On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 2:22 PM Charlene Wendling <julianaito@posteo.jp>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 13:32:52 -0500
> Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
>
> > On Friday, August 30, 2019, wen heping <wenheping2000@hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Here is a patch for databases/p5-Mojo-Pg:
> > > i) Update to 4.15
> > > ii) Fix LICENSE to artistic 2.0
> > >
> >
> > Hi Wen,
> >
> > I think that perl implied artistic 2.0, is that on longer true? (Or
> > has it never been true? )
>
> It's true, but artistic 2.0 per se does not imply Perl as a license
> marker (may it be for CPAN or for us).
>
> Perl is distributed under either the GPL or Artistic 2.0 [0], and only
> modules mentioning the dual licensing, or the famous "under the same
> terms as Perl itself" should have the Perl license marker.
>
> Mojo-Pg is released only under the term of the Artistic 2.0 license
> [1], so the fix is real.
>
You are correct. OK maintaner
thanks
>
> OK cwen@
>
>
> [0] https://dev.perl.org/licenses/
> [1] https://metacpan.org/pod/Mojo::Pg#COPYRIGHT-AND-LICENSE
>
>
No comments:
Post a Comment