> On 05.07.2017, at 11:50, Kapetanakis Giannis <bilias@edu.physics.uoc.gr> wrote:
>
> On 05/07/17 12:45, Reyk Floeter wrote:
>>
>>> On 05.07.2017, at 11:41, Kapetanakis Giannis <bilias@edu.physics.uoc.gr> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 04/07/17 19:09, Reyk Floeter wrote:
>>>> Could you try again with the attached diff? It doesn't change
>>>> behavior but it adds some chatty logging when a packet is rejected.
>>>> Maybe it helps to find the issue.
>>>>
>>>> Reyk
>>>
>>> I've send the bug report as detailed as I could.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks, now it is a good bug report and I think it helps to find the issue with carp+dhcrelay.
>>
>> You had a typo in the email subject ;-)
>>
>>> In a few words, applying your diff gave me these:
>>> Jul 5 11:53:09 dhcrelay[68565]: decode_hw_header:229: invalid htype 0
>>> Jul 5 11:53:09 dhcrelay[68565]: receive_packet:457: decode_hw_header failed, len 364
>>> Jul 5 11:53:10 dhcrelay[68565]: decode_hw_header:229: invalid htype 0
>>> Jul 5 11:53:10 dhcrelay[68565]: receive_packet:457: decode_hw_header failed, len 364
>>>
>>
>> Reyk
>>
>
> oops :))
>
> sorry for that, do you want me to send it again with the correct subject so it's archived ok?
>
> G
>
No, no, it's fine. The content of the mail is more important.
Reyk
No comments:
Post a Comment