dnsdist-1.2.0

while looking for something else I noticed that dnsdist has a security
update ("On a 32-bit system, the pointer arithmetic used when parsing
the received response to remove that record might trigger an undefined
behavior leading to a crash"), is this port update ok?

https://dnsdist.org/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-for-dnsdist-2017-01.html

Index: Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/dnsdist/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.7 Makefile
--- Makefile 26 Jul 2017 22:45:27 -0000 1.7
+++ Makefile 1 Sep 2017 14:37:03 -0000
@@ -2,14 +2,12 @@

COMMENT= highly DNS-, DoS- and abuse-aware loadbalancer

-DISTNAME= dnsdist-1.1.0
+DISTNAME= dnsdist-1.2.0
EXTRACT_SUFX= .tar.bz2

-REVISION= 1
-
CATEGORIES= net

-HOMEPAGE= http://dnsdist.org/
+HOMEPAGE= https://dnsdist.org/

MAINTAINER= Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>

@@ -25,7 +23,8 @@ AUTOCONF_VERSION= 2.69
USE_GMAKE= Yes

CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --disable-hardening \
- --with-lua
+ --with-lua \
+ --without-net-snmp
CONFIGURE_ENV+= CPPFLAGS="-I${LOCALBASE}/include" \
LDFLAGS="-L${LOCALBASE}/lib" \
LIBEDIT_LIBS='-ledit -lcurses' \
Index: distinfo
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/dnsdist/distinfo,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
diff -u -p -r1.1.1.1 distinfo
--- distinfo 15 Jan 2017 17:13:33 -0000 1.1.1.1
+++ distinfo 1 Sep 2017 14:37:03 -0000
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-SHA256 (dnsdist-1.1.0.tar.bz2) = tKHokxttBaJElPVCJCEcDeDusfX/Fw9rn1ZlIZv+r8I=
-SIZE (dnsdist-1.1.0.tar.bz2) = 874837
+SHA256 (dnsdist-1.2.0.tar.bz2) = mIXJ7orHB2rt5YbqWNRkLrh357LXbJAiVElOKlpfqng=
+SIZE (dnsdist-1.2.0.tar.bz2) = 876104
Index: patches/patch-configure_ac
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ports/net/dnsdist/patches/patch-configure_ac,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
diff -u -p -r1.1.1.1 patch-configure_ac
--- patches/patch-configure_ac 15 Jan 2017 17:13:33 -0000 1.1.1.1
+++ patches/patch-configure_ac 1 Sep 2017 14:37:03 -0000
@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
$OpenBSD: patch-configure_ac,v 1.1.1.1 2017/01/15 17:13:33 sthen Exp $
---- configure.ac.orig Thu Jan 12 21:38:07 2017
-+++ configure.ac Thu Jan 12 21:38:11 2017
-@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ PROGRAM_LDFLAGS="$PIE_LDFLAGS $PROGRAM_LDFLAGS"
+Index: configure.ac
+--- configure.ac.orig
++++ configure.ac
+@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ PROGRAM_LDFLAGS="$PIE_LDFLAGS $PROGRAM_LDFLAGS"
AC_SUBST([PROGRAM_LDFLAGS])

AC_SUBST([AM_CPPFLAGS],
Index: patches/patch-ext_json11_json11_cpp
===================================================================
RCS file: patches/patch-ext_json11_json11_cpp
diff -N patches/patch-ext_json11_json11_cpp
--- patches/patch-ext_json11_json11_cpp 27 May 2017 06:21:43 -0000 1.1
+++ /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
@@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
-$OpenBSD: patch-ext_json11_json11_cpp,v 1.1 2017/05/27 06:21:43 espie Exp $
-nullptrs are not comparable. patch from FreeBSD
-
-Index: ext/json11/json11.cpp
---- ext/json11/json11.cpp.orig
-+++ ext/json11/json11.cpp
-@@ -37,11 +37,21 @@ using std::make_shared;
- using std::initializer_list;
- using std::move;
-
-+/* Helper for representing null - just a do-nothing struct, plus comparison
-+ * operators so the helpers in JsonValue work. We can't use nullptr_t because
-+ * it may not be orderable.
-+*/
-+
-+struct NullStruct {
-+ bool operator==(NullStruct) const { return true; }
-+ bool operator<(NullStruct) const { return false; }
-+};
-+
- /* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
- * Serialization
- */
-
--static void dump(std::nullptr_t, string &out) {
-+static void dump(NullStruct, string &out) {
- out += "null";
- }
-
-@@ -204,9 +214,9 @@ class JsonObject final : public Value<Json::OBJECT, Js
- explicit JsonObject(Json::object &&value) : Value(move(value)) {}
- };
-
--class JsonNull final : public Value<Json::NUL, std::nullptr_t> {
-+class JsonNull final : public Value<Json::NUL, NullStruct> {
- public:
-- JsonNull() : Value(nullptr) {}
-+ JsonNull() : Value({}) {}
- };
-
- /* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *