> I don't think the fortran module is needed, is it? IIUC libgfortran in
> WANTLIB is only here because of blas and lapack. On a related note
Nope, module is not needed.
> I don't understand the point of patch-CMakeLists_txt.
It's necessary, armadillo doesn't link without it.
Probably to be fixed upstream in blas/lapack which don't have the
requisite NEEDED on libgfortran, but I definitely don't want to look
inside lapack/blas.
> I would suggest using "base-clang ports-gcc" for COMPILER, so that only
> ports-gcc is needed on non-clang archs, instead of ports-clang +
> ports-gcc (the latter needed for blas and lapack).
Indeed.
No comments:
Post a Comment