On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 03:56:34PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20 2019, Kurt Mosiejczuk <kurt@cranky.work> wrote:
> > Paco Esteban just had trouble running the tests for py-commonmark because
> > the module needs itself installed to run the tests. This simple diff
> > adds itself to the TEST_DEPENDS to fix that.
> Not objecting, but there's another approach which I tend to prefer: use
> PYTHONPATH so that the tested code is the code actually being built and
> packaged. Skipping the update/reinstall step also makes testing updates
> easier.
> Suggested approach, "624 tests passed, 0 failed" both with py2
> and py3.
Oh. I like this *much* better. This is immediately going in my toolbox.
Do you know if it ever breaks things to have PYTHONPATH="."? Would it be
worth having the lang/python module do that automatically?
--Kurt
No comments:
Post a Comment