On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 10:39:44PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2018/07/29 00:47, Brian Callahan wrote:
> >
> > On 07/28/18 17:24, Frederic Cambus wrote:
> > > Hi ports@,
> > >
> > > Lynx 2.8.9 stable has finally been released, so here is a diff to
> > > update to this version. Unless I'm mistaken, bumping EPOCH is required
> > > here so users are updated from lynx-2.8.9pl19 to lynx-2.8.9.
> >
> > Why not just make it lynx-2.8.9pl20? Does it really matter if upstream
> > switched to a rel naming? A user who cares about the version string that
> > badly will check it themselves after installation, no?
> Think I prefer EPOCH to pl20 which doesn't match up with anything
> version-wise..
I'm not keen on bypassing upstream release version scheme either, so
that's why I went with the EPOCH option. If nobody objects I would
like to commit the diff as is. Any OKs?
> For next time if using 'dev' releases, they should be named 'pre'
> (or maybe 'beta' or something) instead of 'pl'.
Note taken, will see if staying on stable releases make more sense in
the future.
No comments:
Post a Comment