+cc phessler who hit the same problem.
On Fri, Nov 01 2019, Matthieu Herrb <matthieu@openbsd.org> wrote:
> Ok, so here is a correct patch.
> The problem is that makeint.h considers that __arm is not really
> POSIX.1 compliant. I think it was meant to only apply to SVR3 ?
I'm not sure about that:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/make.git/commit/?id=660a23d6493910c3cf5fa0699811d1c1c3f3e655
But I guess your patch would have almost the same result as removing
__arm from those tests.
> But any variant that fixes the condition on OpenBSD is ok.
Yes, but IMHO it would be better if the fix conveyed the right message.
Could you please consider the diff below instead? (Untested)
> I've left the patch for the missing semi-column in place, although
> this code should never be used.
Index: patches/patch-job_c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/gmake/patches/patch-job_c,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.2 patch-job_c
--- patches/patch-job_c 13 Sep 2019 16:59:34 -0000 1.2
+++ patches/patch-job_c 1 Nov 2019 10:01:40 -0000
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ Index: job.c
+static void
+unblock_sigs ()
+{
-+ sigsetmask (siggetmask (0) & ~fatal_signal_mask)
++ sigsetmask (siggetmask (0) & ~fatal_signal_mask);
+}
+
+void
Index: patches/patch-makeint_h
===================================================================
RCS file: patches/patch-makeint_h
diff -N patches/patch-makeint_h
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ patches/patch-makeint_h 1 Nov 2019 10:01:40 -0000
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+$OpenBSD$
+
+Remove too broad #ifdef so that we also use modern code on arm.
+
+Index: makeint.h
+--- makeint.h.orig
++++ makeint.h
+@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ extern int errno;
+
No comments:
Post a Comment