On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 12:06:56AM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 11:34:49PM -0400, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> > Someone asked me to look at porting tootstream. It needs the two new ports
> > I sent yesterday, py-humanize and py-emoji but otherwise uses things
> > Pamela already ported like py-mastodon.py. I honestly expected to have
> > to fight it more. It worked just fine for me on bsd.network.
> HOMEPAGE has TLS, space after MODPY_PYTEST's "=", otherwise OK kn.
> I'd also add the following version specs to *DEPS as per
> src/tootstream.egg-info/requires.txt, but that's up to you:
> click>=6.7
> Mastodon.py==1.3.1
> colored>=1.3.5
> humanize>=0.5.1
> emoji>=0.4.5
I guess when our version was already greater than the requirements I
had been leaving version specifiers off. I figured I haven't seen us
going to earlier versions of python ports.
Is it considered a good practice to put those in even in those cases?
--Kurt
No comments:
Post a Comment