Re: NEW: x11/kde-applications/ktouch

On Thu Apr 26, 2018 at 10:43:14PM +0300, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> 2018-04-26 21:58 GMT+03:00 Rafael Sadowski <rafael@sizeofvoid.org>:
> > Please find attached next new KDE4 replacement.
> >
> > Conflict bits are set:
> >
> > @conflict ktouch-<17.12.3
> > @conflict kdebase-*
> > @pkgpath x11/kde4/ktouch
> >
> > $ cat x11/kde-applications/ktouch/pkg/DESCR
> > KTouch is a typing learning tool for KDE.
> >
> > It is a part of KDE Edu project.
> >
> > Ok? Commenst?
>
> Well, ktouch conflicts with ktouch by definition, so the first
> @conflict shouldn't be needed. :)

That was exactly the idea of not allowing either.

The question is: do we want to replace everything step by step but how
if we set conflict with kdebase-*. That doesn't make much sense to me.
Or do we want KDE4 || KDE5 Application?

I think teh following is wrong:

> > @conflict ktouch-<17.12.3
> > @conflict kdebase-*
> > @pkgpath x11/kde4/ktouch

Because "@pkgpath x11/kde4/*" is in conflict with "@conflict kdebase-*"

I prefer it like now. x11/kde4 OR x11/kde-applications/*:

> > @conflict ktouch-<17.12.3
> > @conflict kdebase-*

without pkgpath.

I would be happy to hear the opinion of our pro porters!?

>
> IIRC, I've added such markers to
> stuff under x11/kde-applications initially, thinking about
> co-installation of KDE4 and KDE5 ones. But later I realized that they
> co-exist more or less fine anyway, and dropped kde5- prefix idea, but
> forgot about @conflict markers.
>
> Sorry for missing similar thing in kate port as well.
>