Thanks for your fast answer.
I thought before, that the manual triage was the point.
Would the devs accept / use a bug tracker ? I ask because I find start
something without the devs is burning time (see the .ru domain, the UI
posts ... ).
If someone of the developers is interested a off list discussion could
maybe help.
Regards,
Christoph
> Hi Christoph,
>
> Christoph R. Murauer wrote on Sun, Apr 01, 2018 at 01:56:47PM +0200:
>
>> not a problem from the OpenBSD developers ?
>
> There *is* an actual problem: Some bug reports are not processed
> immediately because at the time they are posted, nobody happens to
> find the time to investigate. Later on, when somebody would have
> time to look, such unprocessd reports have low visibility because
> they are nothing but an old posting on a mailing list, drowning in
> a lot of noise from invalid and resolved reports.
>
> The task of a bugtracker would be
>
> 1. to collect as FEW as possible tickets -
> ideally only valid, unprocessed ones with complete information
>
> 2. to close them when resolved such that the number of open tickets
> stays low
>
> That's why manual triage and curation is the crucial point.
>
> Yours,
> Ingo
>
No comments:
Post a Comment