On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 12:36:20AM -0400, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 12:51:20AM +0200, clematis wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 01:23:43PM -0400, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> > > There's also the python 2.7 flavor to test. There's also 9 ports that use
> > > it as a TEST_DEPENDS (that number expands to 12 for RUN_DEPENDS). Did you
> > > test those?
>
> > In regards to python 2.7: 2 failed, 1097 passed
>
> Is that the same number as the old version? If so, maybe not a big deal.
> If they are new, we might want to check.
The previous version had 874 tests which all pass successfully.
But these 2 new failure have now been fixed upstream. [1]
> > /usr/ports/databases/py-ldap,python3
> > test: failed (would need to investigate further)
>
> Did it fail before your change? I'm guessing so since I just tried it and
> it didn't work. In which case, probably not a big deal.
Correct. This was failing before the change but I didn't investigate this more.
> > /usr/ports/devel/py-asn1-modules,python3
> > test: OK (93 passed)
>
> Is 93 all of them? I don't know the number off the top of my head :)
> I'm guessing yes, so good.
Correct. Total 93 passed. (and still do as I've redone all tests today)
> > I will also run some more tests with py2.7.
Here's the results (amd64):
/usr/ports/security/py-cryptography
test: 96549 passed, 10427 skipped
install: OK
/usr/ports/security/py-service_identity
test: OK (total of 99 passed)
install: OK
/usr/ports/security/py-paramiko
test: 137 ran, 67errors
install: OK
/usr/ports/security/letsencrypt/py-acme
test: No regression tests for py-acme-0.38.0
install: OK
/usr/ports/www/py-ndg-httpsclient
test: run=14 errors=8 failures=1 (as before)
install: OK
/usr/ports/security/py-rsa
test: OK 74 passed 1 error
install: OK
Comments? OK?
[1] https://frama.link/github-pyasn1
--
clematis (0x7e96fd2400fe7b59)
No comments:
Post a Comment