Thursday, August 30, 2018

Re: [NEW] devel/wabt

On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 06:49:34PM -0400, Brian Callahan wrote:
>
> On 08/30/18 18:35, Brian Callahan wrote:
> > Hi Fabian --
> >
> > On 08/30/18 17:28, Fabian Raetz wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 05:12:35PM -0400, Brian Callahan wrote:
> > > > Hi Fabian --
> > > >
> > > > On 08/30/18 16:42, Fabian Raetz wrote:
> > > > > Hi all.
> > > > >
> > > > > i've been using the "WebAssembly Binary Toolkit" lately and
> > > > > thought i create a
> > > > > proper port for it.
> > > > >
> > > > > The port doesn't support running the tests as they require
> > > > > some git submodules including
> > > > > the gtest source. Sadly, my cmake skills are not good enough
> > > > > to make the build system
> > > > > use gtest from ports so i decided against it for the moment.
> > > > >
> > > > > In case you wanna compile a small WebAssembly programm
> > > > > yourself, take a look at
> > > > > https://jameshfisher.com/2017/10/13/webassembly-hello-world.html
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Fabian
> > > > >
> > > > > HOMEPAGE: https://github.com/WebAssembly/wabt
> > > > >
> > > > > DESCR:
> > > > > WABT (we pronounce it "wabbit") is a suite of tools for
> > > > > WebAssembly, including:
> > > > >
> > > > > wat2wasm:     translate from WebAssembly text format to the
> > > > > WebAssembly binary
> > > > >                 format
> > > > > wasm2wat:     the inverse of wat2wasm, translate from the
> > > > > binary format back
> > > > >         to the text format (also known as a .wat)
> > > > > wasm-objdump:     print information about a wasm binary.
> > > > > Similiar to objdump.
> > > > > wasm-interp:     decode and run a WebAssembly binary file
> > > > > using a stack-based
> > > > >                    interpreter
> > > > > wat-desugar:     parse .wat text form as supported by the
> > > > > spec interpreter
> > > > >                    (s-expressions, flat syntax, or mixed)
> > > > > and print "canonical"
> > > > >                    flat format
> > > > > wasm2c:     convert a WebAssembly binary file to a C source and header
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > Is this different from the wabt port I ok'd here?
> > > > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=152950481400669&w=2
> > > There are some subtle differences. The port I sent is in the
> > > category "devel"
> > > instead of "lang". Also, I packaged version 1.0.5 where the local
> > > patch is
> > > already included. DESCR is also slightly different with regards to
> > > formating.
> > >
> > > Otherwise both port are equal :)
> >
> > I changed the DESCR formatting to be different than both of them:
> > ---
> > WABT (we pronounce it "wabbit") is a suite of tools for WebAssembly,
> > including:
> >
> > wat2wasm:
> >   translate from WebAssembly text format to the WebAssembly binary format
> >
> > wasm2wat:
> >   the inverse of wat2wasm, translate from the binary format back to the
> >   text format (also known as a .wat)
> >
> > wasm-objdump:
> >   print information about a wasm binary. Similiar to objdump.
> >
> > wasm-interp:
> >   decode and run a WebAssembly binary file using a stack-based
> > interpreter
> >
> > wat-desugar:
> >   parse .wat text form as supported by the spec interpreter
> >   (s-expressions, flat syntax, or mixed) and print "canonical" flat
> > format
> >
> > wasm2c:
> >   convert a WebAssembly binary file to a C source and header
> > ---


Thanks for your review :)

I attached a new tar which integrates your feedback. Some comments inline ...

> >
> > It reads better for my eyes but I guess these things eventually become a
> > matter of opinion.
> >
> > On the more necessary side of things:
> > * the build picks up a -Werror that has to go

I patched the CMakeLists.txt. Is there a better way to this?

> > * CMake will pick up re2c if you have it installed so either set
> > -DRUN_RE2C=OFF in CONFIGURE_ARGS or add a BDEP on re2c.

Added the BDEP because the option is on by default.

> > * It's C++11, so needs a COMPILER line.

Done.

> > * It looks for, and finds, python. Do we need to add MODULES=lang/python?
> >
> > There's no MAINTAINER. Either of you want to do it?

I would take it and added myself as MAINTAINER if that's ok for Raphael

> >
>
> And now that I think about it, I think I like this living in lang/. devel/
> is overloaded, and we can at least justify this one living somewhere else.

Done.

>
> ~Brian
>
> > ~Brian
> >
> > > > I'm still waiting for an OK to import that one.
> > > >
> > > > ~Brian
> >
>

No comments:

Post a Comment