > > > > > I just like to let you know I wrote a "informational" e-mail to Stuart. > > > > > > I found the Bugs in the MEMORY MANAGEMENT of the QWZ-Driver and bitched at kyrill and stsp to fix them and Informed Theo and even the german BSI since GENUA-Firewalls base on OpenBSD. > > > > > > Related to Stuart all these Patches need to get rejected for Release. > > > I asked him to make an Exception since sometimes it's required and I reminded him, that 20year before.. the Priority was always: SECURITY FIRST. > > > > > > Who remembers OpenBSD 2.1 and co anymore.. :-) > > > > > > But the Decision will be his, and his alone. > > > > > > I personally thank you for the Port because I think this Project needs support and more Attention since Mozilla became corrupted. Like I would wish Xenoncara-Devs would talk to Libre to unify Patches. > > > > > > Is there any LTS Version of LibreWolf? > > > And maybe we should change (later, next Release) some Config Options so that Hardwaredecoding is enabled by default. It could help to Find Bugs in the Subsystem of OpenBSD but it should be mentioned and also how Users deactivate it. > > > > > > I am sure we might find something accidently.. > > > > > > Maybe Stuart and you like to watch a little (realy short) Video: > > > https://www.youtube.com/shorts/b1LFe9E2DeU > > > > > > As I was 16 I cracked the Deutsche Bank network. Now as I am older and drink Wine I find Memory Management Issues (after some Alcohol) in the QWZ-Driver because I decided to come back "to the Field". Be it RX, DMA... and they get into the Release but your Patches should not even they're identical to the others... > > > > > > So I asked Stuart to include the QWZ-Driver without the Patches (you can read about them as PATCH SETS Kyrill posted at TECH@". > > > > > > I find this strange... and I was not even named since they dislike me after I found Bugs in their beloved PF (wich henning@) wich they fixed also even if the CVS was "closed" for Release.... So somehow, sometimes, it worked... as SECURITY FIRST was maybe a Paradigm... > > > > > > Stuart: A Deal you can tell Theo: > > > If I find Bugs I might report them. If Not I simply tell you after each Release about it. Because: QWZ TESTS the QWZ-Driver so SHORTLY before Release? "it's too late", right...? > > > > > > Why not playing this game equally... > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > Sebastian Rother > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 16:00:17 +0000 > To: "info@minifree.org" <info@minifree.org>, > "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > Subject: AW: LibreWolf Port > > Ok Stuart, > > YOU JUST ACKNOEDLEDGED AN IMPORT for fucking APACHE.... > AT THE SAME DAY YOU ASSHOLE... > > What do you think PEOPLE DO USE MORE: APACHE or a BROWSER... > But her Update got denied? Now I start to get unfriendly... > > JUST BECAUSE YOU PIECE OF SHIT MAYBE USES APACHE "this is not too late" or what.... > > WHAT ENDAGERS MORE PEOPLE.... "an APACHE we can fix AFTER RELEASE" (YOUR WORDS YOU COWARD!) or a Browser wich People install and then wait until you fapped off at some Linux Code or whatever before you rebuild the patched Package for a BROWSER. > > DO YOUR FUCKING JOB OR LET SOMEBODY ELSE DO IT..... > > Ah it's GIOVANNI and that is why this Update gets in or what? > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=179093897725544&w=2 > > WHAT IS THE DATE STUART.... > > NO KIND REGARDS... just > ROTHER, aka "Rembrandt", Head of HELITH NETWORK.... > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:35: > > > Latest Patchset for the QWZ-Driver (and look what they "missed" accidently, DMA, RX ..memory Management. But what could get wrong in a Driver wich is in the Kernel, right? It was send on the first of this Month, her Request was send on the second. > > > > Is this realy the Border Stuart? Then I just mention Bugs on the SECOND of course... or the third of a Month? > > > > And happy GERMAN REUNIFICATION DAY :) > > > > Kind regards, > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:19: > > > > > An information I missed to let you know: > > > > > > I never asked Stuart to do this for a Port but I see no Issues. > > > Not fixing the Bugs Endlagers People and Users. Otherwise I will and would have waited with my Critic about the QWZ-Driver since I was not aware "it's too short" and "No time anymore".... > > > > > > Sure you can Patch things later but I was not aware OpenBSd is now days driven like a retarded EA Computer Game who promises you to get "DAY 1 PATCHES".... > > > > > > So make your Decision Stuart. You got my Offer... you know I can find Bugs.... > > > > > > But rejecting already revied and identical Patches is simply BS.... and not logical. I mean: Ports are anyway maintained POORLY STUART.... Updates are frequently not backported to supported Releases. > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:07: > > > > > > > I just like to let you know I wrote a "informational" e-mail to Stuart. > > > > > > > > I found the Bugs in the MEMORY MANAGEMENT of the QWZ-Driver and bitched at kyrill and stsp to fix them and Informed Theo and even the german BSI since GENUA-Firewalls base on OpenBSD. > > > > > > > > Related to Stuart all these Patches need to get rejected for Release. > > > > I asked him to make an Exception since sometimes it's required and I reminded him, that 20year before.. the Priority was always: SECURITY FIRST. > > > > > > > > Who remembers OpenBSD 2.1 and co anymore.. :-) > > > > > > > > But the Decision will be his, and his alone. > > > > > > > > I personally thank you for the Port because I think this Project needs support and more Attention since Mozilla became corrupted. Like I would wish Xenoncara-Devs would talk to Libre to unify Patches. > > > > > > > > Is there any LTS Version of LibreWolf? > > > > And maybe we should change (later, next Release) some Config Options so that Hardwaredecoding is enabled by default. It could help to Find Bugs in the Subsystem of OpenBSD but it should be mentioned and also how Users deactivate it. > > > > > > > > I am sure we might find something accidently.. > > > > > > > > Maybe Stuart and you like to watch a little (realy short) Video: > > > > https://www.youtube.com/shorts/b1LFe9E2DeU > > > > > > > > As I was 16 I cracked the Deutsche Bank network. Now as I am older and drink Wine I find Memory Management Issues (after some Alcohol) in the QWZ-Driver because I decided to come back "to the Field". Be it RX, DMA... and they get into the Release but your Patches should not even they're identical to the others... > > > > > > > > So I asked Stuart to include the QWZ-Driver without the Patches (you can read about them as PATCH SETS Kyrill posted at TECH@". > > > > > > > > I find this strange... and I was not even named since they dislike me after I found Bugs in their beloved PF (wich henning@) wich they fixed also even if the CVS was "closed" for Release.... So somehow, sometimes, it worked... as SECURITY FIRST was maybe a Paradigm... > > > > > > > > Stuart: A Deal you can tell Theo: > > > > If I find Bugs I might report them. If Not I simply tell you after each Release about it. Because: QWZ TESTS the QWZ-Driver so SHORTLY before Release? "it's too late", right...? > > > > > > > > Why not playing this game equally... > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Sebastian Rother > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 16:50:13 +0000 > To: "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > Subject: Volume in sndio > > Stuart, > > Even after my Critic I might got a very private Question. > I tried to read and understand sndio and it took me some while. > > Issue is: Another happy OpenBSD User but his left ear has Issues and he asked me to make the Sound louder (on the left Channel speficially of course). > > This would be the correct Code: > # Oder den linken Kanal relativ um 10% anheben > sndioctl output[0].level=+0.1 > > Could you maybe talk internally to get such an Example into the Manpage? > > Sure not everyone needs it but if you need it: I had also to read it up and such an easy Example could maybe get included. There other Examples included in the Manpage itself. :) > > No relation to the other e-Mails but it might be helpful for People. > > > > Kind regards, > Sebastian Rother > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 16:55:41 +0000 > To: "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > Subject: AW: Volume in sndio > > I just got another Idea: > > WHAT IS TO USE: mixerctl or sndioctl... > > Bot basicly would do the same so the Code can get factored out wich shrinks the Binaries... > > Something like > "doas mixerctl outputs.master=255,200" > Wich gets included into the .login or so but requires further Configs. Why can't a user do it without doas and co for his Session? I see no wy so far... > > So what would be the "right way"? And why are there multiple Paths? :) > > > Sebastian Rother > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 18:50: > > > Stuart, > > > > Even after my Critic I might got a very private Question. > > I tried to read and understand sndio and it took me some while. > > > > Issue is: Another happy OpenBSD User but his left ear has Issues and he asked me to make the Sound louder (on the left Channel speficially of course). > > > > This would be the correct Code: > > # Oder den linken Kanal relativ um 10% anheben > > sndioctl output[0].level=+0.1 > > > > Could you maybe talk internally to get such an Example into the Manpage? > > > > Sure not everyone needs it but if you need it: I had also to read it up and such an easy Example could maybe get included. There other Examples included in the Manpage itself. :) > > > > No relation to the other e-Mails but it might be helpful for People. > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > Sebastian Rother > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 16:58:19 +0000 > To: "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > Subject: AW: Volume in sndio > > I do not get it likely. sndio can do Multiplexing so a per Session is basicly possible. > > I just see Solutions for SYSTEMWIDE CHANGES, wich is not wanted.... > > In Question you lack Music: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqvckWG2fCU > Canon in D [Original Version] (J.C. Pachelbel). > > You will enjoy it. ;) > > > Thanks Stuart! > > Kind regards, > Sebastian Rother > > Gesendet mit Proton Mail: Ein sicherer E-Mail-Dienst. > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 18:55: > > > I just got another Idea: > > > > WHAT IS TO USE: mixerctl or sndioctl... > > > > Bot basicly would do the same so the Code can get factored out wich shrinks the Binaries... > > > > Something like > > "doas mixerctl outputs.master=255,200" > > Wich gets included into the .login or so but requires further Configs. Why can't a user do it without doas and co for his Session? I see no wy so far... > > > > So what would be the "right way"? And why are there multiple Paths? :) > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 18:50: > > > > > Stuart, > > > > > > Even after my Critic I might got a very private Question. > > > I tried to read and understand sndio and it took me some while. > > > > > > Issue is: Another happy OpenBSD User but his left ear has Issues and he asked me to make the Sound louder (on the left Channel speficially of course). > > > > > > This would be the correct Code: > > > # Oder den linken Kanal relativ um 10% anheben > > > sndioctl output[0].level=+0.1 > > > > > > Could you maybe talk internally to get such an Example into the Manpage? > > > > > > Sure not everyone needs it but if you need it: I had also to read it up and such an easy Example could maybe get included. There other Examples included in the Manpage itself. :) > > > > > > No relation to the other e-Mails but it might be helpful for People. > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > Sebastian Rother > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > ----- End forwarded message ----- ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 18:56:35 +0000 To: Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org> Subject: AW: [gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com: QWZ Driver and LibreWolf] Just to you: I can proof I told them about the QWZ Driver... even they might deny it. I wrote to GENUA and the german BSI.... So WHAT BULLSHIT.... YOU DENY SECURITY PATCHES YOU FUCKTARD but my HINT WICH LEAD TO PATCHES in QWZ (YES PROOF ME HE HAD ALL THE PATCHES IN THE BACKHAND, kyrill! and that STSP KNOW OF EVERYTHING and they WAITED for the LAST MOMENT to get "MASSIVE PATCHES" into STABLE.... IS THAT NOW NORMAL PROCEDURE IN THE DEVELOPMENT? WHO TESTED The Patches? You by GETTING OFF at Linux Code or what? BUT THEY GET INCLUDED and YOU call me out? GET IT ADDED TO STABLE.... "in time".... the Port... Stuart, It is not me doing Bullshit. It is you... Either you did not know because they where all ashamed to acknowledge it (Reminds me to the PF Bug a little bit...) or you've become dumb. And that I did not FORWARDED IT TO A MAILINGLIST, like you did, just shows I might yet still respect you. You can call me whatever but I was never a Liar... Rother Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 20:50: > And yet I am Right Stuart... > Just because you dislike the Messanger wont mean the Message is wrong. > > Rother > > > Gesendet mit Proton Mail: Ein sicherer E-Mail-Dienst. > > Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 19:51: > > > I've had enough of your bullshit Sebastian. Please don't email me again. > > > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 14:36:04 +0000 > > To: "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > Subject: QWZ Driver and LibreWolf > > > > About what you wrote at Ports@ related to LibreWolf: > > > > " > > what i meant by "there is no time to do that for release" is that > > there's no time to do that. > > " > > > > Then ship the QWZ-Driver also! Include it without the Patches for the Memory Managent, PLEASE! "WE HAVE NO TIME", right? > > > > > > Stuart, sometimes you have to make an Exception. > > A better Approach would be asking the LibreWolf-Developers to provide an LTS and drop Mozilla and just include the LTS-Version. I generally would just include LTS-Versions at the Ports if possible. But that is being me... > > > > "this is really too late at this point." > > > > Since when do "we" have no TIME FOR SECURITY IN OPENBSD?! > > Henning even fixed the PF Bug back then within HOURS and the Door for COMMITS where "closed". Kyrill and stsp fixed qwz.... after I bitched both hard... > > > > STSP even ack'ed Patches wich where simply wrong before and nobody noticed... And now you tell us all: "It is too late for Security"? > > > > Stuart, you will do it because it is the RIGHT THING TO DO. Otherwise reject all the QWZ-Patches.... Come on: Then be LOGICAL! TOO LATE, SORRY for you owned Boxes and the Bullshit we deliver but "we got Rules".... > > Wich where back 20 Years: SECURITY FIRST... > > > > When did I ever asked you about a Port? And the Arguments are right: The Other Patches also went in so they where all basicly reviewed... > > > > Leah Rowe is right with her (my assumption, Leah sounds female in German) accusation. BE HAPPY we get People like her! > > > > Be happy you get People like me who blame the Devs for coding Bullshit in QWZ: but this gets into the RELEASE and they never named me once (yes I wrote Theo, he also did not mentioned me but after I mailed to him they analyzed their fucking Memory Management.. strange...) > > > > Make your Choice but OpenBSD is right now not in the best shape anyway. > > And yes Stuart: I informed them about the qwz Driver, wich is "too late to get Patches in" related to you. If it works there: Make it possible for this Port... WHY WOULD YOU ENDAGER USERS? That makes no Sense.. > > > > Kind regards, > > Sebastian Rother > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 15:07:10 +0000 > > To: "info@minifree.org" <info@minifree.org>, > > "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > Subject: LibreWolf Port > > > > I just like to let you know I wrote a "informational" e-mail to Stuart. > > > > I found the Bugs in the MEMORY MANAGEMENT of the QWZ-Driver and bitched at kyrill and stsp to fix them and Informed Theo and even the german BSI since GENUA-Firewalls base on OpenBSD. > > > > Related to Stuart all these Patches need to get rejected for Release. > > I asked him to make an Exception since sometimes it's required and I reminded him, that 20year before.. the Priority was always: SECURITY FIRST. > > > > Who remembers OpenBSD 2.1 and co anymore.. :-) > > > > But the Decision will be his, and his alone. > > > > I personally thank you for the Port because I think this Project needs support and more Attention since Mozilla became corrupted. Like I would wish Xenoncara-Devs would talk to Libre to unify Patches. > > > > Is there any LTS Version of LibreWolf? > > And maybe we should change (later, next Release) some Config Options so that Hardwaredecoding is enabled by default. It could help to Find Bugs in the Subsystem of OpenBSD but it should be mentioned and also how Users deactivate it. > > > > I am sure we might find something accidently.. > > > > Maybe Stuart and you like to watch a little (realy short) Video: > > https://www.youtube.com/shorts/b1LFe9E2DeU > > > > As I was 16 I cracked the Deutsche Bank network. Now as I am older and drink Wine I find Memory Management Issues (after some Alcohol) in the QWZ-Driver because I decided to come back "to the Field". Be it RX, DMA... and they get into the Release but your Patches should not even they're identical to the others... > > > > So I asked Stuart to include the QWZ-Driver without the Patches (you can read about them as PATCH SETS Kyrill posted at TECH@". > > > > I find this strange... and I was not even named since they dislike me after I found Bugs in their beloved PF (wich henning@) wich they fixed also even if the CVS was "closed" for Release.... So somehow, sometimes, it worked... as SECURITY FIRST was maybe a Paradigm... > > > > Stuart: A Deal you can tell Theo: > > If I find Bugs I might report them. If Not I simply tell you after each Release about it. Because: QWZ TESTS the QWZ-Driver so SHORTLY before Release? "it's too late", right...? > > > > Why not playing this game equally... > > > > Kind regards, > > Sebastian Rother > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 15:19:58 +0000 > > To: "info@minifree.org" <info@minifree.org>, > > "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > Subject: AW: LibreWolf Port > > > > An information I missed to let you know: > > > > I never asked Stuart to do this for a Port but I see no Issues. > > Not fixing the Bugs Endlagers People and Users. Otherwise I will and would have waited with my Critic about the QWZ-Driver since I was not aware "it's too short" and "No time anymore".... > > > > Sure you can Patch things later but I was not aware OpenBSd is now days driven like a retarded EA Computer Game who promises you to get "DAY 1 PATCHES".... > > > > So make your Decision Stuart. You got my Offer... you know I can find Bugs.... > > > > But rejecting already revied and identical Patches is simply BS.... and not logical. I mean: Ports are anyway maintained POORLY STUART.... Updates are frequently not backported to supported Releases. > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:07: > > > > > I just like to let you know I wrote a "informational" e-mail to Stuart. > > > > > > I found the Bugs in the MEMORY MANAGEMENT of the QWZ-Driver and bitched at kyrill and stsp to fix them and Informed Theo and even the german BSI since GENUA-Firewalls base on OpenBSD. > > > > > > Related to Stuart all these Patches need to get rejected for Release. > > > I asked him to make an Exception since sometimes it's required and I reminded him, that 20year before.. the Priority was always: SECURITY FIRST. > > > > > > Who remembers OpenBSD 2.1 and co anymore.. :-) > > > > > > But the Decision will be his, and his alone. > > > > > > I personally thank you for the Port because I think this Project needs support and more Attention since Mozilla became corrupted. Like I would wish Xenoncara-Devs would talk to Libre to unify Patches. > > > > > > Is there any LTS Version of LibreWolf? > > > And maybe we should change (later, next Release) some Config Options so that Hardwaredecoding is enabled by default. It could help to Find Bugs in the Subsystem of OpenBSD but it should be mentioned and also how Users deactivate it. > > > > > > I am sure we might find something accidently.. > > > > > > Maybe Stuart and you like to watch a little (realy short) Video: > > > https://www.youtube.com/shorts/b1LFe9E2DeU > > > > > > As I was 16 I cracked the Deutsche Bank network. Now as I am older and drink Wine I find Memory Management Issues (after some Alcohol) in the QWZ-Driver because I decided to come back "to the Field". Be it RX, DMA... and they get into the Release but your Patches should not even they're identical to the others... > > > > > > So I asked Stuart to include the QWZ-Driver without the Patches (you can read about them as PATCH SETS Kyrill posted at TECH@". > > > > > > I find this strange... and I was not even named since they dislike me after I found Bugs in their beloved PF (wich henning@) wich they fixed also even if the CVS was "closed" for Release.... So somehow, sometimes, it worked... as SECURITY FIRST was maybe a Paradigm... > > > > > > Stuart: A Deal you can tell Theo: > > > If I find Bugs I might report them. If Not I simply tell you after each Release about it. Because: QWZ TESTS the QWZ-Driver so SHORTLY before Release? "it's too late", right...? > > > > > > Why not playing this game equally... > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 15:35:54 +0000 > > To: "info@minifree.org" <info@minifree.org>, > > "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > Subject: AW: LibreWolf Port > > > > Latest Patchset for the QWZ-Driver (and look what they "missed" accidently, DMA, RX ..memory Management. But what could get wrong in a Driver wich is in the Kernel, right? It was send on the first of this Month, her Request was send on the second. > > > > Is this realy the Border Stuart? Then I just mention Bugs on the SECOND of course... or the third of a Month? > > > > And happy GERMAN REUNIFICATION DAY :) > > > > Kind regards, > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:19: > > > > > An information I missed to let you know: > > > > > > I never asked Stuart to do this for a Port but I see no Issues. > > > Not fixing the Bugs Endlagers People and Users. Otherwise I will and would have waited with my Critic about the QWZ-Driver since I was not aware "it's too short" and "No time anymore".... > > > > > > Sure you can Patch things later but I was not aware OpenBSd is now days driven like a retarded EA Computer Game who promises you to get "DAY 1 PATCHES".... > > > > > > So make your Decision Stuart. You got my Offer... you know I can find Bugs.... > > > > > > But rejecting already revied and identical Patches is simply BS.... and not logical. I mean: Ports are anyway maintained POORLY STUART.... Updates are frequently not backported to supported Releases. > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:07: > > > > > > > I just like to let you know I wrote a "informational" e-mail to Stuart. > > > > > > > > I found the Bugs in the MEMORY MANAGEMENT of the QWZ-Driver and bitched at kyrill and stsp to fix them and Informed Theo and even the german BSI since GENUA-Firewalls base on OpenBSD. > > > > > > > > Related to Stuart all these Patches need to get rejected for Release. > > > > I asked him to make an Exception since sometimes it's required and I reminded him, that 20year before.. the Priority was always: SECURITY FIRST. > > > > > > > > Who remembers OpenBSD 2.1 and co anymore.. :-) > > > > > > > > But the Decision will be his, and his alone. > > > > > > > > I personally thank you for the Port because I think this Project needs support and more Attention since Mozilla became corrupted. Like I would wish Xenoncara-Devs would talk to Libre to unify Patches. > > > > > > > > Is there any LTS Version of LibreWolf? > > > > And maybe we should change (later, next Release) some Config Options so that Hardwaredecoding is enabled by default. It could help to Find Bugs in the Subsystem of OpenBSD but it should be mentioned and also how Users deactivate it. > > > > > > > > I am sure we might find something accidently.. > > > > > > > > Maybe Stuart and you like to watch a little (realy short) Video: > > > > https://www.youtube.com/shorts/b1LFe9E2DeU > > > > > > > > As I was 16 I cracked the Deutsche Bank network. Now as I am older and drink Wine I find Memory Management Issues (after some Alcohol) in the QWZ-Driver because I decided to come back "to the Field". Be it RX, DMA... and they get into the Release but your Patches should not even they're identical to the others... > > > > > > > > So I asked Stuart to include the QWZ-Driver without the Patches (you can read about them as PATCH SETS Kyrill posted at TECH@". > > > > > > > > I find this strange... and I was not even named since they dislike me after I found Bugs in their beloved PF (wich henning@) wich they fixed also even if the CVS was "closed" for Release.... So somehow, sometimes, it worked... as SECURITY FIRST was maybe a Paradigm... > > > > > > > > Stuart: A Deal you can tell Theo: > > > > If I find Bugs I might report them. If Not I simply tell you after each Release about it. Because: QWZ TESTS the QWZ-Driver so SHORTLY before Release? "it's too late", right...? > > > > > > > > Why not playing this game equally... > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 16:00:17 +0000 > > To: "info@minifree.org" <info@minifree.org>, > > "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > Subject: AW: LibreWolf Port > > > > Ok Stuart, > > > > YOU JUST ACKNOEDLEDGED AN IMPORT for fucking APACHE.... > > AT THE SAME DAY YOU ASSHOLE... > > > > What do you think PEOPLE DO USE MORE: APACHE or a BROWSER... > > But her Update got denied? Now I start to get unfriendly... > > > > JUST BECAUSE YOU PIECE OF SHIT MAYBE USES APACHE "this is not too late" or what.... > > > > WHAT ENDAGERS MORE PEOPLE.... "an APACHE we can fix AFTER RELEASE" (YOUR WORDS YOU COWARD!) or a Browser wich People install and then wait until you fapped off at some Linux Code or whatever before you rebuild the patched Package for a BROWSER. > > > > DO YOUR FUCKING JOB OR LET SOMEBODY ELSE DO IT..... > > > > Ah it's GIOVANNI and that is why this Update gets in or what? > > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=179093897725544&w=2 > > > > WHAT IS THE DATE STUART.... > > > > NO KIND REGARDS... just > > ROTHER, aka "Rembrandt", Head of HELITH NETWORK.... > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:35: > > > > > Latest Patchset for the QWZ-Driver (and look what they "missed" accidently, DMA, RX ..memory Management. But what could get wrong in a Driver wich is in the Kernel, right? It was send on the first of this Month, her Request was send on the second. > > > > > > Is this realy the Border Stuart? Then I just mention Bugs on the SECOND of course... or the third of a Month? > > > > > > And happy GERMAN REUNIFICATION DAY :) > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:19: > > > > > > > An information I missed to let you know: > > > > > > > > I never asked Stuart to do this for a Port but I see no Issues. > > > > Not fixing the Bugs Endlagers People and Users. Otherwise I will and would have waited with my Critic about the QWZ-Driver since I was not aware "it's too short" and "No time anymore".... > > > > > > > > Sure you can Patch things later but I was not aware OpenBSd is now days driven like a retarded EA Computer Game who promises you to get "DAY 1 PATCHES".... > > > > > > > > So make your Decision Stuart. You got my Offer... you know I can find Bugs.... > > > > > > > > But rejecting already revied and identical Patches is simply BS.... and not logical. I mean: Ports are anyway maintained POORLY STUART.... Updates are frequently not backported to supported Releases. > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:07: > > > > > > > > > I just like to let you know I wrote a "informational" e-mail to Stuart. > > > > > > > > > > I found the Bugs in the MEMORY MANAGEMENT of the QWZ-Driver and bitched at kyrill and stsp to fix them and Informed Theo and even the german BSI since GENUA-Firewalls base on OpenBSD. > > > > > > > > > > Related to Stuart all these Patches need to get rejected for Release. > > > > > I asked him to make an Exception since sometimes it's required and I reminded him, that 20year before.. the Priority was always: SECURITY FIRST. > > > > > > > > > > Who remembers OpenBSD 2.1 and co anymore.. :-) > > > > > > > > > > But the Decision will be his, and his alone. > > > > > > > > > > I personally thank you for the Port because I think this Project needs support and more Attention since Mozilla became corrupted. Like I would wish Xenoncara-Devs would talk to Libre to unify Patches. > > > > > > > > > > Is there any LTS Version of LibreWolf? > > > > > And maybe we should change (later, next Release) some Config Options so that Hardwaredecoding is enabled by default. It could help to Find Bugs in the Subsystem of OpenBSD but it should be mentioned and also how Users deactivate it. > > > > > > > > > > I am sure we might find something accidently.. > > > > > > > > > > Maybe Stuart and you like to watch a little (realy short) Video: > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/shorts/b1LFe9E2DeU > > > > > > > > > > As I was 16 I cracked the Deutsche Bank network. Now as I am older and drink Wine I find Memory Management Issues (after some Alcohol) in the QWZ-Driver because I decided to come back "to the Field". Be it RX, DMA... and they get into the Release but your Patches should not even they're identical to the others... > > > > > > > > > > So I asked Stuart to include the QWZ-Driver without the Patches (you can read about them as PATCH SETS Kyrill posted at TECH@". > > > > > > > > > > I find this strange... and I was not even named since they dislike me after I found Bugs in their beloved PF (wich henning@) wich they fixed also even if the CVS was "closed" for Release.... So somehow, sometimes, it worked... as SECURITY FIRST was maybe a Paradigm... > > > > > > > > > > Stuart: A Deal you can tell Theo: > > > > > If I find Bugs I might report them. If Not I simply tell you after each Release about it. Because: QWZ TESTS the QWZ-Driver so SHORTLY before Release? "it's too late", right...? > > > > > > > > > > Why not playing this game equally... > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 16:50:13 +0000 > > To: "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > Subject: Volume in sndio > > > > Stuart, > > > > Even after my Critic I might got a very private Question. > > I tried to read and understand sndio and it took me some while. > > > > Issue is: Another happy OpenBSD User but his left ear has Issues and he asked me to make the Sound louder (on the left Channel speficially of course). > > > > This would be the correct Code: > > # Oder den linken Kanal relativ um 10% anheben > > sndioctl output[0].level=+0.1 > > > > Could you maybe talk internally to get such an Example into the Manpage? > > > > Sure not everyone needs it but if you need it: I had also to read it up and such an easy Example could maybe get included. There other Examples included in the Manpage itself. :) > > > > No relation to the other e-Mails but it might be helpful for People. > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > Sebastian Rother > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 16:55:41 +0000 > > To: "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > Subject: AW: Volume in sndio > > > > I just got another Idea: > > > > WHAT IS TO USE: mixerctl or sndioctl... > > > > Bot basicly would do the same so the Code can get factored out wich shrinks the Binaries... > > > > Something like > > "doas mixerctl outputs.master=255,200" > > Wich gets included into the .login or so but requires further Configs. Why can't a user do it without doas and co for his Session? I see no wy so far... > > > > So what would be the "right way"? And why are there multiple Paths? :) > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 18:50: > > > > > Stuart, > > > > > > Even after my Critic I might got a very private Question. > > > I tried to read and understand sndio and it took me some while. > > > > > > Issue is: Another happy OpenBSD User but his left ear has Issues and he asked me to make the Sound louder (on the left Channel speficially of course). > > > > > > This would be the correct Code: > > > # Oder den linken Kanal relativ um 10% anheben > > > sndioctl output[0].level=+0.1 > > > > > > Could you maybe talk internally to get such an Example into the Manpage? > > > > > > Sure not everyone needs it but if you need it: I had also to read it up and such an easy Example could maybe get included. There other Examples included in the Manpage itself. :) > > > > > > No relation to the other e-Mails but it might be helpful for People. > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 16:58:19 +0000 > > To: "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > Subject: AW: Volume in sndio > > > > I do not get it likely. sndio can do Multiplexing so a per Session is basicly possible. > > > > I just see Solutions for SYSTEMWIDE CHANGES, wich is not wanted.... > > > > In Question you lack Music: > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqvckWG2fCU > > Canon in D [Original Version] (J.C. Pachelbel). > > > > You will enjoy it. ;) > > > > > > Thanks Stuart! > > > > Kind regards, > > Sebastian Rother > > > > Gesendet mit Proton Mail: Ein sicherer E-Mail-Dienst. > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 18:55: > > > > > I just got another Idea: > > > > > > WHAT IS TO USE: mixerctl or sndioctl... > > > > > > Bot basicly would do the same so the Code can get factored out wich shrinks the Binaries... > > > > > > Something like > > > "doas mixerctl outputs.master=255,200" > > > Wich gets included into the .login or so but requires further Configs. Why can't a user do it without doas and co for his Session? I see no wy so far... > > > > > > So what would be the "right way"? And why are there multiple Paths? :) > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 18:50: > > > > > > > Stuart, > > > > > > > > Even after my Critic I might got a very private Question. > > > > I tried to read and understand sndio and it took me some while. > > > > > > > > Issue is: Another happy OpenBSD User but his left ear has Issues and he asked me to make the Sound louder (on the left Channel speficially of course). > > > > > > > > This would be the correct Code: > > > > # Oder den linken Kanal relativ um 10% anheben > > > > sndioctl output[0].level=+0.1 > > > > > > > > Could you maybe talk internally to get such an Example into the Manpage? > > > > > > > > Sure not everyone needs it but if you need it: I had also to read it up and such an easy Example could maybe get included. There other Examples included in the Manpage itself. :) > > > > > > > > No relation to the other e-Mails but it might be helpful for People. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > ----- End forwarded message ----- ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 19:24:35 +0000 To: Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org> Subject: AW: [gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com: QWZ Driver and LibreWolf] How about FIXING my open CVE acknowledged Security Hole in OpenSSH after like ~17+ Years Stuart? Just asking for a Friend if we TALK ABOUT SECURITY and not about the PERSON who maybe reports the Issue.... And yes, the CVE is yet "open". :) Why should anyone Respect you again at a Stage after what you have done.... YOU CALL ME OUT that I care for SECURITY? Impressive... Why do you Piece of shit ever consider to get into the EU again.... then? We got Laws against People like you, who willingfull risk our dear EU Customers...... Sorry but i am pissed you sended it to ports@, for what Reason? Where do you get a better Ground or proof your argument. Should I now what... publicaly display stsp and kyrill are Idiots, their Code are junk and they risk Users by providing a Bullshitdriver? Compare you do not import a Browserpatch wich was ~97% the same to the one you included? So what now: NOT writing you anymore... Just leaving the Kids alone with their Bullshit-Code because we do not care who uses our OS anymore.... THAT MIGHT BE THE LAST QUESTION STUART: WHAT NOW, tell me.... Should I proof I wrote Theo, the BSI, GENAU and blamed bluhm@ for writing Bullshitcode too wich allowed stsp and kyrill to copy the Dirt even.... Answer this mail. Think carefully... And all over a port "where it is too late".... but for the qwz-Driver it isn't and I am again not Name.... reminded me to the PF Issues. You Wanna know a FUNNY THING? Both where about Memory Mazement.... strange, or? So what shall it be: Me NEVER contacting you (I agree, it is your right, you don't need Spamfilters, compared to you I have Honor, I NEVER mailed your Mails and co to a Mailinglist)... but this was not the Issue.... and it won't get it fixed. You remind me of Henning, he was also stubborn. He could have become more but it was his Attitute... how did they said in "William Wallace"? The irish: he was not "Right in the Head".... He did not wanted to fix something either, then I reported it to other BSD Projects and VOILA.... SUPRISE MOTHERFUCKER... a PF Patch... and before I was just Asshole. LISTEN STUART: I don't know if you know about modern Tecnics to bypass ASLM and KARL and whatever: THE SCRIPTENGINE in MOZILAA, also in Chrome and co.. the V8-Bullshit-JS-Engine... allows a lot at the Stack. And you don#t Patch the Browser? KARL is even not correctly implemented but that is another Topic Stuart.... And I remind you: 20+ YEARS AGO I told you (not you, as the Project) to get METAMORPH LIKE A COMPUTERVIRUS... what does KARL does? Strange.... It works like a metamorphic Computervirus! INSANE.... And you FUCKTARDS think you all invented it.... Rother Gesendet mit Proton Mail: Ein sicherer E-Mail-Dienst. Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 20:56: > Just to you: > > I can proof I told them about the QWZ Driver... even they might deny it. I wrote to GENUA and the german BSI.... > > So WHAT BULLSHIT.... > > YOU DENY SECURITY PATCHES YOU FUCKTARD but my HINT WICH LEAD TO PATCHES in QWZ (YES PROOF ME HE HAD ALL THE PATCHES IN THE BACKHAND, kyrill! and that STSP KNOW OF EVERYTHING and they WAITED for the LAST MOMENT to get "MASSIVE PATCHES" into STABLE.... IS THAT NOW NORMAL PROCEDURE IN THE DEVELOPMENT? WHO TESTED The Patches? You by GETTING OFF at Linux Code or what? BUT THEY GET INCLUDED and YOU call me out? > > GET IT ADDED TO STABLE.... "in time".... the Port... > > Stuart, > It is not me doing Bullshit. It is you... > > Either you did not know because they where all ashamed to acknowledge it (Reminds me to the PF Bug a little bit...) or you've become dumb. > > And that I did not FORWARDED IT TO A MAILINGLIST, like you did, just shows I might yet still respect you. > > You can call me whatever but I was never a Liar... > > > Rother > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 20:50: > > > And yet I am Right Stuart... > > Just because you dislike the Messanger wont mean the Message is wrong. > > > > Rother > > > > > > Gesendet mit Proton Mail: Ein sicherer E-Mail-Dienst. > > > > Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 19:51: > > > > > I've had enough of your bullshit Sebastian. Please don't email me again. > > > > > > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 14:36:04 +0000 > > > To: "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > Subject: QWZ Driver and LibreWolf > > > > > > About what you wrote at Ports@ related to LibreWolf: > > > > > > " > > > what i meant by "there is no time to do that for release" is that > > > there's no time to do that. > > > " > > > > > > Then ship the QWZ-Driver also! Include it without the Patches for the Memory Managent, PLEASE! "WE HAVE NO TIME", right? > > > > > > > > > Stuart, sometimes you have to make an Exception. > > > A better Approach would be asking the LibreWolf-Developers to provide an LTS and drop Mozilla and just include the LTS-Version. I generally would just include LTS-Versions at the Ports if possible. But that is being me... > > > > > > "this is really too late at this point." > > > > > > Since when do "we" have no TIME FOR SECURITY IN OPENBSD?! > > > Henning even fixed the PF Bug back then within HOURS and the Door for COMMITS where "closed". Kyrill and stsp fixed qwz.... after I bitched both hard... > > > > > > STSP even ack'ed Patches wich where simply wrong before and nobody noticed... And now you tell us all: "It is too late for Security"? > > > > > > Stuart, you will do it because it is the RIGHT THING TO DO. Otherwise reject all the QWZ-Patches.... Come on: Then be LOGICAL! TOO LATE, SORRY for you owned Boxes and the Bullshit we deliver but "we got Rules".... > > > Wich where back 20 Years: SECURITY FIRST... > > > > > > When did I ever asked you about a Port? And the Arguments are right: The Other Patches also went in so they where all basicly reviewed... > > > > > > Leah Rowe is right with her (my assumption, Leah sounds female in German) accusation. BE HAPPY we get People like her! > > > > > > Be happy you get People like me who blame the Devs for coding Bullshit in QWZ: but this gets into the RELEASE and they never named me once (yes I wrote Theo, he also did not mentioned me but after I mailed to him they analyzed their fucking Memory Management.. strange...) > > > > > > Make your Choice but OpenBSD is right now not in the best shape anyway. > > > And yes Stuart: I informed them about the qwz Driver, wich is "too late to get Patches in" related to you. If it works there: Make it possible for this Port... WHY WOULD YOU ENDAGER USERS? That makes no Sense.. > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 15:07:10 +0000 > > > To: "info@minifree.org" <info@minifree.org>, > > > "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > Subject: LibreWolf Port > > > > > > I just like to let you know I wrote a "informational" e-mail to Stuart. > > > > > > I found the Bugs in the MEMORY MANAGEMENT of the QWZ-Driver and bitched at kyrill and stsp to fix them and Informed Theo and even the german BSI since GENUA-Firewalls base on OpenBSD. > > > > > > Related to Stuart all these Patches need to get rejected for Release. > > > I asked him to make an Exception since sometimes it's required and I reminded him, that 20year before.. the Priority was always: SECURITY FIRST. > > > > > > Who remembers OpenBSD 2.1 and co anymore.. :-) > > > > > > But the Decision will be his, and his alone. > > > > > > I personally thank you for the Port because I think this Project needs support and more Attention since Mozilla became corrupted. Like I would wish Xenoncara-Devs would talk to Libre to unify Patches. > > > > > > Is there any LTS Version of LibreWolf? > > > And maybe we should change (later, next Release) some Config Options so that Hardwaredecoding is enabled by default. It could help to Find Bugs in the Subsystem of OpenBSD but it should be mentioned and also how Users deactivate it. > > > > > > I am sure we might find something accidently.. > > > > > > Maybe Stuart and you like to watch a little (realy short) Video: > > > https://www.youtube.com/shorts/b1LFe9E2DeU > > > > > > As I was 16 I cracked the Deutsche Bank network. Now as I am older and drink Wine I find Memory Management Issues (after some Alcohol) in the QWZ-Driver because I decided to come back "to the Field". Be it RX, DMA... and they get into the Release but your Patches should not even they're identical to the others... > > > > > > So I asked Stuart to include the QWZ-Driver without the Patches (you can read about them as PATCH SETS Kyrill posted at TECH@". > > > > > > I find this strange... and I was not even named since they dislike me after I found Bugs in their beloved PF (wich henning@) wich they fixed also even if the CVS was "closed" for Release.... So somehow, sometimes, it worked... as SECURITY FIRST was maybe a Paradigm... > > > > > > Stuart: A Deal you can tell Theo: > > > If I find Bugs I might report them. If Not I simply tell you after each Release about it. Because: QWZ TESTS the QWZ-Driver so SHORTLY before Release? "it's too late", right...? > > > > > > Why not playing this game equally... > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 15:19:58 +0000 > > > To: "info@minifree.org" <info@minifree.org>, > > > "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > Subject: AW: LibreWolf Port > > > > > > An information I missed to let you know: > > > > > > I never asked Stuart to do this for a Port but I see no Issues. > > > Not fixing the Bugs Endlagers People and Users. Otherwise I will and would have waited with my Critic about the QWZ-Driver since I was not aware "it's too short" and "No time anymore".... > > > > > > Sure you can Patch things later but I was not aware OpenBSd is now days driven like a retarded EA Computer Game who promises you to get "DAY 1 PATCHES".... > > > > > > So make your Decision Stuart. You got my Offer... you know I can find Bugs.... > > > > > > But rejecting already revied and identical Patches is simply BS.... and not logical. I mean: Ports are anyway maintained POORLY STUART.... Updates are frequently not backported to supported Releases. > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:07: > > > > > > > I just like to let you know I wrote a "informational" e-mail to Stuart. > > > > > > > > I found the Bugs in the MEMORY MANAGEMENT of the QWZ-Driver and bitched at kyrill and stsp to fix them and Informed Theo and even the german BSI since GENUA-Firewalls base on OpenBSD. > > > > > > > > Related to Stuart all these Patches need to get rejected for Release. > > > > I asked him to make an Exception since sometimes it's required and I reminded him, that 20year before.. the Priority was always: SECURITY FIRST. > > > > > > > > Who remembers OpenBSD 2.1 and co anymore.. :-) > > > > > > > > But the Decision will be his, and his alone. > > > > > > > > I personally thank you for the Port because I think this Project needs support and more Attention since Mozilla became corrupted. Like I would wish Xenoncara-Devs would talk to Libre to unify Patches. > > > > > > > > Is there any LTS Version of LibreWolf? > > > > And maybe we should change (later, next Release) some Config Options so that Hardwaredecoding is enabled by default. It could help to Find Bugs in the Subsystem of OpenBSD but it should be mentioned and also how Users deactivate it. > > > > > > > > I am sure we might find something accidently.. > > > > > > > > Maybe Stuart and you like to watch a little (realy short) Video: > > > > https://www.youtube.com/shorts/b1LFe9E2DeU > > > > > > > > As I was 16 I cracked the Deutsche Bank network. Now as I am older and drink Wine I find Memory Management Issues (after some Alcohol) in the QWZ-Driver because I decided to come back "to the Field". Be it RX, DMA... and they get into the Release but your Patches should not even they're identical to the others... > > > > > > > > So I asked Stuart to include the QWZ-Driver without the Patches (you can read about them as PATCH SETS Kyrill posted at TECH@". > > > > > > > > I find this strange... and I was not even named since they dislike me after I found Bugs in their beloved PF (wich henning@) wich they fixed also even if the CVS was "closed" for Release.... So somehow, sometimes, it worked... as SECURITY FIRST was maybe a Paradigm... > > > > > > > > Stuart: A Deal you can tell Theo: > > > > If I find Bugs I might report them. If Not I simply tell you after each Release about it. Because: QWZ TESTS the QWZ-Driver so SHORTLY before Release? "it's too late", right...? > > > > > > > > Why not playing this game equally... > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 15:35:54 +0000 > > > To: "info@minifree.org" <info@minifree.org>, > > > "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > Subject: AW: LibreWolf Port > > > > > > Latest Patchset for the QWZ-Driver (and look what they "missed" accidently, DMA, RX ..memory Management. But what could get wrong in a Driver wich is in the Kernel, right? It was send on the first of this Month, her Request was send on the second. > > > > > > Is this realy the Border Stuart? Then I just mention Bugs on the SECOND of course... or the third of a Month? > > > > > > And happy GERMAN REUNIFICATION DAY :) > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:19: > > > > > > > An information I missed to let you know: > > > > > > > > I never asked Stuart to do this for a Port but I see no Issues. > > > > Not fixing the Bugs Endlagers People and Users. Otherwise I will and would have waited with my Critic about the QWZ-Driver since I was not aware "it's too short" and "No time anymore".... > > > > > > > > Sure you can Patch things later but I was not aware OpenBSd is now days driven like a retarded EA Computer Game who promises you to get "DAY 1 PATCHES".... > > > > > > > > So make your Decision Stuart. You got my Offer... you know I can find Bugs.... > > > > > > > > But rejecting already revied and identical Patches is simply BS.... and not logical. I mean: Ports are anyway maintained POORLY STUART.... Updates are frequently not backported to supported Releases. > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:07: > > > > > > > > > I just like to let you know I wrote a "informational" e-mail to Stuart. > > > > > > > > > > I found the Bugs in the MEMORY MANAGEMENT of the QWZ-Driver and bitched at kyrill and stsp to fix them and Informed Theo and even the german BSI since GENUA-Firewalls base on OpenBSD. > > > > > > > > > > Related to Stuart all these Patches need to get rejected for Release. > > > > > I asked him to make an Exception since sometimes it's required and I reminded him, that 20year before.. the Priority was always: SECURITY FIRST. > > > > > > > > > > Who remembers OpenBSD 2.1 and co anymore.. :-) > > > > > > > > > > But the Decision will be his, and his alone. > > > > > > > > > > I personally thank you for the Port because I think this Project needs support and more Attention since Mozilla became corrupted. Like I would wish Xenoncara-Devs would talk to Libre to unify Patches. > > > > > > > > > > Is there any LTS Version of LibreWolf? > > > > > And maybe we should change (later, next Release) some Config Options so that Hardwaredecoding is enabled by default. It could help to Find Bugs in the Subsystem of OpenBSD but it should be mentioned and also how Users deactivate it. > > > > > > > > > > I am sure we might find something accidently.. > > > > > > > > > > Maybe Stuart and you like to watch a little (realy short) Video: > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/shorts/b1LFe9E2DeU > > > > > > > > > > As I was 16 I cracked the Deutsche Bank network. Now as I am older and drink Wine I find Memory Management Issues (after some Alcohol) in the QWZ-Driver because I decided to come back "to the Field". Be it RX, DMA... and they get into the Release but your Patches should not even they're identical to the others... > > > > > > > > > > So I asked Stuart to include the QWZ-Driver without the Patches (you can read about them as PATCH SETS Kyrill posted at TECH@". > > > > > > > > > > I find this strange... and I was not even named since they dislike me after I found Bugs in their beloved PF (wich henning@) wich they fixed also even if the CVS was "closed" for Release.... So somehow, sometimes, it worked... as SECURITY FIRST was maybe a Paradigm... > > > > > > > > > > Stuart: A Deal you can tell Theo: > > > > > If I find Bugs I might report them. If Not I simply tell you after each Release about it. Because: QWZ TESTS the QWZ-Driver so SHORTLY before Release? "it's too late", right...? > > > > > > > > > > Why not playing this game equally... > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 16:00:17 +0000 > > > To: "info@minifree.org" <info@minifree.org>, > > > "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > Subject: AW: LibreWolf Port > > > > > > Ok Stuart, > > > > > > YOU JUST ACKNOEDLEDGED AN IMPORT for fucking APACHE.... > > > AT THE SAME DAY YOU ASSHOLE... > > > > > > What do you think PEOPLE DO USE MORE: APACHE or a BROWSER... > > > But her Update got denied? Now I start to get unfriendly... > > > > > > JUST BECAUSE YOU PIECE OF SHIT MAYBE USES APACHE "this is not too late" or what.... > > > > > > WHAT ENDAGERS MORE PEOPLE.... "an APACHE we can fix AFTER RELEASE" (YOUR WORDS YOU COWARD!) or a Browser wich People install and then wait until you fapped off at some Linux Code or whatever before you rebuild the patched Package for a BROWSER. > > > > > > DO YOUR FUCKING JOB OR LET SOMEBODY ELSE DO IT..... > > > > > > Ah it's GIOVANNI and that is why this Update gets in or what? > > > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=179093897725544&w=2 > > > > > > WHAT IS THE DATE STUART.... > > > > > > NO KIND REGARDS... just > > > ROTHER, aka "Rembrandt", Head of HELITH NETWORK.... > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:35: > > > > > > > Latest Patchset for the QWZ-Driver (and look what they "missed" accidently, DMA, RX ..memory Management. But what could get wrong in a Driver wich is in the Kernel, right? It was send on the first of this Month, her Request was send on the second. > > > > > > > > Is this realy the Border Stuart? Then I just mention Bugs on the SECOND of course... or the third of a Month? > > > > > > > > And happy GERMAN REUNIFICATION DAY :) > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:19: > > > > > > > > > An information I missed to let you know: > > > > > > > > > > I never asked Stuart to do this for a Port but I see no Issues. > > > > > Not fixing the Bugs Endlagers People and Users. Otherwise I will and would have waited with my Critic about the QWZ-Driver since I was not aware "it's too short" and "No time anymore".... > > > > > > > > > > Sure you can Patch things later but I was not aware OpenBSd is now days driven like a retarded EA Computer Game who promises you to get "DAY 1 PATCHES".... > > > > > > > > > > So make your Decision Stuart. You got my Offer... you know I can find Bugs.... > > > > > > > > > > But rejecting already revied and identical Patches is simply BS.... and not logical. I mean: Ports are anyway maintained POORLY STUART.... Updates are frequently not backported to supported Releases. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:07: > > > > > > > > > > > I just like to let you know I wrote a "informational" e-mail to Stuart. > > > > > > > > > > > > I found the Bugs in the MEMORY MANAGEMENT of the QWZ-Driver and bitched at kyrill and stsp to fix them and Informed Theo and even the german BSI since GENUA-Firewalls base on OpenBSD. > > > > > > > > > > > > Related to Stuart all these Patches need to get rejected for Release. > > > > > > I asked him to make an Exception since sometimes it's required and I reminded him, that 20year before.. the Priority was always: SECURITY FIRST. > > > > > > > > > > > > Who remembers OpenBSD 2.1 and co anymore.. :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > But the Decision will be his, and his alone. > > > > > > > > > > > > I personally thank you for the Port because I think this Project needs support and more Attention since Mozilla became corrupted. Like I would wish Xenoncara-Devs would talk to Libre to unify Patches. > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there any LTS Version of LibreWolf? > > > > > > And maybe we should change (later, next Release) some Config Options so that Hardwaredecoding is enabled by default. It could help to Find Bugs in the Subsystem of OpenBSD but it should be mentioned and also how Users deactivate it. > > > > > > > > > > > > I am sure we might find something accidently.. > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe Stuart and you like to watch a little (realy short) Video: > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/shorts/b1LFe9E2DeU > > > > > > > > > > > > As I was 16 I cracked the Deutsche Bank network. Now as I am older and drink Wine I find Memory Management Issues (after some Alcohol) in the QWZ-Driver because I decided to come back "to the Field". Be it RX, DMA... and they get into the Release but your Patches should not even they're identical to the others... > > > > > > > > > > > > So I asked Stuart to include the QWZ-Driver without the Patches (you can read about them as PATCH SETS Kyrill posted at TECH@". > > > > > > > > > > > > I find this strange... and I was not even named since they dislike me after I found Bugs in their beloved PF (wich henning@) wich they fixed also even if the CVS was "closed" for Release.... So somehow, sometimes, it worked... as SECURITY FIRST was maybe a Paradigm... > > > > > > > > > > > > Stuart: A Deal you can tell Theo: > > > > > > If I find Bugs I might report them. If Not I simply tell you after each Release about it. Because: QWZ TESTS the QWZ-Driver so SHORTLY before Release? "it's too late", right...? > > > > > > > > > > > > Why not playing this game equally... > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 16:50:13 +0000 > > > To: "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > Subject: Volume in sndio > > > > > > Stuart, > > > > > > Even after my Critic I might got a very private Question. > > > I tried to read and understand sndio and it took me some while. > > > > > > Issue is: Another happy OpenBSD User but his left ear has Issues and he asked me to make the Sound louder (on the left Channel speficially of course). > > > > > > This would be the correct Code: > > > # Oder den linken Kanal relativ um 10% anheben > > > sndioctl output[0].level=+0.1 > > > > > > Could you maybe talk internally to get such an Example into the Manpage? > > > > > > Sure not everyone needs it but if you need it: I had also to read it up and such an easy Example could maybe get included. There other Examples included in the Manpage itself. :) > > > > > > No relation to the other e-Mails but it might be helpful for People. > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 16:55:41 +0000 > > > To: "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > Subject: AW: Volume in sndio > > > > > > I just got another Idea: > > > > > > WHAT IS TO USE: mixerctl or sndioctl... > > > > > > Bot basicly would do the same so the Code can get factored out wich shrinks the Binaries... > > > > > > Something like > > > "doas mixerctl outputs.master=255,200" > > > Wich gets included into the .login or so but requires further Configs. Why can't a user do it without doas and co for his Session? I see no wy so far... > > > > > > So what would be the "right way"? And why are there multiple Paths? :) > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 18:50: > > > > > > > Stuart, > > > > > > > > Even after my Critic I might got a very private Question. > > > > I tried to read and understand sndio and it took me some while. > > > > > > > > Issue is: Another happy OpenBSD User but his left ear has Issues and he asked me to make the Sound louder (on the left Channel speficially of course). > > > > > > > > This would be the correct Code: > > > > # Oder den linken Kanal relativ um 10% anheben > > > > sndioctl output[0].level=+0.1 > > > > > > > > Could you maybe talk internally to get such an Example into the Manpage? > > > > > > > > Sure not everyone needs it but if you need it: I had also to read it up and such an easy Example could maybe get included. There other Examples included in the Manpage itself. :) > > > > > > > > No relation to the other e-Mails but it might be helpful for People. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 16:58:19 +0000 > > > To: "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > Subject: AW: Volume in sndio > > > > > > I do not get it likely. sndio can do Multiplexing so a per Session is basicly possible. > > > > > > I just see Solutions for SYSTEMWIDE CHANGES, wich is not wanted.... > > > > > > In Question you lack Music: > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqvckWG2fCU > > > Canon in D [Original Version] (J.C. Pachelbel). > > > > > > You will enjoy it. ;) > > > > > > > > > Thanks Stuart! > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > Gesendet mit Proton Mail: Ein sicherer E-Mail-Dienst. > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 18:55: > > > > > > > I just got another Idea: > > > > > > > > WHAT IS TO USE: mixerctl or sndioctl... > > > > > > > > Bot basicly would do the same so the Code can get factored out wich shrinks the Binaries... > > > > > > > > Something like > > > > "doas mixerctl outputs.master=255,200" > > > > Wich gets included into the .login or so but requires further Configs. Why can't a user do it without doas and co for his Session? I see no wy so far... > > > > > > > > So what would be the "right way"? And why are there multiple Paths? :) > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 18:50: > > > > > > > > > Stuart, > > > > > > > > > > Even after my Critic I might got a very private Question. > > > > > I tried to read and understand sndio and it took me some while. > > > > > > > > > > Issue is: Another happy OpenBSD User but his left ear has Issues and he asked me to make the Sound louder (on the left Channel speficially of course). > > > > > > > > > > This would be the correct Code: > > > > > # Oder den linken Kanal relativ um 10% anheben > > > > > sndioctl output[0].level=+0.1 > > > > > > > > > > Could you maybe talk internally to get such an Example into the Manpage? > > > > > > > > > > Sure not everyone needs it but if you need it: I had also to read it up and such an easy Example could maybe get included. There other Examples included in the Manpage itself. :) > > > > > > > > > > No relation to the other e-Mails but it might be helpful for People. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 19:37:08 +0000 To: Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org> Subject: AW: [gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com: QWZ Driver and LibreWolf] I give you a LAST HINT wich makes the Difference even you maybe not understand it. I NEVER BLAMED kyrill, stsp, theo or anyone at a Mailinglist, yet they fixed a lot Memory management issues... You fucking british Shit did what? Wrote at ports@... Because you claim you DISANGREE with a PERSON who cares about Security and maybe knows why this Patch should get in. But you are too stupid for KARL and co and do not understand the Issues related to DMA and RX Registers maybe... if you please: I Could forward you the Mails to GENUA, that i blamed bluhm@ and co.... IF YOU WANT PUBLICITY: Why not go full in? It was never YOUR FAULT.... and not even Theo mailed to any Mailinglist... So if we go this way lets make everything Public, or? :D And this all, compared to import a Port where you are too stupid to understand the security implications... And yes you do a lousy Job... maintaining the Ports. Rother Gesendet mit Proton Mail: Ein sicherer E-Mail-Dienst. Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 21:24: > How about FIXING my open CVE acknowledged Security Hole in OpenSSH after like ~17+ Years Stuart? > > Just asking for a Friend if we TALK ABOUT SECURITY and not about the PERSON who maybe reports the Issue.... > > And yes, the CVE is yet "open". :) > Why should anyone Respect you again at a Stage after what you have done.... YOU CALL ME OUT that I care for SECURITY? Impressive... > > Why do you Piece of shit ever consider to get into the EU again.... then? We got Laws against People like you, who willingfull risk our dear EU Customers...... > > Sorry but i am pissed you sended it to ports@, for what Reason? Where do you get a better Ground or proof your argument. Should I now what... publicaly display stsp and kyrill are Idiots, their Code are junk and they risk Users by providing a Bullshitdriver? Compare you do not import a Browserpatch wich was ~97% the same to the one you included? > > > So what now: NOT writing you anymore... > Just leaving the Kids alone with their Bullshit-Code because we do not care who uses our OS anymore.... > > THAT MIGHT BE THE LAST QUESTION STUART: > > WHAT NOW, tell me.... Should I proof I wrote Theo, the BSI, GENAU and blamed bluhm@ for writing Bullshitcode too wich allowed stsp and kyrill to copy the Dirt even.... > > Answer this mail. Think carefully... > And all over a port "where it is too late".... but for the qwz-Driver it isn't and I am again not Name.... reminded me to the PF Issues. You Wanna know a FUNNY THING? Both where about Memory Mazement.... strange, or? > > So what shall it be: Me NEVER contacting you (I agree, it is your right, you don't need Spamfilters, compared to you I have Honor, I NEVER mailed your Mails and co to a Mailinglist)... but this was not the Issue.... and it won't get it fixed. > > You remind me of Henning, he was also stubborn. He could have become more but it was his Attitute... how did they said in "William Wallace"? The irish: he was not "Right in the Head".... > > He did not wanted to fix something either, then I reported it to other BSD Projects and VOILA.... SUPRISE MOTHERFUCKER... a PF Patch... and before I was just Asshole. > > LISTEN STUART: I don't know if you know about modern Tecnics to bypass ASLM and KARL and whatever: THE SCRIPTENGINE in MOZILAA, also in Chrome and co.. the V8-Bullshit-JS-Engine... allows a lot at the Stack. And you don#t Patch the Browser? > > KARL is even not correctly implemented but that is another Topic Stuart.... > > And I remind you: 20+ YEARS AGO I told you (not you, as the Project) to get METAMORPH LIKE A COMPUTERVIRUS... what does KARL does? Strange.... It works like a metamorphic Computervirus! INSANE.... > > And you FUCKTARDS think you all invented it.... > > Rother > > Gesendet mit Proton Mail: Ein sicherer E-Mail-Dienst. > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 20:56: > > > Just to you: > > > > I can proof I told them about the QWZ Driver... even they might deny it. I wrote to GENUA and the german BSI.... > > > > So WHAT BULLSHIT.... > > > > YOU DENY SECURITY PATCHES YOU FUCKTARD but my HINT WICH LEAD TO PATCHES in QWZ (YES PROOF ME HE HAD ALL THE PATCHES IN THE BACKHAND, kyrill! and that STSP KNOW OF EVERYTHING and they WAITED for the LAST MOMENT to get "MASSIVE PATCHES" into STABLE.... IS THAT NOW NORMAL PROCEDURE IN THE DEVELOPMENT? WHO TESTED The Patches? You by GETTING OFF at Linux Code or what? BUT THEY GET INCLUDED and YOU call me out? > > > > GET IT ADDED TO STABLE.... "in time".... the Port... > > > > Stuart, > > It is not me doing Bullshit. It is you... > > > > Either you did not know because they where all ashamed to acknowledge it (Reminds me to the PF Bug a little bit...) or you've become dumb. > > > > And that I did not FORWARDED IT TO A MAILINGLIST, like you did, just shows I might yet still respect you. > > > > You can call me whatever but I was never a Liar... > > > > > > Rother > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 20:50: > > > > > And yet I am Right Stuart... > > > Just because you dislike the Messanger wont mean the Message is wrong. > > > > > > Rother > > > > > > > > > Gesendet mit Proton Mail: Ein sicherer E-Mail-Dienst. > > > > > > Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 19:51: > > > > > > > I've had enough of your bullshit Sebastian. Please don't email me again. > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 14:36:04 +0000 > > > > To: "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > > Subject: QWZ Driver and LibreWolf > > > > > > > > About what you wrote at Ports@ related to LibreWolf: > > > > > > > > " > > > > what i meant by "there is no time to do that for release" is that > > > > there's no time to do that. > > > > " > > > > > > > > Then ship the QWZ-Driver also! Include it without the Patches for the Memory Managent, PLEASE! "WE HAVE NO TIME", right? > > > > > > > > > > > > Stuart, sometimes you have to make an Exception. > > > > A better Approach would be asking the LibreWolf-Developers to provide an LTS and drop Mozilla and just include the LTS-Version. I generally would just include LTS-Versions at the Ports if possible. But that is being me... > > > > > > > > "this is really too late at this point." > > > > > > > > Since when do "we" have no TIME FOR SECURITY IN OPENBSD?! > > > > Henning even fixed the PF Bug back then within HOURS and the Door for COMMITS where "closed". Kyrill and stsp fixed qwz.... after I bitched both hard... > > > > > > > > STSP even ack'ed Patches wich where simply wrong before and nobody noticed... And now you tell us all: "It is too late for Security"? > > > > > > > > Stuart, you will do it because it is the RIGHT THING TO DO. Otherwise reject all the QWZ-Patches.... Come on: Then be LOGICAL! TOO LATE, SORRY for you owned Boxes and the Bullshit we deliver but "we got Rules".... > > > > Wich where back 20 Years: SECURITY FIRST... > > > > > > > > When did I ever asked you about a Port? And the Arguments are right: The Other Patches also went in so they where all basicly reviewed... > > > > > > > > Leah Rowe is right with her (my assumption, Leah sounds female in German) accusation. BE HAPPY we get People like her! > > > > > > > > Be happy you get People like me who blame the Devs for coding Bullshit in QWZ: but this gets into the RELEASE and they never named me once (yes I wrote Theo, he also did not mentioned me but after I mailed to him they analyzed their fucking Memory Management.. strange...) > > > > > > > > Make your Choice but OpenBSD is right now not in the best shape anyway. > > > > And yes Stuart: I informed them about the qwz Driver, wich is "too late to get Patches in" related to you. If it works there: Make it possible for this Port... WHY WOULD YOU ENDAGER USERS? That makes no Sense.. > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 15:07:10 +0000 > > > > To: "info@minifree.org" <info@minifree.org>, > > > > "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > > Subject: LibreWolf Port > > > > > > > > I just like to let you know I wrote a "informational" e-mail to Stuart. > > > > > > > > I found the Bugs in the MEMORY MANAGEMENT of the QWZ-Driver and bitched at kyrill and stsp to fix them and Informed Theo and even the german BSI since GENUA-Firewalls base on OpenBSD. > > > > > > > > Related to Stuart all these Patches need to get rejected for Release. > > > > I asked him to make an Exception since sometimes it's required and I reminded him, that 20year before.. the Priority was always: SECURITY FIRST. > > > > > > > > Who remembers OpenBSD 2.1 and co anymore.. :-) > > > > > > > > But the Decision will be his, and his alone. > > > > > > > > I personally thank you for the Port because I think this Project needs support and more Attention since Mozilla became corrupted. Like I would wish Xenoncara-Devs would talk to Libre to unify Patches. > > > > > > > > Is there any LTS Version of LibreWolf? > > > > And maybe we should change (later, next Release) some Config Options so that Hardwaredecoding is enabled by default. It could help to Find Bugs in the Subsystem of OpenBSD but it should be mentioned and also how Users deactivate it. > > > > > > > > I am sure we might find something accidently.. > > > > > > > > Maybe Stuart and you like to watch a little (realy short) Video: > > > > https://www.youtube.com/shorts/b1LFe9E2DeU > > > > > > > > As I was 16 I cracked the Deutsche Bank network. Now as I am older and drink Wine I find Memory Management Issues (after some Alcohol) in the QWZ-Driver because I decided to come back "to the Field". Be it RX, DMA... and they get into the Release but your Patches should not even they're identical to the others... > > > > > > > > So I asked Stuart to include the QWZ-Driver without the Patches (you can read about them as PATCH SETS Kyrill posted at TECH@". > > > > > > > > I find this strange... and I was not even named since they dislike me after I found Bugs in their beloved PF (wich henning@) wich they fixed also even if the CVS was "closed" for Release.... So somehow, sometimes, it worked... as SECURITY FIRST was maybe a Paradigm... > > > > > > > > Stuart: A Deal you can tell Theo: > > > > If I find Bugs I might report them. If Not I simply tell you after each Release about it. Because: QWZ TESTS the QWZ-Driver so SHORTLY before Release? "it's too late", right...? > > > > > > > > Why not playing this game equally... > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 15:19:58 +0000 > > > > To: "info@minifree.org" <info@minifree.org>, > > > > "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > > Subject: AW: LibreWolf Port > > > > > > > > An information I missed to let you know: > > > > > > > > I never asked Stuart to do this for a Port but I see no Issues. > > > > Not fixing the Bugs Endlagers People and Users. Otherwise I will and would have waited with my Critic about the QWZ-Driver since I was not aware "it's too short" and "No time anymore".... > > > > > > > > Sure you can Patch things later but I was not aware OpenBSd is now days driven like a retarded EA Computer Game who promises you to get "DAY 1 PATCHES".... > > > > > > > > So make your Decision Stuart. You got my Offer... you know I can find Bugs.... > > > > > > > > But rejecting already revied and identical Patches is simply BS.... and not logical. I mean: Ports are anyway maintained POORLY STUART.... Updates are frequently not backported to supported Releases. > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:07: > > > > > > > > > I just like to let you know I wrote a "informational" e-mail to Stuart. > > > > > > > > > > I found the Bugs in the MEMORY MANAGEMENT of the QWZ-Driver and bitched at kyrill and stsp to fix them and Informed Theo and even the german BSI since GENUA-Firewalls base on OpenBSD. > > > > > > > > > > Related to Stuart all these Patches need to get rejected for Release. > > > > > I asked him to make an Exception since sometimes it's required and I reminded him, that 20year before.. the Priority was always: SECURITY FIRST. > > > > > > > > > > Who remembers OpenBSD 2.1 and co anymore.. :-) > > > > > > > > > > But the Decision will be his, and his alone. > > > > > > > > > > I personally thank you for the Port because I think this Project needs support and more Attention since Mozilla became corrupted. Like I would wish Xenoncara-Devs would talk to Libre to unify Patches. > > > > > > > > > > Is there any LTS Version of LibreWolf? > > > > > And maybe we should change (later, next Release) some Config Options so that Hardwaredecoding is enabled by default. It could help to Find Bugs in the Subsystem of OpenBSD but it should be mentioned and also how Users deactivate it. > > > > > > > > > > I am sure we might find something accidently.. > > > > > > > > > > Maybe Stuart and you like to watch a little (realy short) Video: > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/shorts/b1LFe9E2DeU > > > > > > > > > > As I was 16 I cracked the Deutsche Bank network. Now as I am older and drink Wine I find Memory Management Issues (after some Alcohol) in the QWZ-Driver because I decided to come back "to the Field". Be it RX, DMA... and they get into the Release but your Patches should not even they're identical to the others... > > > > > > > > > > So I asked Stuart to include the QWZ-Driver without the Patches (you can read about them as PATCH SETS Kyrill posted at TECH@". > > > > > > > > > > I find this strange... and I was not even named since they dislike me after I found Bugs in their beloved PF (wich henning@) wich they fixed also even if the CVS was "closed" for Release.... So somehow, sometimes, it worked... as SECURITY FIRST was maybe a Paradigm... > > > > > > > > > > Stuart: A Deal you can tell Theo: > > > > > If I find Bugs I might report them. If Not I simply tell you after each Release about it. Because: QWZ TESTS the QWZ-Driver so SHORTLY before Release? "it's too late", right...? > > > > > > > > > > Why not playing this game equally... > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 15:35:54 +0000 > > > > To: "info@minifree.org" <info@minifree.org>, > > > > "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > > Subject: AW: LibreWolf Port > > > > > > > > Latest Patchset for the QWZ-Driver (and look what they "missed" accidently, DMA, RX ..memory Management. But what could get wrong in a Driver wich is in the Kernel, right? It was send on the first of this Month, her Request was send on the second. > > > > > > > > Is this realy the Border Stuart? Then I just mention Bugs on the SECOND of course... or the third of a Month? > > > > > > > > And happy GERMAN REUNIFICATION DAY :) > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:19: > > > > > > > > > An information I missed to let you know: > > > > > > > > > > I never asked Stuart to do this for a Port but I see no Issues. > > > > > Not fixing the Bugs Endlagers People and Users. Otherwise I will and would have waited with my Critic about the QWZ-Driver since I was not aware "it's too short" and "No time anymore".... > > > > > > > > > > Sure you can Patch things later but I was not aware OpenBSd is now days driven like a retarded EA Computer Game who promises you to get "DAY 1 PATCHES".... > > > > > > > > > > So make your Decision Stuart. You got my Offer... you know I can find Bugs.... > > > > > > > > > > But rejecting already revied and identical Patches is simply BS.... and not logical. I mean: Ports are anyway maintained POORLY STUART.... Updates are frequently not backported to supported Releases. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:07: > > > > > > > > > > > I just like to let you know I wrote a "informational" e-mail to Stuart. > > > > > > > > > > > > I found the Bugs in the MEMORY MANAGEMENT of the QWZ-Driver and bitched at kyrill and stsp to fix them and Informed Theo and even the german BSI since GENUA-Firewalls base on OpenBSD. > > > > > > > > > > > > Related to Stuart all these Patches need to get rejected for Release. > > > > > > I asked him to make an Exception since sometimes it's required and I reminded him, that 20year before.. the Priority was always: SECURITY FIRST. > > > > > > > > > > > > Who remembers OpenBSD 2.1 and co anymore.. :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > But the Decision will be his, and his alone. > > > > > > > > > > > > I personally thank you for the Port because I think this Project needs support and more Attention since Mozilla became corrupted. Like I would wish Xenoncara-Devs would talk to Libre to unify Patches. > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there any LTS Version of LibreWolf? > > > > > > And maybe we should change (later, next Release) some Config Options so that Hardwaredecoding is enabled by default. It could help to Find Bugs in the Subsystem of OpenBSD but it should be mentioned and also how Users deactivate it. > > > > > > > > > > > > I am sure we might find something accidently.. > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe Stuart and you like to watch a little (realy short) Video: > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/shorts/b1LFe9E2DeU > > > > > > > > > > > > As I was 16 I cracked the Deutsche Bank network. Now as I am older and drink Wine I find Memory Management Issues (after some Alcohol) in the QWZ-Driver because I decided to come back "to the Field". Be it RX, DMA... and they get into the Release but your Patches should not even they're identical to the others... > > > > > > > > > > > > So I asked Stuart to include the QWZ-Driver without the Patches (you can read about them as PATCH SETS Kyrill posted at TECH@". > > > > > > > > > > > > I find this strange... and I was not even named since they dislike me after I found Bugs in their beloved PF (wich henning@) wich they fixed also even if the CVS was "closed" for Release.... So somehow, sometimes, it worked... as SECURITY FIRST was maybe a Paradigm... > > > > > > > > > > > > Stuart: A Deal you can tell Theo: > > > > > > If I find Bugs I might report them. If Not I simply tell you after each Release about it. Because: QWZ TESTS the QWZ-Driver so SHORTLY before Release? "it's too late", right...? > > > > > > > > > > > > Why not playing this game equally... > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 16:00:17 +0000 > > > > To: "info@minifree.org" <info@minifree.org>, > > > > "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > > Subject: AW: LibreWolf Port > > > > > > > > Ok Stuart, > > > > > > > > YOU JUST ACKNOEDLEDGED AN IMPORT for fucking APACHE.... > > > > AT THE SAME DAY YOU ASSHOLE... > > > > > > > > What do you think PEOPLE DO USE MORE: APACHE or a BROWSER... > > > > But her Update got denied? Now I start to get unfriendly... > > > > > > > > JUST BECAUSE YOU PIECE OF SHIT MAYBE USES APACHE "this is not too late" or what.... > > > > > > > > WHAT ENDAGERS MORE PEOPLE.... "an APACHE we can fix AFTER RELEASE" (YOUR WORDS YOU COWARD!) or a Browser wich People install and then wait until you fapped off at some Linux Code or whatever before you rebuild the patched Package for a BROWSER. > > > > > > > > DO YOUR FUCKING JOB OR LET SOMEBODY ELSE DO IT..... > > > > > > > > Ah it's GIOVANNI and that is why this Update gets in or what? > > > > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=179093897725544&w=2 > > > > > > > > WHAT IS THE DATE STUART.... > > > > > > > > NO KIND REGARDS... just > > > > ROTHER, aka "Rembrandt", Head of HELITH NETWORK.... > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:35: > > > > > > > > > Latest Patchset for the QWZ-Driver (and look what they "missed" accidently, DMA, RX ..memory Management. But what could get wrong in a Driver wich is in the Kernel, right? It was send on the first of this Month, her Request was send on the second. > > > > > > > > > > Is this realy the Border Stuart? Then I just mention Bugs on the SECOND of course... or the third of a Month? > > > > > > > > > > And happy GERMAN REUNIFICATION DAY :) > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:19: > > > > > > > > > > > An information I missed to let you know: > > > > > > > > > > > > I never asked Stuart to do this for a Port but I see no Issues. > > > > > > Not fixing the Bugs Endlagers People and Users. Otherwise I will and would have waited with my Critic about the QWZ-Driver since I was not aware "it's too short" and "No time anymore".... > > > > > > > > > > > > Sure you can Patch things later but I was not aware OpenBSd is now days driven like a retarded EA Computer Game who promises you to get "DAY 1 PATCHES".... > > > > > > > > > > > > So make your Decision Stuart. You got my Offer... you know I can find Bugs.... > > > > > > > > > > > > But rejecting already revied and identical Patches is simply BS.... and not logical. I mean: Ports are anyway maintained POORLY STUART.... Updates are frequently not backported to supported Releases. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:07: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just like to let you know I wrote a "informational" e-mail to Stuart. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I found the Bugs in the MEMORY MANAGEMENT of the QWZ-Driver and bitched at kyrill and stsp to fix them and Informed Theo and even the german BSI since GENUA-Firewalls base on OpenBSD. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Related to Stuart all these Patches need to get rejected for Release. > > > > > > > I asked him to make an Exception since sometimes it's required and I reminded him, that 20year before.. the Priority was always: SECURITY FIRST. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Who remembers OpenBSD 2.1 and co anymore.. :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But the Decision will be his, and his alone. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I personally thank you for the Port because I think this Project needs support and more Attention since Mozilla became corrupted. Like I would wish Xenoncara-Devs would talk to Libre to unify Patches. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there any LTS Version of LibreWolf? > > > > > > > And maybe we should change (later, next Release) some Config Options so that Hardwaredecoding is enabled by default. It could help to Find Bugs in the Subsystem of OpenBSD but it should be mentioned and also how Users deactivate it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am sure we might find something accidently.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe Stuart and you like to watch a little (realy short) Video: > > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/shorts/b1LFe9E2DeU > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As I was 16 I cracked the Deutsche Bank network. Now as I am older and drink Wine I find Memory Management Issues (after some Alcohol) in the QWZ-Driver because I decided to come back "to the Field". Be it RX, DMA... and they get into the Release but your Patches should not even they're identical to the others... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So I asked Stuart to include the QWZ-Driver without the Patches (you can read about them as PATCH SETS Kyrill posted at TECH@". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I find this strange... and I was not even named since they dislike me after I found Bugs in their beloved PF (wich henning@) wich they fixed also even if the CVS was "closed" for Release.... So somehow, sometimes, it worked... as SECURITY FIRST was maybe a Paradigm... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stuart: A Deal you can tell Theo: > > > > > > > If I find Bugs I might report them. If Not I simply tell you after each Release about it. Because: QWZ TESTS the QWZ-Driver so SHORTLY before Release? "it's too late", right...? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why not playing this game equally... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 16:50:13 +0000 > > > > To: "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > > Subject: Volume in sndio > > > > > > > > Stuart, > > > > > > > > Even after my Critic I might got a very private Question. > > > > I tried to read and understand sndio and it took me some while. > > > > > > > > Issue is: Another happy OpenBSD User but his left ear has Issues and he asked me to make the Sound louder (on the left Channel speficially of course). > > > > > > > > This would be the correct Code: > > > > # Oder den linken Kanal relativ um 10% anheben > > > > sndioctl output[0].level=+0.1 > > > > > > > > Could you maybe talk internally to get such an Example into the Manpage? > > > > > > > > Sure not everyone needs it but if you need it: I had also to read it up and such an easy Example could maybe get included. There other Examples included in the Manpage itself. :) > > > > > > > > No relation to the other e-Mails but it might be helpful for People. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 16:55:41 +0000 > > > > To: "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > > Subject: AW: Volume in sndio > > > > > > > > I just got another Idea: > > > > > > > > WHAT IS TO USE: mixerctl or sndioctl... > > > > > > > > Bot basicly would do the same so the Code can get factored out wich shrinks the Binaries... > > > > > > > > Something like > > > > "doas mixerctl outputs.master=255,200" > > > > Wich gets included into the .login or so but requires further Configs. Why can't a user do it without doas and co for his Session? I see no wy so far... > > > > > > > > So what would be the "right way"? And why are there multiple Paths? :) > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 18:50: > > > > > > > > > Stuart, > > > > > > > > > > Even after my Critic I might got a very private Question. > > > > > I tried to read and understand sndio and it took me some while. > > > > > > > > > > Issue is: Another happy OpenBSD User but his left ear has Issues and he asked me to make the Sound louder (on the left Channel speficially of course). > > > > > > > > > > This would be the correct Code: > > > > > # Oder den linken Kanal relativ um 10% anheben > > > > > sndioctl output[0].level=+0.1 > > > > > > > > > > Could you maybe talk internally to get such an Example into the Manpage? > > > > > > > > > > Sure not everyone needs it but if you need it: I had also to read it up and such an easy Example could maybe get included. There other Examples included in the Manpage itself. :) > > > > > > > > > > No relation to the other e-Mails but it might be helpful for People. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 16:58:19 +0000 > > > > To: "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > > Subject: AW: Volume in sndio > > > > > > > > I do not get it likely. sndio can do Multiplexing so a per Session is basicly possible. > > > > > > > > I just see Solutions for SYSTEMWIDE CHANGES, wich is not wanted.... > > > > > > > > In Question you lack Music: > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqvckWG2fCU > > > > Canon in D [Original Version] (J.C. Pachelbel). > > > > > > > > You will enjoy it. ;) > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Stuart! > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > Gesendet mit Proton Mail: Ein sicherer E-Mail-Dienst. > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 18:55: > > > > > > > > > I just got another Idea: > > > > > > > > > > WHAT IS TO USE: mixerctl or sndioctl... > > > > > > > > > > Bot basicly would do the same so the Code can get factored out wich shrinks the Binaries... > > > > > > > > > > Something like > > > > > "doas mixerctl outputs.master=255,200" > > > > > Wich gets included into the .login or so but requires further Configs. Why can't a user do it without doas and co for his Session? I see no wy so far... > > > > > > > > > > So what would be the "right way"? And why are there multiple Paths? :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 18:50: > > > > > > > > > > > Stuart, > > > > > > > > > > > > Even after my Critic I might got a very private Question. > > > > > > I tried to read and understand sndio and it took me some while. > > > > > > > > > > > > Issue is: Another happy OpenBSD User but his left ear has Issues and he asked me to make the Sound louder (on the left Channel speficially of course). > > > > > > > > > > > > This would be the correct Code: > > > > > > # Oder den linken Kanal relativ um 10% anheben > > > > > > sndioctl output[0].level=+0.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you maybe talk internally to get such an Example into the Manpage? > > > > > > > > > > > > Sure not everyone needs it but if you need it: I had also to read it up and such an easy Example could maybe get included. There other Examples included in the Manpage itself. :) > > > > > > > > > > > > No relation to the other e-Mails but it might be helpful for People. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 20:11:22 +0000 To: Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org> Subject: AW: [gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com: QWZ Driver and LibreWolf] Listen Stuart, you can even "claim this SLOGAN": In my RECENT PART I took out 3 HAMAS CELLS and other Terrorists... Now I am "back" and bitching you and others because you fucked up.... Call me a Loonie, won't matter (since maybe you need to be a Loonie to do stuff..). That is why I tell you, that you might never enter the EU again.. because you do block actively Security Patches for our beloved EU Citizen... wich you are NOT (as a british). But you also might get the Attention of other Countries using OpenBSD... Canada, USA... You ever heared about FIVE-EYES? Me neither... some Mythos from Rightwingers. Lets play Games Stuart.... but my Body ain't as "good" anymore... But for some Games I am always up for.... :) You? And I will tell your name to other friendly Nations because you prevented a security critical Patch to get into a Release and you ris Users WILLINGFULLY. Have fun and yes I am honorable, I will let you know and set you on cc.... and this has nothing to do with OpenBSD, it is all about you then. :) 2 Days until I contact EuroPol about you :) And yes you get a CC... WHY DO YOU FUCKING REFUSE TO LET THE SAME PATCHES IN WHERE IT IS CRITICAL BECAUSE ALL OF THEIR JS-ENGINE IS BULLSHIT. Why do you think I bitched about qwz? Why do you think I care? Could somebody maybe preparate the Stack in a way that a SYSTEM with a qwz-Driver could get owned? WHO KNOWS: For this we would need... "Experts".... But you deliver the Brwoser for it! Awesome... Rother And now PISS OFF STUART. I was not kidding... Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 21:37: > I give you a LAST HINT wich makes the Difference even you maybe not understand it. > > I NEVER BLAMED kyrill, stsp, theo or anyone at a Mailinglist, yet they fixed a lot Memory management issues... > > You fucking british Shit did what? Wrote at ports@... > Because you claim you DISANGREE with a PERSON who cares about Security and maybe knows why this Patch should get in. > > But you are too stupid for KARL and co and do not understand the Issues related to DMA and RX Registers maybe... > > if you please: I Could forward you the Mails to GENUA, that i blamed bluhm@ and co.... > > IF YOU WANT PUBLICITY: Why not go full in? > It was never YOUR FAULT.... and not even Theo mailed to any Mailinglist... So if we go this way lets make everything Public, or? :D > > And this all, compared to import a Port where you are too stupid to understand the security implications... > > And yes you do a lousy Job... maintaining the Ports. > > Rother > > > Gesendet mit Proton Mail: Ein sicherer E-Mail-Dienst. > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 21:24: > > > How about FIXING my open CVE acknowledged Security Hole in OpenSSH after like ~17+ Years Stuart? > > > > Just asking for a Friend if we TALK ABOUT SECURITY and not about the PERSON who maybe reports the Issue.... > > > > And yes, the CVE is yet "open". :) > > Why should anyone Respect you again at a Stage after what you have done.... YOU CALL ME OUT that I care for SECURITY? Impressive... > > > > Why do you Piece of shit ever consider to get into the EU again.... then? We got Laws against People like you, who willingfull risk our dear EU Customers...... > > > > Sorry but i am pissed you sended it to ports@, for what Reason? Where do you get a better Ground or proof your argument. Should I now what... publicaly display stsp and kyrill are Idiots, their Code are junk and they risk Users by providing a Bullshitdriver? Compare you do not import a Browserpatch wich was ~97% the same to the one you included? > > > > > > So what now: NOT writing you anymore... > > Just leaving the Kids alone with their Bullshit-Code because we do not care who uses our OS anymore.... > > > > THAT MIGHT BE THE LAST QUESTION STUART: > > > > WHAT NOW, tell me.... Should I proof I wrote Theo, the BSI, GENAU and blamed bluhm@ for writing Bullshitcode too wich allowed stsp and kyrill to copy the Dirt even.... > > > > Answer this mail. Think carefully... > > And all over a port "where it is too late".... but for the qwz-Driver it isn't and I am again not Name.... reminded me to the PF Issues. You Wanna know a FUNNY THING? Both where about Memory Mazement.... strange, or? > > > > So what shall it be: Me NEVER contacting you (I agree, it is your right, you don't need Spamfilters, compared to you I have Honor, I NEVER mailed your Mails and co to a Mailinglist)... but this was not the Issue.... and it won't get it fixed. > > > > You remind me of Henning, he was also stubborn. He could have become more but it was his Attitute... how did they said in "William Wallace"? The irish: he was not "Right in the Head".... > > > > He did not wanted to fix something either, then I reported it to other BSD Projects and VOILA.... SUPRISE MOTHERFUCKER... a PF Patch... and before I was just Asshole. > > > > LISTEN STUART: I don't know if you know about modern Tecnics to bypass ASLM and KARL and whatever: THE SCRIPTENGINE in MOZILAA, also in Chrome and co.. the V8-Bullshit-JS-Engine... allows a lot at the Stack. And you don#t Patch the Browser? > > > > KARL is even not correctly implemented but that is another Topic Stuart.... > > > > And I remind you: 20+ YEARS AGO I told you (not you, as the Project) to get METAMORPH LIKE A COMPUTERVIRUS... what does KARL does? Strange.... It works like a metamorphic Computervirus! INSANE.... > > > > And you FUCKTARDS think you all invented it.... > > > > Rother > > > > Gesendet mit Proton Mail: Ein sicherer E-Mail-Dienst. > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 20:56: > > > > > Just to you: > > > > > > I can proof I told them about the QWZ Driver... even they might deny it. I wrote to GENUA and the german BSI.... > > > > > > So WHAT BULLSHIT.... > > > > > > YOU DENY SECURITY PATCHES YOU FUCKTARD but my HINT WICH LEAD TO PATCHES in QWZ (YES PROOF ME HE HAD ALL THE PATCHES IN THE BACKHAND, kyrill! and that STSP KNOW OF EVERYTHING and they WAITED for the LAST MOMENT to get "MASSIVE PATCHES" into STABLE.... IS THAT NOW NORMAL PROCEDURE IN THE DEVELOPMENT? WHO TESTED The Patches? You by GETTING OFF at Linux Code or what? BUT THEY GET INCLUDED and YOU call me out? > > > > > > GET IT ADDED TO STABLE.... "in time".... the Port... > > > > > > Stuart, > > > It is not me doing Bullshit. It is you... > > > > > > Either you did not know because they where all ashamed to acknowledge it (Reminds me to the PF Bug a little bit...) or you've become dumb. > > > > > > And that I did not FORWARDED IT TO A MAILINGLIST, like you did, just shows I might yet still respect you. > > > > > > You can call me whatever but I was never a Liar... > > > > > > > > > Rother > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 20:50: > > > > > > > And yet I am Right Stuart... > > > > Just because you dislike the Messanger wont mean the Message is wrong. > > > > > > > > Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > Gesendet mit Proton Mail: Ein sicherer E-Mail-Dienst. > > > > > > > > Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 19:51: > > > > > > > > > I've had enough of your bullshit Sebastian. Please don't email me again. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 14:36:04 +0000 > > > > > To: "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > > > Subject: QWZ Driver and LibreWolf > > > > > > > > > > About what you wrote at Ports@ related to LibreWolf: > > > > > > > > > > " > > > > > what i meant by "there is no time to do that for release" is that > > > > > there's no time to do that. > > > > > " > > > > > > > > > > Then ship the QWZ-Driver also! Include it without the Patches for the Memory Managent, PLEASE! "WE HAVE NO TIME", right? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stuart, sometimes you have to make an Exception. > > > > > A better Approach would be asking the LibreWolf-Developers to provide an LTS and drop Mozilla and just include the LTS-Version. I generally would just include LTS-Versions at the Ports if possible. But that is being me... > > > > > > > > > > "this is really too late at this point." > > > > > > > > > > Since when do "we" have no TIME FOR SECURITY IN OPENBSD?! > > > > > Henning even fixed the PF Bug back then within HOURS and the Door for COMMITS where "closed". Kyrill and stsp fixed qwz.... after I bitched both hard... > > > > > > > > > > STSP even ack'ed Patches wich where simply wrong before and nobody noticed... And now you tell us all: "It is too late for Security"? > > > > > > > > > > Stuart, you will do it because it is the RIGHT THING TO DO. Otherwise reject all the QWZ-Patches.... Come on: Then be LOGICAL! TOO LATE, SORRY for you owned Boxes and the Bullshit we deliver but "we got Rules".... > > > > > Wich where back 20 Years: SECURITY FIRST... > > > > > > > > > > When did I ever asked you about a Port? And the Arguments are right: The Other Patches also went in so they where all basicly reviewed... > > > > > > > > > > Leah Rowe is right with her (my assumption, Leah sounds female in German) accusation. BE HAPPY we get People like her! > > > > > > > > > > Be happy you get People like me who blame the Devs for coding Bullshit in QWZ: but this gets into the RELEASE and they never named me once (yes I wrote Theo, he also did not mentioned me but after I mailed to him they analyzed their fucking Memory Management.. strange...) > > > > > > > > > > Make your Choice but OpenBSD is right now not in the best shape anyway. > > > > > And yes Stuart: I informed them about the qwz Driver, wich is "too late to get Patches in" related to you. If it works there: Make it possible for this Port... WHY WOULD YOU ENDAGER USERS? That makes no Sense.. > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 15:07:10 +0000 > > > > > To: "info@minifree.org" <info@minifree.org>, > > > > > "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > > > Subject: LibreWolf Port > > > > > > > > > > I just like to let you know I wrote a "informational" e-mail to Stuart. > > > > > > > > > > I found the Bugs in the MEMORY MANAGEMENT of the QWZ-Driver and bitched at kyrill and stsp to fix them and Informed Theo and even the german BSI since GENUA-Firewalls base on OpenBSD. > > > > > > > > > > Related to Stuart all these Patches need to get rejected for Release. > > > > > I asked him to make an Exception since sometimes it's required and I reminded him, that 20year before.. the Priority was always: SECURITY FIRST. > > > > > > > > > > Who remembers OpenBSD 2.1 and co anymore.. :-) > > > > > > > > > > But the Decision will be his, and his alone. > > > > > > > > > > I personally thank you for the Port because I think this Project needs support and more Attention since Mozilla became corrupted. Like I would wish Xenoncara-Devs would talk to Libre to unify Patches. > > > > > > > > > > Is there any LTS Version of LibreWolf? > > > > > And maybe we should change (later, next Release) some Config Options so that Hardwaredecoding is enabled by default. It could help to Find Bugs in the Subsystem of OpenBSD but it should be mentioned and also how Users deactivate it. > > > > > > > > > > I am sure we might find something accidently.. > > > > > > > > > > Maybe Stuart and you like to watch a little (realy short) Video: > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/shorts/b1LFe9E2DeU > > > > > > > > > > As I was 16 I cracked the Deutsche Bank network. Now as I am older and drink Wine I find Memory Management Issues (after some Alcohol) in the QWZ-Driver because I decided to come back "to the Field". Be it RX, DMA... and they get into the Release but your Patches should not even they're identical to the others... > > > > > > > > > > So I asked Stuart to include the QWZ-Driver without the Patches (you can read about them as PATCH SETS Kyrill posted at TECH@". > > > > > > > > > > I find this strange... and I was not even named since they dislike me after I found Bugs in their beloved PF (wich henning@) wich they fixed also even if the CVS was "closed" for Release.... So somehow, sometimes, it worked... as SECURITY FIRST was maybe a Paradigm... > > > > > > > > > > Stuart: A Deal you can tell Theo: > > > > > If I find Bugs I might report them. If Not I simply tell you after each Release about it. Because: QWZ TESTS the QWZ-Driver so SHORTLY before Release? "it's too late", right...? > > > > > > > > > > Why not playing this game equally... > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 15:19:58 +0000 > > > > > To: "info@minifree.org" <info@minifree.org>, > > > > > "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > > > Subject: AW: LibreWolf Port > > > > > > > > > > An information I missed to let you know: > > > > > > > > > > I never asked Stuart to do this for a Port but I see no Issues. > > > > > Not fixing the Bugs Endlagers People and Users. Otherwise I will and would have waited with my Critic about the QWZ-Driver since I was not aware "it's too short" and "No time anymore".... > > > > > > > > > > Sure you can Patch things later but I was not aware OpenBSd is now days driven like a retarded EA Computer Game who promises you to get "DAY 1 PATCHES".... > > > > > > > > > > So make your Decision Stuart. You got my Offer... you know I can find Bugs.... > > > > > > > > > > But rejecting already revied and identical Patches is simply BS.... and not logical. I mean: Ports are anyway maintained POORLY STUART.... Updates are frequently not backported to supported Releases. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:07: > > > > > > > > > > > I just like to let you know I wrote a "informational" e-mail to Stuart. > > > > > > > > > > > > I found the Bugs in the MEMORY MANAGEMENT of the QWZ-Driver and bitched at kyrill and stsp to fix them and Informed Theo and even the german BSI since GENUA-Firewalls base on OpenBSD. > > > > > > > > > > > > Related to Stuart all these Patches need to get rejected for Release. > > > > > > I asked him to make an Exception since sometimes it's required and I reminded him, that 20year before.. the Priority was always: SECURITY FIRST. > > > > > > > > > > > > Who remembers OpenBSD 2.1 and co anymore.. :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > But the Decision will be his, and his alone. > > > > > > > > > > > > I personally thank you for the Port because I think this Project needs support and more Attention since Mozilla became corrupted. Like I would wish Xenoncara-Devs would talk to Libre to unify Patches. > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there any LTS Version of LibreWolf? > > > > > > And maybe we should change (later, next Release) some Config Options so that Hardwaredecoding is enabled by default. It could help to Find Bugs in the Subsystem of OpenBSD but it should be mentioned and also how Users deactivate it. > > > > > > > > > > > > I am sure we might find something accidently.. > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe Stuart and you like to watch a little (realy short) Video: > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/shorts/b1LFe9E2DeU > > > > > > > > > > > > As I was 16 I cracked the Deutsche Bank network. Now as I am older and drink Wine I find Memory Management Issues (after some Alcohol) in the QWZ-Driver because I decided to come back "to the Field". Be it RX, DMA... and they get into the Release but your Patches should not even they're identical to the others... > > > > > > > > > > > > So I asked Stuart to include the QWZ-Driver without the Patches (you can read about them as PATCH SETS Kyrill posted at TECH@". > > > > > > > > > > > > I find this strange... and I was not even named since they dislike me after I found Bugs in their beloved PF (wich henning@) wich they fixed also even if the CVS was "closed" for Release.... So somehow, sometimes, it worked... as SECURITY FIRST was maybe a Paradigm... > > > > > > > > > > > > Stuart: A Deal you can tell Theo: > > > > > > If I find Bugs I might report them. If Not I simply tell you after each Release about it. Because: QWZ TESTS the QWZ-Driver so SHORTLY before Release? "it's too late", right...? > > > > > > > > > > > > Why not playing this game equally... > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 15:35:54 +0000 > > > > > To: "info@minifree.org" <info@minifree.org>, > > > > > "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > > > Subject: AW: LibreWolf Port > > > > > > > > > > Latest Patchset for the QWZ-Driver (and look what they "missed" accidently, DMA, RX ..memory Management. But what could get wrong in a Driver wich is in the Kernel, right? It was send on the first of this Month, her Request was send on the second. > > > > > > > > > > Is this realy the Border Stuart? Then I just mention Bugs on the SECOND of course... or the third of a Month? > > > > > > > > > > And happy GERMAN REUNIFICATION DAY :) > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:19: > > > > > > > > > > > An information I missed to let you know: > > > > > > > > > > > > I never asked Stuart to do this for a Port but I see no Issues. > > > > > > Not fixing the Bugs Endlagers People and Users. Otherwise I will and would have waited with my Critic about the QWZ-Driver since I was not aware "it's too short" and "No time anymore".... > > > > > > > > > > > > Sure you can Patch things later but I was not aware OpenBSd is now days driven like a retarded EA Computer Game who promises you to get "DAY 1 PATCHES".... > > > > > > > > > > > > So make your Decision Stuart. You got my Offer... you know I can find Bugs.... > > > > > > > > > > > > But rejecting already revied and identical Patches is simply BS.... and not logical. I mean: Ports are anyway maintained POORLY STUART.... Updates are frequently not backported to supported Releases. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:07: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just like to let you know I wrote a "informational" e-mail to Stuart. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I found the Bugs in the MEMORY MANAGEMENT of the QWZ-Driver and bitched at kyrill and stsp to fix them and Informed Theo and even the german BSI since GENUA-Firewalls base on OpenBSD. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Related to Stuart all these Patches need to get rejected for Release. > > > > > > > I asked him to make an Exception since sometimes it's required and I reminded him, that 20year before.. the Priority was always: SECURITY FIRST. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Who remembers OpenBSD 2.1 and co anymore.. :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But the Decision will be his, and his alone. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I personally thank you for the Port because I think this Project needs support and more Attention since Mozilla became corrupted. Like I would wish Xenoncara-Devs would talk to Libre to unify Patches. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there any LTS Version of LibreWolf? > > > > > > > And maybe we should change (later, next Release) some Config Options so that Hardwaredecoding is enabled by default. It could help to Find Bugs in the Subsystem of OpenBSD but it should be mentioned and also how Users deactivate it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am sure we might find something accidently.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe Stuart and you like to watch a little (realy short) Video: > > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/shorts/b1LFe9E2DeU > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As I was 16 I cracked the Deutsche Bank network. Now as I am older and drink Wine I find Memory Management Issues (after some Alcohol) in the QWZ-Driver because I decided to come back "to the Field". Be it RX, DMA... and they get into the Release but your Patches should not even they're identical to the others... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So I asked Stuart to include the QWZ-Driver without the Patches (you can read about them as PATCH SETS Kyrill posted at TECH@". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I find this strange... and I was not even named since they dislike me after I found Bugs in their beloved PF (wich henning@) wich they fixed also even if the CVS was "closed" for Release.... So somehow, sometimes, it worked... as SECURITY FIRST was maybe a Paradigm... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stuart: A Deal you can tell Theo: > > > > > > > If I find Bugs I might report them. If Not I simply tell you after each Release about it. Because: QWZ TESTS the QWZ-Driver so SHORTLY before Release? "it's too late", right...? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why not playing this game equally... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 16:00:17 +0000 > > > > > To: "info@minifree.org" <info@minifree.org>, > > > > > "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > > > Subject: AW: LibreWolf Port > > > > > > > > > > Ok Stuart, > > > > > > > > > > YOU JUST ACKNOEDLEDGED AN IMPORT for fucking APACHE.... > > > > > AT THE SAME DAY YOU ASSHOLE... > > > > > > > > > > What do you think PEOPLE DO USE MORE: APACHE or a BROWSER... > > > > > But her Update got denied? Now I start to get unfriendly... > > > > > > > > > > JUST BECAUSE YOU PIECE OF SHIT MAYBE USES APACHE "this is not too late" or what.... > > > > > > > > > > WHAT ENDAGERS MORE PEOPLE.... "an APACHE we can fix AFTER RELEASE" (YOUR WORDS YOU COWARD!) or a Browser wich People install and then wait until you fapped off at some Linux Code or whatever before you rebuild the patched Package for a BROWSER. > > > > > > > > > > DO YOUR FUCKING JOB OR LET SOMEBODY ELSE DO IT..... > > > > > > > > > > Ah it's GIOVANNI and that is why this Update gets in or what? > > > > > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=179093897725544&w=2 > > > > > > > > > > WHAT IS THE DATE STUART.... > > > > > > > > > > NO KIND REGARDS... just > > > > > ROTHER, aka "Rembrandt", Head of HELITH NETWORK.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:35: > > > > > > > > > > > Latest Patchset for the QWZ-Driver (and look what they "missed" accidently, DMA, RX ..memory Management. But what could get wrong in a Driver wich is in the Kernel, right? It was send on the first of this Month, her Request was send on the second. > > > > > > > > > > > > Is this realy the Border Stuart? Then I just mention Bugs on the SECOND of course... or the third of a Month? > > > > > > > > > > > > And happy GERMAN REUNIFICATION DAY :) > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:19: > > > > > > > > > > > > > An information I missed to let you know: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I never asked Stuart to do this for a Port but I see no Issues. > > > > > > > Not fixing the Bugs Endlagers People and Users. Otherwise I will and would have waited with my Critic about the QWZ-Driver since I was not aware "it's too short" and "No time anymore".... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sure you can Patch things later but I was not aware OpenBSd is now days driven like a retarded EA Computer Game who promises you to get "DAY 1 PATCHES".... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So make your Decision Stuart. You got my Offer... you know I can find Bugs.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But rejecting already revied and identical Patches is simply BS.... and not logical. I mean: Ports are anyway maintained POORLY STUART.... Updates are frequently not backported to supported Releases. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:07: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just like to let you know I wrote a "informational" e-mail to Stuart. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I found the Bugs in the MEMORY MANAGEMENT of the QWZ-Driver and bitched at kyrill and stsp to fix them and Informed Theo and even the german BSI since GENUA-Firewalls base on OpenBSD. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Related to Stuart all these Patches need to get rejected for Release. > > > > > > > > I asked him to make an Exception since sometimes it's required and I reminded him, that 20year before.. the Priority was always: SECURITY FIRST. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Who remembers OpenBSD 2.1 and co anymore.. :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But the Decision will be his, and his alone. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I personally thank you for the Port because I think this Project needs support and more Attention since Mozilla became corrupted. Like I would wish Xenoncara-Devs would talk to Libre to unify Patches. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there any LTS Version of LibreWolf? > > > > > > > > And maybe we should change (later, next Release) some Config Options so that Hardwaredecoding is enabled by default. It could help to Find Bugs in the Subsystem of OpenBSD but it should be mentioned and also how Users deactivate it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am sure we might find something accidently.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe Stuart and you like to watch a little (realy short) Video: > > > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/shorts/b1LFe9E2DeU > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As I was 16 I cracked the Deutsche Bank network. Now as I am older and drink Wine I find Memory Management Issues (after some Alcohol) in the QWZ-Driver because I decided to come back "to the Field". Be it RX, DMA... and they get into the Release but your Patches should not even they're identical to the others... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So I asked Stuart to include the QWZ-Driver without the Patches (you can read about them as PATCH SETS Kyrill posted at TECH@". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I find this strange... and I was not even named since they dislike me after I found Bugs in their beloved PF (wich henning@) wich they fixed also even if the CVS was "closed" for Release.... So somehow, sometimes, it worked... as SECURITY FIRST was maybe a Paradigm... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stuart: A Deal you can tell Theo: > > > > > > > > If I find Bugs I might report them. If Not I simply tell you after each Release about it. Because: QWZ TESTS the QWZ-Driver so SHORTLY before Release? "it's too late", right...? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why not playing this game equally... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 16:50:13 +0000 > > > > > To: "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > > > Subject: Volume in sndio > > > > > > > > > > Stuart, > > > > > > > > > > Even after my Critic I might got a very private Question. > > > > > I tried to read and understand sndio and it took me some while. > > > > > > > > > > Issue is: Another happy OpenBSD User but his left ear has Issues and he asked me to make the Sound louder (on the left Channel speficially of course). > > > > > > > > > > This would be the correct Code: > > > > > # Oder den linken Kanal relativ um 10% anheben > > > > > sndioctl output[0].level=+0.1 > > > > > > > > > > Could you maybe talk internally to get such an Example into the Manpage? > > > > > > > > > > Sure not everyone needs it but if you need it: I had also to read it up and such an easy Example could maybe get included. There other Examples included in the Manpage itself. :) > > > > > > > > > > No relation to the other e-Mails but it might be helpful for People. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 16:55:41 +0000 > > > > > To: "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > > > Subject: AW: Volume in sndio > > > > > > > > > > I just got another Idea: > > > > > > > > > > WHAT IS TO USE: mixerctl or sndioctl... > > > > > > > > > > Bot basicly would do the same so the Code can get factored out wich shrinks the Binaries... > > > > > > > > > > Something like > > > > > "doas mixerctl outputs.master=255,200" > > > > > Wich gets included into the .login or so but requires further Configs. Why can't a user do it without doas and co for his Session? I see no wy so far... > > > > > > > > > > So what would be the "right way"? And why are there multiple Paths? :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 18:50: > > > > > > > > > > > Stuart, > > > > > > > > > > > > Even after my Critic I might got a very private Question. > > > > > > I tried to read and understand sndio and it took me some while. > > > > > > > > > > > > Issue is: Another happy OpenBSD User but his left ear has Issues and he asked me to make the Sound louder (on the left Channel speficially of course). > > > > > > > > > > > > This would be the correct Code: > > > > > > # Oder den linken Kanal relativ um 10% anheben > > > > > > sndioctl output[0].level=+0.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you maybe talk internally to get such an Example into the Manpage? > > > > > > > > > > > > Sure not everyone needs it but if you need it: I had also to read it up and such an easy Example could maybe get included. There other Examples included in the Manpage itself. :) > > > > > > > > > > > > No relation to the other e-Mails but it might be helpful for People. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 16:58:19 +0000 > > > > > To: "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > > > Subject: AW: Volume in sndio > > > > > > > > > > I do not get it likely. sndio can do Multiplexing so a per Session is basicly possible. > > > > > > > > > > I just see Solutions for SYSTEMWIDE CHANGES, wich is not wanted.... > > > > > > > > > > In Question you lack Music: > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqvckWG2fCU > > > > > Canon in D [Original Version] (J.C. Pachelbel). > > > > > > > > > > You will enjoy it. ;) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Stuart! > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > Gesendet mit Proton Mail: Ein sicherer E-Mail-Dienst. > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 18:55: > > > > > > > > > > > I just got another Idea: > > > > > > > > > > > > WHAT IS TO USE: mixerctl or sndioctl... > > > > > > > > > > > > Bot basicly would do the same so the Code can get factored out wich shrinks the Binaries... > > > > > > > > > > > > Something like > > > > > > "doas mixerctl outputs.master=255,200" > > > > > > Wich gets included into the .login or so but requires further Configs. Why can't a user do it without doas and co for his Session? I see no wy so far... > > > > > > > > > > > > So what would be the "right way"? And why are there multiple Paths? :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 18:50: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stuart, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Even after my Critic I might got a very private Question. > > > > > > > I tried to read and understand sndio and it took me some while. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Issue is: Another happy OpenBSD User but his left ear has Issues and he asked me to make the Sound louder (on the left Channel speficially of course). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This would be the correct Code: > > > > > > > # Oder den linken Kanal relativ um 10% anheben > > > > > > > sndioctl output[0].level=+0.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you maybe talk internally to get such an Example into the Manpage? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sure not everyone needs it but if you need it: I had also to read it up and such an easy Example could maybe get included. There other Examples included in the Manpage itself. :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No relation to the other e-Mails but it might be helpful for People. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 20:23:37 +0000 To: Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org> Subject: AW: [gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com: QWZ Driver and LibreWolf] A Short Question (and this is not kidding you): DO YOU WORK or have Contacts with any Terrorism Cell either known in the EU, UK or the USA? Do you have any personal Relationship to Rusians? If not: Why do you deny to apply the Security Patches since you are, as a known Developer (known for Security, an EXPERT!), aware of the Consequences a HEAP-Manipulation could have and that even OpenBSD can not fix everything.? That will be the e-mail I gonna send them... and then people like to gonna watch and ask why.... I am seriously: You mean nothing to me... but that you risk TOUSENDS OF USERS... makes me wonder why.... Call me a LOONIE, an IDIOT: be aware the Services might listen.... So what is your Reason. Why did you did what you did? Even you knew better? Where you paid by somebody? Is it laziness? I wonder, why can't the police or the Fire brigade not excuse themself with this... Where you paid? or not paid enought? Rother Gesendet mit Proton Mail: Ein sicherer E-Mail-Dienst. Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 22:11: > Listen Stuart, you can even "claim this SLOGAN": > > In my RECENT PART I took out 3 HAMAS CELLS and other Terrorists... > Now I am "back" and bitching you and others because you fucked up.... > > Call me a Loonie, won't matter (since maybe you need to be a Loonie to do stuff..). That is why I tell you, that you might never enter the EU again.. because you do block actively Security Patches for our beloved EU Citizen... wich you are NOT (as a british). But you also might get the Attention of other Countries using OpenBSD... Canada, USA... > You ever heared about FIVE-EYES? Me neither... some Mythos from Rightwingers. > > Lets play Games Stuart.... but my Body ain't as "good" anymore... > But for some Games I am always up for.... :) You? > > And I will tell your name to other friendly Nations because you prevented a security critical Patch to get into a Release and you ris Users WILLINGFULLY. Have fun and yes I am honorable, I will let you know and set you on cc.... and this has nothing to do with OpenBSD, it is all about you then. :) > > 2 Days until I contact EuroPol about you :) And yes you get a CC... > > > WHY DO YOU FUCKING REFUSE TO LET THE SAME PATCHES IN WHERE IT IS CRITICAL BECAUSE ALL OF THEIR JS-ENGINE IS BULLSHIT. Why do you think I bitched about qwz? Why do you think I care? Could somebody maybe preparate the Stack in a way that a SYSTEM with a qwz-Driver could get owned? WHO KNOWS: For this we would need... "Experts".... > But you deliver the Brwoser for it! Awesome... > > Rother > > > And now PISS OFF STUART. > I was not kidding... > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 21:37: > > > I give you a LAST HINT wich makes the Difference even you maybe not understand it. > > > > I NEVER BLAMED kyrill, stsp, theo or anyone at a Mailinglist, yet they fixed a lot Memory management issues... > > > > You fucking british Shit did what? Wrote at ports@... > > Because you claim you DISANGREE with a PERSON who cares about Security and maybe knows why this Patch should get in. > > > > But you are too stupid for KARL and co and do not understand the Issues related to DMA and RX Registers maybe... > > > > if you please: I Could forward you the Mails to GENUA, that i blamed bluhm@ and co.... > > > > IF YOU WANT PUBLICITY: Why not go full in? > > It was never YOUR FAULT.... and not even Theo mailed to any Mailinglist... So if we go this way lets make everything Public, or? :D > > > > And this all, compared to import a Port where you are too stupid to understand the security implications... > > > > And yes you do a lousy Job... maintaining the Ports. > > > > Rother > > > > > > Gesendet mit Proton Mail: Ein sicherer E-Mail-Dienst. > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 21:24: > > > > > How about FIXING my open CVE acknowledged Security Hole in OpenSSH after like ~17+ Years Stuart? > > > > > > Just asking for a Friend if we TALK ABOUT SECURITY and not about the PERSON who maybe reports the Issue.... > > > > > > And yes, the CVE is yet "open". :) > > > Why should anyone Respect you again at a Stage after what you have done.... YOU CALL ME OUT that I care for SECURITY? Impressive... > > > > > > Why do you Piece of shit ever consider to get into the EU again.... then? We got Laws against People like you, who willingfull risk our dear EU Customers...... > > > > > > Sorry but i am pissed you sended it to ports@, for what Reason? Where do you get a better Ground or proof your argument. Should I now what... publicaly display stsp and kyrill are Idiots, their Code are junk and they risk Users by providing a Bullshitdriver? Compare you do not import a Browserpatch wich was ~97% the same to the one you included? > > > > > > > > > So what now: NOT writing you anymore... > > > Just leaving the Kids alone with their Bullshit-Code because we do not care who uses our OS anymore.... > > > > > > THAT MIGHT BE THE LAST QUESTION STUART: > > > > > > WHAT NOW, tell me.... Should I proof I wrote Theo, the BSI, GENAU and blamed bluhm@ for writing Bullshitcode too wich allowed stsp and kyrill to copy the Dirt even.... > > > > > > Answer this mail. Think carefully... > > > And all over a port "where it is too late".... but for the qwz-Driver it isn't and I am again not Name.... reminded me to the PF Issues. You Wanna know a FUNNY THING? Both where about Memory Mazement.... strange, or? > > > > > > So what shall it be: Me NEVER contacting you (I agree, it is your right, you don't need Spamfilters, compared to you I have Honor, I NEVER mailed your Mails and co to a Mailinglist)... but this was not the Issue.... and it won't get it fixed. > > > > > > You remind me of Henning, he was also stubborn. He could have become more but it was his Attitute... how did they said in "William Wallace"? The irish: he was not "Right in the Head".... > > > > > > He did not wanted to fix something either, then I reported it to other BSD Projects and VOILA.... SUPRISE MOTHERFUCKER... a PF Patch... and before I was just Asshole. > > > > > > LISTEN STUART: I don't know if you know about modern Tecnics to bypass ASLM and KARL and whatever: THE SCRIPTENGINE in MOZILAA, also in Chrome and co.. the V8-Bullshit-JS-Engine... allows a lot at the Stack. And you don#t Patch the Browser? > > > > > > KARL is even not correctly implemented but that is another Topic Stuart.... > > > > > > And I remind you: 20+ YEARS AGO I told you (not you, as the Project) to get METAMORPH LIKE A COMPUTERVIRUS... what does KARL does? Strange.... It works like a metamorphic Computervirus! INSANE.... > > > > > > And you FUCKTARDS think you all invented it.... > > > > > > Rother > > > > > > Gesendet mit Proton Mail: Ein sicherer E-Mail-Dienst. > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 20:56: > > > > > > > Just to you: > > > > > > > > I can proof I told them about the QWZ Driver... even they might deny it. I wrote to GENUA and the german BSI.... > > > > > > > > So WHAT BULLSHIT.... > > > > > > > > YOU DENY SECURITY PATCHES YOU FUCKTARD but my HINT WICH LEAD TO PATCHES in QWZ (YES PROOF ME HE HAD ALL THE PATCHES IN THE BACKHAND, kyrill! and that STSP KNOW OF EVERYTHING and they WAITED for the LAST MOMENT to get "MASSIVE PATCHES" into STABLE.... IS THAT NOW NORMAL PROCEDURE IN THE DEVELOPMENT? WHO TESTED The Patches? You by GETTING OFF at Linux Code or what? BUT THEY GET INCLUDED and YOU call me out? > > > > > > > > GET IT ADDED TO STABLE.... "in time".... the Port... > > > > > > > > Stuart, > > > > It is not me doing Bullshit. It is you... > > > > > > > > Either you did not know because they where all ashamed to acknowledge it (Reminds me to the PF Bug a little bit...) or you've become dumb. > > > > > > > > And that I did not FORWARDED IT TO A MAILINGLIST, like you did, just shows I might yet still respect you. > > > > > > > > You can call me whatever but I was never a Liar... > > > > > > > > > > > > Rother > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 20:50: > > > > > > > > > And yet I am Right Stuart... > > > > > Just because you dislike the Messanger wont mean the Message is wrong. > > > > > > > > > > Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gesendet mit Proton Mail: Ein sicherer E-Mail-Dienst. > > > > > > > > > > Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 19:51: > > > > > > > > > > > I've had enough of your bullshit Sebastian. Please don't email me again. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 14:36:04 +0000 > > > > > > To: "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > > > > Subject: QWZ Driver and LibreWolf > > > > > > > > > > > > About what you wrote at Ports@ related to LibreWolf: > > > > > > > > > > > > " > > > > > > what i meant by "there is no time to do that for release" is that > > > > > > there's no time to do that. > > > > > > " > > > > > > > > > > > > Then ship the QWZ-Driver also! Include it without the Patches for the Memory Managent, PLEASE! "WE HAVE NO TIME", right? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stuart, sometimes you have to make an Exception. > > > > > > A better Approach would be asking the LibreWolf-Developers to provide an LTS and drop Mozilla and just include the LTS-Version. I generally would just include LTS-Versions at the Ports if possible. But that is being me... > > > > > > > > > > > > "this is really too late at this point." > > > > > > > > > > > > Since when do "we" have no TIME FOR SECURITY IN OPENBSD?! > > > > > > Henning even fixed the PF Bug back then within HOURS and the Door for COMMITS where "closed". Kyrill and stsp fixed qwz.... after I bitched both hard... > > > > > > > > > > > > STSP even ack'ed Patches wich where simply wrong before and nobody noticed... And now you tell us all: "It is too late for Security"? > > > > > > > > > > > > Stuart, you will do it because it is the RIGHT THING TO DO. Otherwise reject all the QWZ-Patches.... Come on: Then be LOGICAL! TOO LATE, SORRY for you owned Boxes and the Bullshit we deliver but "we got Rules".... > > > > > > Wich where back 20 Years: SECURITY FIRST... > > > > > > > > > > > > When did I ever asked you about a Port? And the Arguments are right: The Other Patches also went in so they where all basicly reviewed... > > > > > > > > > > > > Leah Rowe is right with her (my assumption, Leah sounds female in German) accusation. BE HAPPY we get People like her! > > > > > > > > > > > > Be happy you get People like me who blame the Devs for coding Bullshit in QWZ: but this gets into the RELEASE and they never named me once (yes I wrote Theo, he also did not mentioned me but after I mailed to him they analyzed their fucking Memory Management.. strange...) > > > > > > > > > > > > Make your Choice but OpenBSD is right now not in the best shape anyway. > > > > > > And yes Stuart: I informed them about the qwz Driver, wich is "too late to get Patches in" related to you. If it works there: Make it possible for this Port... WHY WOULD YOU ENDAGER USERS? That makes no Sense.. > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 15:07:10 +0000 > > > > > > To: "info@minifree.org" <info@minifree.org>, > > > > > > "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > > > > Subject: LibreWolf Port > > > > > > > > > > > > I just like to let you know I wrote a "informational" e-mail to Stuart. > > > > > > > > > > > > I found the Bugs in the MEMORY MANAGEMENT of the QWZ-Driver and bitched at kyrill and stsp to fix them and Informed Theo and even the german BSI since GENUA-Firewalls base on OpenBSD. > > > > > > > > > > > > Related to Stuart all these Patches need to get rejected for Release. > > > > > > I asked him to make an Exception since sometimes it's required and I reminded him, that 20year before.. the Priority was always: SECURITY FIRST. > > > > > > > > > > > > Who remembers OpenBSD 2.1 and co anymore.. :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > But the Decision will be his, and his alone. > > > > > > > > > > > > I personally thank you for the Port because I think this Project needs support and more Attention since Mozilla became corrupted. Like I would wish Xenoncara-Devs would talk to Libre to unify Patches. > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there any LTS Version of LibreWolf? > > > > > > And maybe we should change (later, next Release) some Config Options so that Hardwaredecoding is enabled by default. It could help to Find Bugs in the Subsystem of OpenBSD but it should be mentioned and also how Users deactivate it. > > > > > > > > > > > > I am sure we might find something accidently.. > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe Stuart and you like to watch a little (realy short) Video: > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/shorts/b1LFe9E2DeU > > > > > > > > > > > > As I was 16 I cracked the Deutsche Bank network. Now as I am older and drink Wine I find Memory Management Issues (after some Alcohol) in the QWZ-Driver because I decided to come back "to the Field". Be it RX, DMA... and they get into the Release but your Patches should not even they're identical to the others... > > > > > > > > > > > > So I asked Stuart to include the QWZ-Driver without the Patches (you can read about them as PATCH SETS Kyrill posted at TECH@". > > > > > > > > > > > > I find this strange... and I was not even named since they dislike me after I found Bugs in their beloved PF (wich henning@) wich they fixed also even if the CVS was "closed" for Release.... So somehow, sometimes, it worked... as SECURITY FIRST was maybe a Paradigm... > > > > > > > > > > > > Stuart: A Deal you can tell Theo: > > > > > > If I find Bugs I might report them. If Not I simply tell you after each Release about it. Because: QWZ TESTS the QWZ-Driver so SHORTLY before Release? "it's too late", right...? > > > > > > > > > > > > Why not playing this game equally... > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 15:19:58 +0000 > > > > > > To: "info@minifree.org" <info@minifree.org>, > > > > > > "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > > > > Subject: AW: LibreWolf Port > > > > > > > > > > > > An information I missed to let you know: > > > > > > > > > > > > I never asked Stuart to do this for a Port but I see no Issues. > > > > > > Not fixing the Bugs Endlagers People and Users. Otherwise I will and would have waited with my Critic about the QWZ-Driver since I was not aware "it's too short" and "No time anymore".... > > > > > > > > > > > > Sure you can Patch things later but I was not aware OpenBSd is now days driven like a retarded EA Computer Game who promises you to get "DAY 1 PATCHES".... > > > > > > > > > > > > So make your Decision Stuart. You got my Offer... you know I can find Bugs.... > > > > > > > > > > > > But rejecting already revied and identical Patches is simply BS.... and not logical. I mean: Ports are anyway maintained POORLY STUART.... Updates are frequently not backported to supported Releases. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:07: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just like to let you know I wrote a "informational" e-mail to Stuart. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I found the Bugs in the MEMORY MANAGEMENT of the QWZ-Driver and bitched at kyrill and stsp to fix them and Informed Theo and even the german BSI since GENUA-Firewalls base on OpenBSD. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Related to Stuart all these Patches need to get rejected for Release. > > > > > > > I asked him to make an Exception since sometimes it's required and I reminded him, that 20year before.. the Priority was always: SECURITY FIRST. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Who remembers OpenBSD 2.1 and co anymore.. :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But the Decision will be his, and his alone. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I personally thank you for the Port because I think this Project needs support and more Attention since Mozilla became corrupted. Like I would wish Xenoncara-Devs would talk to Libre to unify Patches. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there any LTS Version of LibreWolf? > > > > > > > And maybe we should change (later, next Release) some Config Options so that Hardwaredecoding is enabled by default. It could help to Find Bugs in the Subsystem of OpenBSD but it should be mentioned and also how Users deactivate it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am sure we might find something accidently.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe Stuart and you like to watch a little (realy short) Video: > > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/shorts/b1LFe9E2DeU > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As I was 16 I cracked the Deutsche Bank network. Now as I am older and drink Wine I find Memory Management Issues (after some Alcohol) in the QWZ-Driver because I decided to come back "to the Field". Be it RX, DMA... and they get into the Release but your Patches should not even they're identical to the others... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So I asked Stuart to include the QWZ-Driver without the Patches (you can read about them as PATCH SETS Kyrill posted at TECH@". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I find this strange... and I was not even named since they dislike me after I found Bugs in their beloved PF (wich henning@) wich they fixed also even if the CVS was "closed" for Release.... So somehow, sometimes, it worked... as SECURITY FIRST was maybe a Paradigm... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stuart: A Deal you can tell Theo: > > > > > > > If I find Bugs I might report them. If Not I simply tell you after each Release about it. Because: QWZ TESTS the QWZ-Driver so SHORTLY before Release? "it's too late", right...? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why not playing this game equally... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 15:35:54 +0000 > > > > > > To: "info@minifree.org" <info@minifree.org>, > > > > > > "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > > > > Subject: AW: LibreWolf Port > > > > > > > > > > > > Latest Patchset for the QWZ-Driver (and look what they "missed" accidently, DMA, RX ..memory Management. But what could get wrong in a Driver wich is in the Kernel, right? It was send on the first of this Month, her Request was send on the second. > > > > > > > > > > > > Is this realy the Border Stuart? Then I just mention Bugs on the SECOND of course... or the third of a Month? > > > > > > > > > > > > And happy GERMAN REUNIFICATION DAY :) > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:19: > > > > > > > > > > > > > An information I missed to let you know: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I never asked Stuart to do this for a Port but I see no Issues. > > > > > > > Not fixing the Bugs Endlagers People and Users. Otherwise I will and would have waited with my Critic about the QWZ-Driver since I was not aware "it's too short" and "No time anymore".... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sure you can Patch things later but I was not aware OpenBSd is now days driven like a retarded EA Computer Game who promises you to get "DAY 1 PATCHES".... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So make your Decision Stuart. You got my Offer... you know I can find Bugs.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But rejecting already revied and identical Patches is simply BS.... and not logical. I mean: Ports are anyway maintained POORLY STUART.... Updates are frequently not backported to supported Releases. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:07: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just like to let you know I wrote a "informational" e-mail to Stuart. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I found the Bugs in the MEMORY MANAGEMENT of the QWZ-Driver and bitched at kyrill and stsp to fix them and Informed Theo and even the german BSI since GENUA-Firewalls base on OpenBSD. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Related to Stuart all these Patches need to get rejected for Release. > > > > > > > > I asked him to make an Exception since sometimes it's required and I reminded him, that 20year before.. the Priority was always: SECURITY FIRST. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Who remembers OpenBSD 2.1 and co anymore.. :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But the Decision will be his, and his alone. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I personally thank you for the Port because I think this Project needs support and more Attention since Mozilla became corrupted. Like I would wish Xenoncara-Devs would talk to Libre to unify Patches. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there any LTS Version of LibreWolf? > > > > > > > > And maybe we should change (later, next Release) some Config Options so that Hardwaredecoding is enabled by default. It could help to Find Bugs in the Subsystem of OpenBSD but it should be mentioned and also how Users deactivate it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am sure we might find something accidently.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe Stuart and you like to watch a little (realy short) Video: > > > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/shorts/b1LFe9E2DeU > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As I was 16 I cracked the Deutsche Bank network. Now as I am older and drink Wine I find Memory Management Issues (after some Alcohol) in the QWZ-Driver because I decided to come back "to the Field". Be it RX, DMA... and they get into the Release but your Patches should not even they're identical to the others... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So I asked Stuart to include the QWZ-Driver without the Patches (you can read about them as PATCH SETS Kyrill posted at TECH@". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I find this strange... and I was not even named since they dislike me after I found Bugs in their beloved PF (wich henning@) wich they fixed also even if the CVS was "closed" for Release.... So somehow, sometimes, it worked... as SECURITY FIRST was maybe a Paradigm... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stuart: A Deal you can tell Theo: > > > > > > > > If I find Bugs I might report them. If Not I simply tell you after each Release about it. Because: QWZ TESTS the QWZ-Driver so SHORTLY before Release? "it's too late", right...? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why not playing this game equally... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 16:00:17 +0000 > > > > > > To: "info@minifree.org" <info@minifree.org>, > > > > > > "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > > > > Subject: AW: LibreWolf Port > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok Stuart, > > > > > > > > > > > > YOU JUST ACKNOEDLEDGED AN IMPORT for fucking APACHE.... > > > > > > AT THE SAME DAY YOU ASSHOLE... > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think PEOPLE DO USE MORE: APACHE or a BROWSER... > > > > > > But her Update got denied? Now I start to get unfriendly... > > > > > > > > > > > > JUST BECAUSE YOU PIECE OF SHIT MAYBE USES APACHE "this is not too late" or what.... > > > > > > > > > > > > WHAT ENDAGERS MORE PEOPLE.... "an APACHE we can fix AFTER RELEASE" (YOUR WORDS YOU COWARD!) or a Browser wich People install and then wait until you fapped off at some Linux Code or whatever before you rebuild the patched Package for a BROWSER. > > > > > > > > > > > > DO YOUR FUCKING JOB OR LET SOMEBODY ELSE DO IT..... > > > > > > > > > > > > Ah it's GIOVANNI and that is why this Update gets in or what? > > > > > > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=179093897725544&w=2 > > > > > > > > > > > > WHAT IS THE DATE STUART.... > > > > > > > > > > > > NO KIND REGARDS... just > > > > > > ROTHER, aka "Rembrandt", Head of HELITH NETWORK.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:35: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Latest Patchset for the QWZ-Driver (and look what they "missed" accidently, DMA, RX ..memory Management. But what could get wrong in a Driver wich is in the Kernel, right? It was send on the first of this Month, her Request was send on the second. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is this realy the Border Stuart? Then I just mention Bugs on the SECOND of course... or the third of a Month? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And happy GERMAN REUNIFICATION DAY :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:19: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > An information I missed to let you know: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I never asked Stuart to do this for a Port but I see no Issues. > > > > > > > > Not fixing the Bugs Endlagers People and Users. Otherwise I will and would have waited with my Critic about the QWZ-Driver since I was not aware "it's too short" and "No time anymore".... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sure you can Patch things later but I was not aware OpenBSd is now days driven like a retarded EA Computer Game who promises you to get "DAY 1 PATCHES".... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So make your Decision Stuart. You got my Offer... you know I can find Bugs.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But rejecting already revied and identical Patches is simply BS.... and not logical. I mean: Ports are anyway maintained POORLY STUART.... Updates are frequently not backported to supported Releases. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:07: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just like to let you know I wrote a "informational" e-mail to Stuart. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I found the Bugs in the MEMORY MANAGEMENT of the QWZ-Driver and bitched at kyrill and stsp to fix them and Informed Theo and even the german BSI since GENUA-Firewalls base on OpenBSD. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Related to Stuart all these Patches need to get rejected for Release. > > > > > > > > > I asked him to make an Exception since sometimes it's required and I reminded him, that 20year before.. the Priority was always: SECURITY FIRST. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Who remembers OpenBSD 2.1 and co anymore.. :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But the Decision will be his, and his alone. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I personally thank you for the Port because I think this Project needs support and more Attention since Mozilla became corrupted. Like I would wish Xenoncara-Devs would talk to Libre to unify Patches. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there any LTS Version of LibreWolf? > > > > > > > > > And maybe we should change (later, next Release) some Config Options so that Hardwaredecoding is enabled by default. It could help to Find Bugs in the Subsystem of OpenBSD but it should be mentioned and also how Users deactivate it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am sure we might find something accidently.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe Stuart and you like to watch a little (realy short) Video: > > > > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/shorts/b1LFe9E2DeU > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As I was 16 I cracked the Deutsche Bank network. Now as I am older and drink Wine I find Memory Management Issues (after some Alcohol) in the QWZ-Driver because I decided to come back "to the Field". Be it RX, DMA... and they get into the Release but your Patches should not even they're identical to the others... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So I asked Stuart to include the QWZ-Driver without the Patches (you can read about them as PATCH SETS Kyrill posted at TECH@". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I find this strange... and I was not even named since they dislike me after I found Bugs in their beloved PF (wich henning@) wich they fixed also even if the CVS was "closed" for Release.... So somehow, sometimes, it worked... as SECURITY FIRST was maybe a Paradigm... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stuart: A Deal you can tell Theo: > > > > > > > > > If I find Bugs I might report them. If Not I simply tell you after each Release about it. Because: QWZ TESTS the QWZ-Driver so SHORTLY before Release? "it's too late", right...? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why not playing this game equally... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 16:50:13 +0000 > > > > > > To: "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > > > > Subject: Volume in sndio > > > > > > > > > > > > Stuart, > > > > > > > > > > > > Even after my Critic I might got a very private Question. > > > > > > I tried to read and understand sndio and it took me some while. > > > > > > > > > > > > Issue is: Another happy OpenBSD User but his left ear has Issues and he asked me to make the Sound louder (on the left Channel speficially of course). > > > > > > > > > > > > This would be the correct Code: > > > > > > # Oder den linken Kanal relativ um 10% anheben > > > > > > sndioctl output[0].level=+0.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you maybe talk internally to get such an Example into the Manpage? > > > > > > > > > > > > Sure not everyone needs it but if you need it: I had also to read it up and such an easy Example could maybe get included. There other Examples included in the Manpage itself. :) > > > > > > > > > > > > No relation to the other e-Mails but it might be helpful for People. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 16:55:41 +0000 > > > > > > To: "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > > > > Subject: AW: Volume in sndio > > > > > > > > > > > > I just got another Idea: > > > > > > > > > > > > WHAT IS TO USE: mixerctl or sndioctl... > > > > > > > > > > > > Bot basicly would do the same so the Code can get factored out wich shrinks the Binaries... > > > > > > > > > > > > Something like > > > > > > "doas mixerctl outputs.master=255,200" > > > > > > Wich gets included into the .login or so but requires further Configs. Why can't a user do it without doas and co for his Session? I see no wy so far... > > > > > > > > > > > > So what would be the "right way"? And why are there multiple Paths? :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 18:50: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stuart, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Even after my Critic I might got a very private Question. > > > > > > > I tried to read and understand sndio and it took me some while. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Issue is: Another happy OpenBSD User but his left ear has Issues and he asked me to make the Sound louder (on the left Channel speficially of course). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This would be the correct Code: > > > > > > > # Oder den linken Kanal relativ um 10% anheben > > > > > > > sndioctl output[0].level=+0.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you maybe talk internally to get such an Example into the Manpage? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sure not everyone needs it but if you need it: I had also to read it up and such an easy Example could maybe get included. There other Examples included in the Manpage itself. :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No relation to the other e-Mails but it might be helpful for People. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 16:58:19 +0000 > > > > > > To: "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > > > > Subject: AW: Volume in sndio > > > > > > > > > > > > I do not get it likely. sndio can do Multiplexing so a per Session is basicly possible. > > > > > > > > > > > > I just see Solutions for SYSTEMWIDE CHANGES, wich is not wanted.... > > > > > > > > > > > > In Question you lack Music: > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqvckWG2fCU > > > > > > Canon in D [Original Version] (J.C. Pachelbel). > > > > > > > > > > > > You will enjoy it. ;) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Stuart! > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > Gesendet mit Proton Mail: Ein sicherer E-Mail-Dienst. > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 18:55: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just got another Idea: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > WHAT IS TO USE: mixerctl or sndioctl... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bot basicly would do the same so the Code can get factored out wich shrinks the Binaries... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Something like > > > > > > > "doas mixerctl outputs.master=255,200" > > > > > > > Wich gets included into the .login or so but requires further Configs. Why can't a user do it without doas and co for his Session? I see no wy so far... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So what would be the "right way"? And why are there multiple Paths? :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 18:50: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stuart, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Even after my Critic I might got a very private Question. > > > > > > > > I tried to read and understand sndio and it took me some while. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Issue is: Another happy OpenBSD User but his left ear has Issues and he asked me to make the Sound louder (on the left Channel speficially of course). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This would be the correct Code: > > > > > > > > # Oder den linken Kanal relativ um 10% anheben > > > > > > > > sndioctl output[0].level=+0.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you maybe talk internally to get such an Example into the Manpage? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sure not everyone needs it but if you need it: I had also to read it up and such an easy Example could maybe get included. There other Examples included in the Manpage itself. :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No relation to the other e-Mails but it might be helpful for People. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 20:36:21 +0000 To: Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org> Subject: AW: [gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com: QWZ Driver and LibreWolf] Just to let you know... Lets say they assumed I was hacking and this Computer itself might be bugged... I never cared about a REINSTALL... And I know they read the Mails and co.... Why? because they wanna find more terrorists or those they support... Welcome to the Club, not kidding.. Rother Gesendet mit Proton Mail: Ein sicherer E-Mail-Dienst. Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 22:23: > A Short Question (and this is not kidding you): > > DO YOU WORK or have Contacts with any Terrorism Cell either known in the EU, UK or the USA? Do you have any personal Relationship to Rusians? > > > If not: Why do you deny to apply the Security Patches since you are, as a known Developer (known for Security, an EXPERT!), aware of the Consequences a HEAP-Manipulation could have and that even OpenBSD can not fix everything.? > > > That will be the e-mail I gonna send them... and then people like to gonna watch and ask why.... > > I am seriously: You mean nothing to me... but that you risk TOUSENDS OF USERS... makes me wonder why.... > > Call me a LOONIE, an IDIOT: be aware the Services might listen.... > So what is your Reason. Why did you did what you did? Even you knew better? Where you paid by somebody? Is it laziness? I wonder, why can't the police or the Fire brigade not excuse themself with this... > > Where you paid? or not paid enought? > > > > > Rother > Gesendet mit Proton Mail: Ein sicherer E-Mail-Dienst. > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 22:11: > > > Listen Stuart, you can even "claim this SLOGAN": > > > > In my RECENT PART I took out 3 HAMAS CELLS and other Terrorists... > > Now I am "back" and bitching you and others because you fucked up.... > > > > Call me a Loonie, won't matter (since maybe you need to be a Loonie to do stuff..). That is why I tell you, that you might never enter the EU again.. because you do block actively Security Patches for our beloved EU Citizen... wich you are NOT (as a british). But you also might get the Attention of other Countries using OpenBSD... Canada, USA... > > You ever heared about FIVE-EYES? Me neither... some Mythos from Rightwingers. > > > > Lets play Games Stuart.... but my Body ain't as "good" anymore... > > But for some Games I am always up for.... :) You? > > > > And I will tell your name to other friendly Nations because you prevented a security critical Patch to get into a Release and you ris Users WILLINGFULLY. Have fun and yes I am honorable, I will let you know and set you on cc.... and this has nothing to do with OpenBSD, it is all about you then. :) > > > > 2 Days until I contact EuroPol about you :) And yes you get a CC... > > > > > > WHY DO YOU FUCKING REFUSE TO LET THE SAME PATCHES IN WHERE IT IS CRITICAL BECAUSE ALL OF THEIR JS-ENGINE IS BULLSHIT. Why do you think I bitched about qwz? Why do you think I care? Could somebody maybe preparate the Stack in a way that a SYSTEM with a qwz-Driver could get owned? WHO KNOWS: For this we would need... "Experts".... > > But you deliver the Brwoser for it! Awesome... > > > > Rother > > > > > > And now PISS OFF STUART. > > I was not kidding... > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 21:37: > > > > > I give you a LAST HINT wich makes the Difference even you maybe not understand it. > > > > > > I NEVER BLAMED kyrill, stsp, theo or anyone at a Mailinglist, yet they fixed a lot Memory management issues... > > > > > > You fucking british Shit did what? Wrote at ports@... > > > Because you claim you DISANGREE with a PERSON who cares about Security and maybe knows why this Patch should get in. > > > > > > But you are too stupid for KARL and co and do not understand the Issues related to DMA and RX Registers maybe... > > > > > > if you please: I Could forward you the Mails to GENUA, that i blamed bluhm@ and co.... > > > > > > IF YOU WANT PUBLICITY: Why not go full in? > > > It was never YOUR FAULT.... and not even Theo mailed to any Mailinglist... So if we go this way lets make everything Public, or? :D > > > > > > And this all, compared to import a Port where you are too stupid to understand the security implications... > > > > > > And yes you do a lousy Job... maintaining the Ports. > > > > > > Rother > > > > > > > > > Gesendet mit Proton Mail: Ein sicherer E-Mail-Dienst. > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 21:24: > > > > > > > How about FIXING my open CVE acknowledged Security Hole in OpenSSH after like ~17+ Years Stuart? > > > > > > > > Just asking for a Friend if we TALK ABOUT SECURITY and not about the PERSON who maybe reports the Issue.... > > > > > > > > And yes, the CVE is yet "open". :) > > > > Why should anyone Respect you again at a Stage after what you have done.... YOU CALL ME OUT that I care for SECURITY? Impressive... > > > > > > > > Why do you Piece of shit ever consider to get into the EU again.... then? We got Laws against People like you, who willingfull risk our dear EU Customers...... > > > > > > > > Sorry but i am pissed you sended it to ports@, for what Reason? Where do you get a better Ground or proof your argument. Should I now what... publicaly display stsp and kyrill are Idiots, their Code are junk and they risk Users by providing a Bullshitdriver? Compare you do not import a Browserpatch wich was ~97% the same to the one you included? > > > > > > > > > > > > So what now: NOT writing you anymore... > > > > Just leaving the Kids alone with their Bullshit-Code because we do not care who uses our OS anymore.... > > > > > > > > THAT MIGHT BE THE LAST QUESTION STUART: > > > > > > > > WHAT NOW, tell me.... Should I proof I wrote Theo, the BSI, GENAU and blamed bluhm@ for writing Bullshitcode too wich allowed stsp and kyrill to copy the Dirt even.... > > > > > > > > Answer this mail. Think carefully... > > > > And all over a port "where it is too late".... but for the qwz-Driver it isn't and I am again not Name.... reminded me to the PF Issues. You Wanna know a FUNNY THING? Both where about Memory Mazement.... strange, or? > > > > > > > > So what shall it be: Me NEVER contacting you (I agree, it is your right, you don't need Spamfilters, compared to you I have Honor, I NEVER mailed your Mails and co to a Mailinglist)... but this was not the Issue.... and it won't get it fixed. > > > > > > > > You remind me of Henning, he was also stubborn. He could have become more but it was his Attitute... how did they said in "William Wallace"? The irish: he was not "Right in the Head".... > > > > > > > > He did not wanted to fix something either, then I reported it to other BSD Projects and VOILA.... SUPRISE MOTHERFUCKER... a PF Patch... and before I was just Asshole. > > > > > > > > LISTEN STUART: I don't know if you know about modern Tecnics to bypass ASLM and KARL and whatever: THE SCRIPTENGINE in MOZILAA, also in Chrome and co.. the V8-Bullshit-JS-Engine... allows a lot at the Stack. And you don#t Patch the Browser? > > > > > > > > KARL is even not correctly implemented but that is another Topic Stuart.... > > > > > > > > And I remind you: 20+ YEARS AGO I told you (not you, as the Project) to get METAMORPH LIKE A COMPUTERVIRUS... what does KARL does? Strange.... It works like a metamorphic Computervirus! INSANE.... > > > > > > > > And you FUCKTARDS think you all invented it.... > > > > > > > > Rother > > > > > > > > Gesendet mit Proton Mail: Ein sicherer E-Mail-Dienst. > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 20:56: > > > > > > > > > Just to you: > > > > > > > > > > I can proof I told them about the QWZ Driver... even they might deny it. I wrote to GENUA and the german BSI.... > > > > > > > > > > So WHAT BULLSHIT.... > > > > > > > > > > YOU DENY SECURITY PATCHES YOU FUCKTARD but my HINT WICH LEAD TO PATCHES in QWZ (YES PROOF ME HE HAD ALL THE PATCHES IN THE BACKHAND, kyrill! and that STSP KNOW OF EVERYTHING and they WAITED for the LAST MOMENT to get "MASSIVE PATCHES" into STABLE.... IS THAT NOW NORMAL PROCEDURE IN THE DEVELOPMENT? WHO TESTED The Patches? You by GETTING OFF at Linux Code or what? BUT THEY GET INCLUDED and YOU call me out? > > > > > > > > > > GET IT ADDED TO STABLE.... "in time".... the Port... > > > > > > > > > > Stuart, > > > > > It is not me doing Bullshit. It is you... > > > > > > > > > > Either you did not know because they where all ashamed to acknowledge it (Reminds me to the PF Bug a little bit...) or you've become dumb. > > > > > > > > > > And that I did not FORWARDED IT TO A MAILINGLIST, like you did, just shows I might yet still respect you. > > > > > > > > > > You can call me whatever but I was never a Liar... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rother > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 20:50: > > > > > > > > > > > And yet I am Right Stuart... > > > > > > Just because you dislike the Messanger wont mean the Message is wrong. > > > > > > > > > > > > Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gesendet mit Proton Mail: Ein sicherer E-Mail-Dienst. > > > > > > > > > > > > Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 19:51: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've had enough of your bullshit Sebastian. Please don't email me again. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > > > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 14:36:04 +0000 > > > > > > > To: "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > > > > > Subject: QWZ Driver and LibreWolf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > About what you wrote at Ports@ related to LibreWolf: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " > > > > > > > what i meant by "there is no time to do that for release" is that > > > > > > > there's no time to do that. > > > > > > > " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then ship the QWZ-Driver also! Include it without the Patches for the Memory Managent, PLEASE! "WE HAVE NO TIME", right? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stuart, sometimes you have to make an Exception. > > > > > > > A better Approach would be asking the LibreWolf-Developers to provide an LTS and drop Mozilla and just include the LTS-Version. I generally would just include LTS-Versions at the Ports if possible. But that is being me... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "this is really too late at this point." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since when do "we" have no TIME FOR SECURITY IN OPENBSD?! > > > > > > > Henning even fixed the PF Bug back then within HOURS and the Door for COMMITS where "closed". Kyrill and stsp fixed qwz.... after I bitched both hard... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > STSP even ack'ed Patches wich where simply wrong before and nobody noticed... And now you tell us all: "It is too late for Security"? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stuart, you will do it because it is the RIGHT THING TO DO. Otherwise reject all the QWZ-Patches.... Come on: Then be LOGICAL! TOO LATE, SORRY for you owned Boxes and the Bullshit we deliver but "we got Rules".... > > > > > > > Wich where back 20 Years: SECURITY FIRST... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When did I ever asked you about a Port? And the Arguments are right: The Other Patches also went in so they where all basicly reviewed... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Leah Rowe is right with her (my assumption, Leah sounds female in German) accusation. BE HAPPY we get People like her! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be happy you get People like me who blame the Devs for coding Bullshit in QWZ: but this gets into the RELEASE and they never named me once (yes I wrote Theo, he also did not mentioned me but after I mailed to him they analyzed their fucking Memory Management.. strange...) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Make your Choice but OpenBSD is right now not in the best shape anyway. > > > > > > > And yes Stuart: I informed them about the qwz Driver, wich is "too late to get Patches in" related to you. If it works there: Make it possible for this Port... WHY WOULD YOU ENDAGER USERS? That makes no Sense.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > > > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 15:07:10 +0000 > > > > > > > To: "info@minifree.org" <info@minifree.org>, > > > > > > > "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > > > > > Subject: LibreWolf Port > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just like to let you know I wrote a "informational" e-mail to Stuart. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I found the Bugs in the MEMORY MANAGEMENT of the QWZ-Driver and bitched at kyrill and stsp to fix them and Informed Theo and even the german BSI since GENUA-Firewalls base on OpenBSD. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Related to Stuart all these Patches need to get rejected for Release. > > > > > > > I asked him to make an Exception since sometimes it's required and I reminded him, that 20year before.. the Priority was always: SECURITY FIRST. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Who remembers OpenBSD 2.1 and co anymore.. :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But the Decision will be his, and his alone. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I personally thank you for the Port because I think this Project needs support and more Attention since Mozilla became corrupted. Like I would wish Xenoncara-Devs would talk to Libre to unify Patches. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there any LTS Version of LibreWolf? > > > > > > > And maybe we should change (later, next Release) some Config Options so that Hardwaredecoding is enabled by default. It could help to Find Bugs in the Subsystem of OpenBSD but it should be mentioned and also how Users deactivate it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am sure we might find something accidently.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe Stuart and you like to watch a little (realy short) Video: > > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/shorts/b1LFe9E2DeU > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As I was 16 I cracked the Deutsche Bank network. Now as I am older and drink Wine I find Memory Management Issues (after some Alcohol) in the QWZ-Driver because I decided to come back "to the Field". Be it RX, DMA... and they get into the Release but your Patches should not even they're identical to the others... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So I asked Stuart to include the QWZ-Driver without the Patches (you can read about them as PATCH SETS Kyrill posted at TECH@". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I find this strange... and I was not even named since they dislike me after I found Bugs in their beloved PF (wich henning@) wich they fixed also even if the CVS was "closed" for Release.... So somehow, sometimes, it worked... as SECURITY FIRST was maybe a Paradigm... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stuart: A Deal you can tell Theo: > > > > > > > If I find Bugs I might report them. If Not I simply tell you after each Release about it. Because: QWZ TESTS the QWZ-Driver so SHORTLY before Release? "it's too late", right...? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why not playing this game equally... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > > > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 15:19:58 +0000 > > > > > > > To: "info@minifree.org" <info@minifree.org>, > > > > > > > "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > > > > > Subject: AW: LibreWolf Port > > > > > > > > > > > > > > An information I missed to let you know: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I never asked Stuart to do this for a Port but I see no Issues. > > > > > > > Not fixing the Bugs Endlagers People and Users. Otherwise I will and would have waited with my Critic about the QWZ-Driver since I was not aware "it's too short" and "No time anymore".... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sure you can Patch things later but I was not aware OpenBSd is now days driven like a retarded EA Computer Game who promises you to get "DAY 1 PATCHES".... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So make your Decision Stuart. You got my Offer... you know I can find Bugs.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But rejecting already revied and identical Patches is simply BS.... and not logical. I mean: Ports are anyway maintained POORLY STUART.... Updates are frequently not backported to supported Releases. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:07: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just like to let you know I wrote a "informational" e-mail to Stuart. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I found the Bugs in the MEMORY MANAGEMENT of the QWZ-Driver and bitched at kyrill and stsp to fix them and Informed Theo and even the german BSI since GENUA-Firewalls base on OpenBSD. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Related to Stuart all these Patches need to get rejected for Release. > > > > > > > > I asked him to make an Exception since sometimes it's required and I reminded him, that 20year before.. the Priority was always: SECURITY FIRST. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Who remembers OpenBSD 2.1 and co anymore.. :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But the Decision will be his, and his alone. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I personally thank you for the Port because I think this Project needs support and more Attention since Mozilla became corrupted. Like I would wish Xenoncara-Devs would talk to Libre to unify Patches. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there any LTS Version of LibreWolf? > > > > > > > > And maybe we should change (later, next Release) some Config Options so that Hardwaredecoding is enabled by default. It could help to Find Bugs in the Subsystem of OpenBSD but it should be mentioned and also how Users deactivate it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am sure we might find something accidently.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe Stuart and you like to watch a little (realy short) Video: > > > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/shorts/b1LFe9E2DeU > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As I was 16 I cracked the Deutsche Bank network. Now as I am older and drink Wine I find Memory Management Issues (after some Alcohol) in the QWZ-Driver because I decided to come back "to the Field". Be it RX, DMA... and they get into the Release but your Patches should not even they're identical to the others... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So I asked Stuart to include the QWZ-Driver without the Patches (you can read about them as PATCH SETS Kyrill posted at TECH@". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I find this strange... and I was not even named since they dislike me after I found Bugs in their beloved PF (wich henning@) wich they fixed also even if the CVS was "closed" for Release.... So somehow, sometimes, it worked... as SECURITY FIRST was maybe a Paradigm... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stuart: A Deal you can tell Theo: > > > > > > > > If I find Bugs I might report them. If Not I simply tell you after each Release about it. Because: QWZ TESTS the QWZ-Driver so SHORTLY before Release? "it's too late", right...? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why not playing this game equally... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > > > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 15:35:54 +0000 > > > > > > > To: "info@minifree.org" <info@minifree.org>, > > > > > > > "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > > > > > Subject: AW: LibreWolf Port > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Latest Patchset for the QWZ-Driver (and look what they "missed" accidently, DMA, RX ..memory Management. But what could get wrong in a Driver wich is in the Kernel, right? It was send on the first of this Month, her Request was send on the second. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is this realy the Border Stuart? Then I just mention Bugs on the SECOND of course... or the third of a Month? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And happy GERMAN REUNIFICATION DAY :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:19: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > An information I missed to let you know: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I never asked Stuart to do this for a Port but I see no Issues. > > > > > > > > Not fixing the Bugs Endlagers People and Users. Otherwise I will and would have waited with my Critic about the QWZ-Driver since I was not aware "it's too short" and "No time anymore".... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sure you can Patch things later but I was not aware OpenBSd is now days driven like a retarded EA Computer Game who promises you to get "DAY 1 PATCHES".... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So make your Decision Stuart. You got my Offer... you know I can find Bugs.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But rejecting already revied and identical Patches is simply BS.... and not logical. I mean: Ports are anyway maintained POORLY STUART.... Updates are frequently not backported to supported Releases. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:07: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just like to let you know I wrote a "informational" e-mail to Stuart. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I found the Bugs in the MEMORY MANAGEMENT of the QWZ-Driver and bitched at kyrill and stsp to fix them and Informed Theo and even the german BSI since GENUA-Firewalls base on OpenBSD. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Related to Stuart all these Patches need to get rejected for Release. > > > > > > > > > I asked him to make an Exception since sometimes it's required and I reminded him, that 20year before.. the Priority was always: SECURITY FIRST. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Who remembers OpenBSD 2.1 and co anymore.. :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But the Decision will be his, and his alone. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I personally thank you for the Port because I think this Project needs support and more Attention since Mozilla became corrupted. Like I would wish Xenoncara-Devs would talk to Libre to unify Patches. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there any LTS Version of LibreWolf? > > > > > > > > > And maybe we should change (later, next Release) some Config Options so that Hardwaredecoding is enabled by default. It could help to Find Bugs in the Subsystem of OpenBSD but it should be mentioned and also how Users deactivate it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am sure we might find something accidently.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe Stuart and you like to watch a little (realy short) Video: > > > > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/shorts/b1LFe9E2DeU > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As I was 16 I cracked the Deutsche Bank network. Now as I am older and drink Wine I find Memory Management Issues (after some Alcohol) in the QWZ-Driver because I decided to come back "to the Field". Be it RX, DMA... and they get into the Release but your Patches should not even they're identical to the others... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So I asked Stuart to include the QWZ-Driver without the Patches (you can read about them as PATCH SETS Kyrill posted at TECH@". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I find this strange... and I was not even named since they dislike me after I found Bugs in their beloved PF (wich henning@) wich they fixed also even if the CVS was "closed" for Release.... So somehow, sometimes, it worked... as SECURITY FIRST was maybe a Paradigm... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stuart: A Deal you can tell Theo: > > > > > > > > > If I find Bugs I might report them. If Not I simply tell you after each Release about it. Because: QWZ TESTS the QWZ-Driver so SHORTLY before Release? "it's too late", right...? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why not playing this game equally... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > > > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 16:00:17 +0000 > > > > > > > To: "info@minifree.org" <info@minifree.org>, > > > > > > > "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > > > > > Subject: AW: LibreWolf Port > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok Stuart, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > YOU JUST ACKNOEDLEDGED AN IMPORT for fucking APACHE.... > > > > > > > AT THE SAME DAY YOU ASSHOLE... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think PEOPLE DO USE MORE: APACHE or a BROWSER... > > > > > > > But her Update got denied? Now I start to get unfriendly... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JUST BECAUSE YOU PIECE OF SHIT MAYBE USES APACHE "this is not too late" or what.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > WHAT ENDAGERS MORE PEOPLE.... "an APACHE we can fix AFTER RELEASE" (YOUR WORDS YOU COWARD!) or a Browser wich People install and then wait until you fapped off at some Linux Code or whatever before you rebuild the patched Package for a BROWSER. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DO YOUR FUCKING JOB OR LET SOMEBODY ELSE DO IT..... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ah it's GIOVANNI and that is why this Update gets in or what? > > > > > > > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=179093897725544&w=2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > WHAT IS THE DATE STUART.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > NO KIND REGARDS... just > > > > > > > ROTHER, aka "Rembrandt", Head of HELITH NETWORK.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:35: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Latest Patchset for the QWZ-Driver (and look what they "missed" accidently, DMA, RX ..memory Management. But what could get wrong in a Driver wich is in the Kernel, right? It was send on the first of this Month, her Request was send on the second. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is this realy the Border Stuart? Then I just mention Bugs on the SECOND of course... or the third of a Month? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And happy GERMAN REUNIFICATION DAY :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:19: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > An information I missed to let you know: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I never asked Stuart to do this for a Port but I see no Issues. > > > > > > > > > Not fixing the Bugs Endlagers People and Users. Otherwise I will and would have waited with my Critic about the QWZ-Driver since I was not aware "it's too short" and "No time anymore".... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sure you can Patch things later but I was not aware OpenBSd is now days driven like a retarded EA Computer Game who promises you to get "DAY 1 PATCHES".... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So make your Decision Stuart. You got my Offer... you know I can find Bugs.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But rejecting already revied and identical Patches is simply BS.... and not logical. I mean: Ports are anyway maintained POORLY STUART.... Updates are frequently not backported to supported Releases. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 17:07: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just like to let you know I wrote a "informational" e-mail to Stuart. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I found the Bugs in the MEMORY MANAGEMENT of the QWZ-Driver and bitched at kyrill and stsp to fix them and Informed Theo and even the german BSI since GENUA-Firewalls base on OpenBSD. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Related to Stuart all these Patches need to get rejected for Release. > > > > > > > > > > I asked him to make an Exception since sometimes it's required and I reminded him, that 20year before.. the Priority was always: SECURITY FIRST. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Who remembers OpenBSD 2.1 and co anymore.. :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But the Decision will be his, and his alone. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I personally thank you for the Port because I think this Project needs support and more Attention since Mozilla became corrupted. Like I would wish Xenoncara-Devs would talk to Libre to unify Patches. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there any LTS Version of LibreWolf? > > > > > > > > > > And maybe we should change (later, next Release) some Config Options so that Hardwaredecoding is enabled by default. It could help to Find Bugs in the Subsystem of OpenBSD but it should be mentioned and also how Users deactivate it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am sure we might find something accidently.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe Stuart and you like to watch a little (realy short) Video: > > > > > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/shorts/b1LFe9E2DeU > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As I was 16 I cracked the Deutsche Bank network. Now as I am older and drink Wine I find Memory Management Issues (after some Alcohol) in the QWZ-Driver because I decided to come back "to the Field". Be it RX, DMA... and they get into the Release but your Patches should not even they're identical to the others... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So I asked Stuart to include the QWZ-Driver without the Patches (you can read about them as PATCH SETS Kyrill posted at TECH@". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I find this strange... and I was not even named since they dislike me after I found Bugs in their beloved PF (wich henning@) wich they fixed also even if the CVS was "closed" for Release.... So somehow, sometimes, it worked... as SECURITY FIRST was maybe a Paradigm... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stuart: A Deal you can tell Theo: > > > > > > > > > > If I find Bugs I might report them. If Not I simply tell you after each Release about it. Because: QWZ TESTS the QWZ-Driver so SHORTLY before Release? "it's too late", right...? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why not playing this game equally... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > > > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 16:50:13 +0000 > > > > > > > To: "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > > > > > Subject: Volume in sndio > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stuart, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Even after my Critic I might got a very private Question. > > > > > > > I tried to read and understand sndio and it took me some while. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Issue is: Another happy OpenBSD User but his left ear has Issues and he asked me to make the Sound louder (on the left Channel speficially of course). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This would be the correct Code: > > > > > > > # Oder den linken Kanal relativ um 10% anheben > > > > > > > sndioctl output[0].level=+0.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you maybe talk internally to get such an Example into the Manpage? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sure not everyone needs it but if you need it: I had also to read it up and such an easy Example could maybe get included. There other Examples included in the Manpage itself. :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No relation to the other e-Mails but it might be helpful for People. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > > > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 16:55:41 +0000 > > > > > > > To: "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > > > > > Subject: AW: Volume in sndio > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just got another Idea: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > WHAT IS TO USE: mixerctl or sndioctl... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bot basicly would do the same so the Code can get factored out wich shrinks the Binaries... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Something like > > > > > > > "doas mixerctl outputs.master=255,200" > > > > > > > Wich gets included into the .login or so but requires further Configs. Why can't a user do it without doas and co for his Session? I see no wy so far... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So what would be the "right way"? And why are there multiple Paths? :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 18:50: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stuart, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Even after my Critic I might got a very private Question. > > > > > > > > I tried to read and understand sndio and it took me some while. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Issue is: Another happy OpenBSD User but his left ear has Issues and he asked me to make the Sound louder (on the left Channel speficially of course). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This would be the correct Code: > > > > > > > > # Oder den linken Kanal relativ um 10% anheben > > > > > > > > sndioctl output[0].level=+0.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you maybe talk internally to get such an Example into the Manpage? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sure not everyone needs it but if you need it: I had also to read it up and such an easy Example could maybe get included. There other Examples included in the Manpage itself. :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No relation to the other e-Mails but it might be helpful for People. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> ----- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> > > > > > > > Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 16:58:19 +0000 > > > > > > > To: "stu@spacehopper.org" <stu@spacehopper.org> > > > > > > > Subject: AW: Volume in sndio > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I do not get it likely. sndio can do Multiplexing so a per Session is basicly possible. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just see Solutions for SYSTEMWIDE CHANGES, wich is not wanted.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In Question you lack Music: > > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqvckWG2fCU > > > > > > > Canon in D [Original Version] (J.C. Pachelbel). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You will enjoy it. ;) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Stuart! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gesendet mit Proton Mail: Ein sicherer E-Mail-Dienst. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 18:55: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just got another Idea: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > WHAT IS TO USE: mixerctl or sndioctl... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bot basicly would do the same so the Code can get factored out wich shrinks the Binaries... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Something like > > > > > > > > "doas mixerctl outputs.master=255,200" > > > > > > > > Wich gets included into the .login or so but requires further Configs. Why can't a user do it without doas and co for his Session? I see no wy so far... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So what would be the "right way"? And why are there multiple Paths? :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother <gerd.sebastian.rother@protonmail.com> schrieb am Samstag, 3. Oktober 2026 um 18:50: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stuart, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Even after my Critic I might got a very private Question. > > > > > > > > > I tried to read and understand sndio and it took me some while. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Issue is: Another happy OpenBSD User but his left ear has Issues and he asked me to make the Sound louder (on the left Channel speficially of course). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This would be the correct Code: > > > > > > > > > # Oder den linken Kanal relativ um 10% anheben > > > > > > > > > sndioctl output[0].level=+0.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you maybe talk internally to get such an Example into the Manpage? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sure not everyone needs it but if you need it: I had also to read it up and such an easy Example could maybe get included. There other Examples included in the Manpage itself. :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No relation to the other e-Mails but it might be helpful for People. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > > > Sebastian Rother > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > > > > ----- End forwarded message -----