Re the first submission you pointed out, here is the comment:
- programmable MUD client, but beta rather than stable
This doesn't sound like something we want in ports.
(Also in general, new ports are always trickier because there's a policy of
always needing a second developer ok to commit them, so you need to get two
dev's interested in it!)
Second one: diff please! Don't forget the REVISION bump.
--
Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting.
On 28 September 2019 06:15:12 Andras Farkas <deepbluemistake@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 3:34 PM Chris Bennett
> <cpb_ports@bennettconstruction.us> wrote:
>> Port something.
> Last time I ported something I got no reply and gave up.
> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=148150979321732&w=2
>> Update something.
> Similar story there:
> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=156583823801955&w=2
> https://cvsweb.openbsd.org/ports/math/hoc/
>
> I'd be willing to try again, though.
No comments:
Post a Comment