On Sun, 28 Jul 2019, Nathan Hartman wrote:
> *IF* the OpenBSD devs ever wants to change SCMs--I said **IF**--then I
> root for Subversion. Subversion offers the following advantages:
If wants to change just for changing, then there are reasons to select
something else? I realy do not understand this logic that drives this
discussion.
What I like of CVS: rcs textfiles, transparency, no strange db. That
is a reason for which I would decide for CVS and nothing else for a
bigger project.
I use fossil for my small programs, better said, misuse, because I
do not use it as a real SCM, but just for backuping history. And I
like it very much.
Rodrigo
No comments:
Post a Comment