On 2018/01/25 04:07, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:10:55PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > On Tue Jan 23, 2018 at 12:43:36AM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > > +
> > > # libarchive (bsdtar) used as an alternative to atool; see scope.sh patch
> > > RUN_DEPENDS = archivers/libarchive \
> > > - textproc/py-chardet
> > > + devel/desktop-file-utils \
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > +@exec %D/bin/update-desktop-database
> > > +@unexec-delete %D/bin/update-desktop-database
> > >
> >
> > Please don't pull that in for a console file manager.
> Those came in for completeness (portcheck also complains without them)
> but I can see why one would rather ignore it.
I wonder if we should come up with a better policy for console apps with
desktop files, as obviously it's useful to update the database if you
*do* have a desktop environment.
Any thoughts on using "@exec %D/bin/update-desktop-database || true" (etc)
and not listing the desktop-file-utils dep *only* for console apps?
What do you think Antoine?
No comments:
Post a Comment