Friday, August 30, 2019

Re: [NEW] www/e2guardian

On 2019/08/30 10:30, Robert Nagy wrote:
> On 29/08/19 20:47 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > Additional comment, isn't it going to need sslmitm to be enabled if it's going
> > to do anything useful with the current state of the 'net?
> >
>
> Well not really. For example in my use case it is only used for filtering.
> Blocking specific website groups and allowing some of them during lunch hours.
>
> Since every client is forced to use the proxy, https filtering will work with
> the CONNECT method. The only drawback of this is that you don't get redirected
> to the blocked page if you are using https, but you will get an ssl error instead.
>
> --
> Robert Nagy
>

The main reason to use dansguardian/e2guardian is the content filtering
though, if you're just blocking by time/site name pretty much anything can
handle that (squid/trafficserver/..)

No comments:

Post a Comment