Hi,
Am 29.09.2017 um 15:39 schrieb Larry Hynes:
> Markus Rosjat <rosjat@ghweb.de> wrote:
>> my boss is getting on my nerves
>
> It may be mutual.
>
of course but well :)
>> that greylisting is basically out of date because of things like
>> outlook.com and mails ending up delayed for ever. So the next logical
>> step would be to deploy a tool like rspamd or spamassasin to examin
>> mail content. These tools need to be trained and if you have a small
>> mailserver with less accounts this could take a while I imagine.
>
> Specifically in relation to rspamd: If you spend some time reading
> the documentation on the rspamd website you might find that:
>
> 1. the weight of rules which classify messages as 'ham' or 'spam'
> i.e. those rules which rely on the 'training' of messages, does not
> have to be, in the overall context, critical. rspamd deploys a
> boatload of 'tests', by default, and even more can be enabled, and
> each of those can be assigned a score. hamminess or spamminess is
> just one 'test'.
>
> 2. That the rspamd website specifically links to 'pre-built' ham
> and spam databases which you are free to download and use.
>
I'll check this out !
Thank you for the hint !!!
regards
--
Markus Rosjat fon: +49 351 8107223 mail: rosjat@ghweb.de
G+H Webservice GbR Gorzolla, Herrmann
Königsbrücker Str. 70, 01099 Dresden
http://www.ghweb.de
fon: +49 351 8107220 fax: +49 351 8107227
Bitte prüfen Sie, ob diese Mail wirklich ausgedruckt werden muss! Before
you print it, think about your responsibility and commitment to the
ENVIRONMENT
No comments:
Post a Comment