-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=POzz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hi,
Please reboot your machine, and at the prompt bsd>,
specify 'boot bsd.mp' ...
As you see, with my station:
$ uname -a
OpenBSD *** 6.1 GENERIC.MP#2 amd64
;)
Le 05/03/17 à 03:00, Aaron Riekenberg a écrit :
> Have a 6.1 amd64 MP system running the generic MP kernel from the
> installation. MP was automatically chosen by the installer - this is an
> Intel Atom 330 dual core box.
>
> Ran syspatch today which installed 4 new patches:
>
> $ syspatch -l
> 001_dhcpd
> 002_vmmfpu
> 003_libressl
> 004_softraid_concat
>
>
> One issue is, after installing patches with syspatch and rebooting I'm now
> running the SP kernel instead of MP:
>
> $ uname -a
> OpenBSD server.localdomain 6.1 GENERIC#4 amd64
>
> $ sysctl hw.ncpu
> hw.ncpu=1
>
>
> After the default installation - hw.ncpu was 2 and I was running the MP
> kernel.
>
> Looking at rollback files in /var/syspatch (see below), it looks like 2
> patches updated the kernel - 002_vmmfpu and 004_softraid_concat.
> Interestingly 002_vmmfpu only seems to have updated /bsd (not /bsd.mp), but
> 004_softraid_concat updated both.
>
> So I *think* if I moved /bsd.mp to /bsd manually I would have a fully
> patched MP kernel - since presumably the 004 kernel includes the 002
> patch. Have not tried this yet.
>
> This manual step seems like a bug. Would imagine more people have MP
> machines than SP these days.
>
> /var/syspatch$ tar ztvf ./61-002_vmmfpu/rollback.tgz
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 10751939 Apr 22 05:26 ./bsd
> -r--r--r-- 1 root bin 7321 Sep 4 2016
> ./usr/include/amd64/cpufunc.h
> -r--r--r-- 1 root bin 1832 Mar 26 2015
> ./usr/include/amd64/fpu.h
> -r--r--r-- 1 root bin 20593 Mar 23 12:58
> ./usr/include/amd64/vmmvar.h
> -r--r--r-- 1 root bin 7321 Sep 4 2016
> ./usr/include/machine/cpufunc.h
> -r--r--r-- 1 root bin 1832 Mar 26 2015
> ./usr/include/machine/fpu.h
> -r--r--r-- 1 root bin 20593 Mar 23 12:58
> ./usr/include/machine/vmmvar.h
>
> /var/syspatch$ tar ztvf ./61-004_softraid_concat/rollback.tgz
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 10684150 May 2 19:34 ./bsd
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 10756231 May 2 19:34 ./bsd.mp
>
> $ ls -latrh /bsd*
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 10.2M Apr 22 05:26 /bsd.sp
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 9.0M Apr 22 05:26 /bsd.rd
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 10.2M May 2 19:35 /bsd
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 10.3M May 2 19:35 /bsd.mp
>
--
~ " Fully Basic System Distinguish Life! " ~ " Libre as a BSD " +=<<<
----
<me>Stephane HUC as PengouinBSD or CIOTBSD</me>
<mail>bsd@stephane-huc.net</mail>
No comments:
Post a Comment