On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 at 04:11:50PM -0400, Jon Bernard wrote:
> I submitted this some time back [1], and here's what I maintain
> personally [2]. I think the shell completions should be named to match
> the port to prevent possible collisions. Otherwise it looks good to me.
Thanks, I did not look into the archives.
jasper's argument of the script not being meant for packaging no longer
holds true and I consider `pkg_add leiningen' to get a working REPL
worth adding this port (again).
Good catch on the shell completions, I fixed them to be
share/bash_completion.d/lein and share/zsh/site-functions/_lein, thanks.
Except for a new PLIST there's nothing else changed in the new tarball.
OK?
No comments:
Post a Comment