On 07/30/18 10:58, Frederic Cambus wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 10:39:44PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2018/07/29 00:47, Brian Callahan wrote:
>>> On 07/28/18 17:24, Frederic Cambus wrote:
>>>> Hi ports@,
>>>>
>>>> Lynx 2.8.9 stable has finally been released, so here is a diff to
>>>> update to this version. Unless I'm mistaken, bumping EPOCH is required
>>>> here so users are updated from lynx-2.8.9pl19 to lynx-2.8.9.
>>> Why not just make it lynx-2.8.9pl20? Does it really matter if upstream
>>> switched to a rel naming? A user who cares about the version string that
>>> badly will check it themselves after installation, no?
>> Think I prefer EPOCH to pl20 which doesn't match up with anything
>> version-wise..
> I'm not keen on bypassing upstream release version scheme either, so
> that's why I went with the EPOCH option. If nobody objects I would
> like to commit the diff as is. Any OKs?
>
No objections from me.
~Brian
>> For next time if using 'dev' releases, they should be named 'pre'
>> (or maybe 'beta' or something) instead of 'pl'.
> Note taken, will see if staying on stable releases make more sense in
> the future.
No comments:
Post a Comment