>> Hi Stuart and Kristaps,
>>
>> Stuart Henderson wrote on Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 07:57:25PM +0100:
>>
>>> I'd never expect to find this in multimedia... misc seems
>>> perfect?
>>
>> I don't object to misc either and trust Stuart's judgement on this
>> one.
>>
>> But i think libdivecomputer should have the same main category as
>> subsurface, keeping all the diving ports close together. No
>> objection to keeping them all in misc. I understand that even
>> though it installs a shared library (which is not yet used by any
>> other port), libdivecomputer can also be used standalone via the
>> dctool(1) command line program included in the libdivecomputer
>> port.
>
> I very much agree.
Enclosed are both subsurface.tgz and libdivecomputer.tgz, which have the
noted change. (Both are now in misc.) Both tested on amd64.
(I do have a utility that uses libdivecomputer and will submit it soon.)
Thank you!
No comments:
Post a Comment