Monday, December 30, 2019

Re: Rspamd: postfix/cleanup[6151]: warning: milter unix:public/rspamd_proxy.sock: can't read SMFIC_BODYEOB reply packet header: Undefined error: 0

On 2019/12/30 17:42, niav wrote:
> Am Mon, 30 Dec 2019 15:57:20 +0000
> schrieb Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org>:
>
> > On 2019/12/30 15:20, niav wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I've upgraded my mail server to OpenBSD -current and since then I
> > > have encountered a problem in connection with rspamd.
> > > Everytime I receive a mail the message gets rejected with the
> > > following lines in my /var/log/maillog:
> > > postfix/cleanup[67921]: warning: milter
> > > unix:public/rspamd_proxy.sock: can't read SMFIC_BODYEOB reply
> > > packet header: Undefined error: 0
> > >
> > > postfix/cleanup[67921]: 47mfQC0vLVzZ0f: milter-reject:
> > > END-OF-MESSAGE from mail.openbsd.org[199.185.178.25]: 4.7.1 Service
> > > unavailable - try again later;
> > > from=<owner-bugs+M32060=list=<my-domain>@openbsd.org>
> > > to=<<MAILADDRESS>> proto=ESMTP helo=<mail.openbsd.org>
> > >
> > > What further information do you need ? I'm more and more in trouble
> > > the longer this problem persists. Therefore I'd kiss you for a
> > > quick reply!
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Niav
> > >
> >
> > Generally it is useful to mention the version you're running now, the
> > previous working version, machine architecture etc, anything unusual
> > in the log for the program having the problem (i.e. rspamd here).
> >
> > In this case there's a fair chance that it might be the problem I
> > fixed in the port yesterday so try building from an up-to-date ports
> > tree before spending more time looking into it.
> >
>
> Hi,
> tried to compile the rspamd from ports. But the build fails with:
> /bin/sh: cannot create
> /usr/ports/pobj/ruby-2.6.5/fake-amd64/usr/local/lib/ruby/2.6/x86_64-openbsd/rbconfig.rb:
> No such file or directory

I don't have time to debug the build of dependencies right now, but you
can skip building most of them if you "pkg_add ragel"

>
> I issued the command: make package to build it.
>
> If I cannot get this one to compile right know I'd get it with the next
> snapshot anyway, correct ?

yep.

No comments:

Post a Comment