On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 09:44:51PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2019/07/02 21:48, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 07:02:04PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 12:21:50PM -0400, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> > > > I think it would be indeed nice to provide a way for people to easily
> > > > see the content of the ports tree without having to take the sqlite3 db
> > > > out from sqlports.tgz.
> > > >
> > > > Regarding the JSON, I think only one, with as much info as
> > > > possible with avoiding bloat, should be provided. And they should have
> > > > the field names ;)
> > >
> > > as for repology, in the meantime i've hacked my way to extract
> > > ports-INDEX from portslist package in
> > > http://ftp.fr.openbsd.org/pub/ports-INDEX to hopefully fix
> > > https://github.com/repology/repology/issues/149, because right now it's
> > > showing misleading info.
>
> "That's the best I can do in the current situation." -> well, removing
> OpenBSD from the list would be better than that... Surely with the amount
> of parsing they're doing they noticed the old INDEX file in cvs was junk
> with duplicate entries etc anyway?
Those guys just don't want to be bothered.
We don't matter enough for them to do some decent job out of it.
No comments:
Post a Comment