On 2019/11/04 10:45, Edd Barrett wrote:
> Hi Stuart,
>
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 10:34:52AM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > If it turns out we need libluv for things other than neovim, then that's
> > probably the simplest way (different directories rather than filenames
> > usually make it easier to point other ports at the right one) - but
> > for now this feels like a sane approach.
>
> So do I read it correctly that we should continue using the bundled luv
> until another port needs it too? Or do we bite the bullet and just do
> the luv port form the outset?
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Edd Barrett
>
> http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk
>
Yes I think bundled. When there's another actual user we'll have some idea
which lua version it needs, etc.
No comments:
Post a Comment