Hi,
The double comma thing: I thought that was a typo which happened to work, but I'm willing to be proven wrong!
The man path: it was the only way I could get the man page to go into the right place. I'll try again over the next few days in case I screwed up.
Cheers!
--
Edd Barrett
On 27 Dec 2018, 17:38, at 17:38, Landry Breuil <landry@openbsd.org> wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 05:21:46PM +0000, Edd Barrett wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I hope you are all enjoying the holidays!
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 12:13:46PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
>> > > > editors/texworks
>> > >
>> > > https://github.com/TeXworks/texworks/releases seem to say that
>qt5 is
>> > > supported
>> >
>> > Our version is from 2012, and qt5 is the default since 0.6 per
>> >
>https://raw.githubusercontent.com/TeXworks/texworks/release-0.6.2/NEWS
>-
>> > edd@, care to update it ?
>>
>> Here's an update to TeX Works, now using QT5. It wasn't totally
>> straightforward, but I got there in the end.
>>
>> Notes:
>> - Build system switched to cmake.
>> - Docs no longer distributed with TeX Works (other than a small man
>page).
>> - This update will break TeX Live 2018 (not yet committed) due to a
>synctex
>> API change. I have patches to fix this when the time comes.
>
>Well i dont use it but it builds & packages fine, and generally looks
>good. Im just not 100% sure about the dependency moving from
>poppler,,-qt4 to poppler,-qt5 (iirc there's a reason for the ,, - ie
>no
>flavor ? any flavor ?)
>
>You set -DTeXworks_MAN_DIR=man in CONFIGURE_ARGS but later patch it out
>in patches/patch-src_CMakeLists_txt, is that intended ?
>
>other than that, if it works for you, okay.
>
>Landry
No comments:
Post a Comment