Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org> writes:
> On 2017/07/03 15:50, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>> Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org> writes:
>>
>> > This makes sense to me, any differing opinions?
>>
>> Makes sense.
>>
>> libmtp builds fine with clang from base on amd64. If the same can be
>> said about misp64el, then maybe
>>
>> COMPILER=base gcc
>> MODGCC4_ARCHS= misp64el
>>
>> would be nicer in the long run.
>
> This would just be
>
> COMPILER= gcc
> MODGCC4_ARCHS= mips64el
> COMPILER_LANGS= c
>
> We don't have clang on mips64el anyway,
Oops...
> but if we were to ever get it,
> that would avoid having to change it later. So I think that would be the
> right thing to do.
>
>> > I would add a comment explaining what it's for, just something like
>> > << # avoid "libmtp.so.7.0: undefined reference to `.L2085'" >>
>>
>> ack
>
> So in total:
ok jca@
[...]
--
jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
No comments:
Post a Comment