On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 09:42:49PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> `show-reverse-deps devel/libevent2' is huge, so I suppose this update is
> better tested in a bulk.
kmos' sparc64 bulk with this diff had not libevent2 related fallout.
OK?
Index: Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/libevent2/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -p -r1.17 Makefile
--- Makefile 29 Mar 2020 17:26:23 -0000 1.17
+++ Makefile 29 Mar 2020 19:28:32 -0000
@@ -2,17 +2,16 @@
COMMENT= event notification library
-V= 2.0.22
+V= 2.1.11
DISTNAME= libevent-$V-stable
PKGNAME= libevent-$V
-REVISION= 1
CATEGORIES= devel
HOMEPAGE= https://libevent.org/
-SHARED_LIBS+= event_core 1.1 # 6.9
-SHARED_LIBS+= event_extra 0.1 # 6.9
-SHARED_LIBS+= event_openssl 0.0 # 6.9
-SHARED_LIBS+= event_pthreads 0.0 # 6.9
+SHARED_LIBS+= event_core 2.0 # 7.0
+SHARED_LIBS+= event_extra 1.0 # 7.0
+SHARED_LIBS+= event_openssl 1.0 # 7.0
+SHARED_LIBS+= event_pthreads 0.0 # 7.0
# BSD
PERMIT_PACKAGE= Yes
@@ -26,6 +25,8 @@ CONFIGURE_STYLE=gnu
DEBUG_PACKAGES= ${BUILD_PACKAGES}
MAKE_FLAGS= RELEASE=""
+
+SEPARATE_BUILD =Yes
# Skip compatibility bits that conflict with libevent1
FAKE_FLAGS= LIBEVENT_LIBS_LA="libevent_core.la libevent_extra.la \
Index: distinfo
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/libevent2/distinfo,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.7 distinfo
--- distinfo 6 Jan 2015 21:28:05 -0000 1.7
+++ distinfo 29 Mar 2020 17:33:18 -0000
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-SHA256 (libevent-2.0.22-stable.tar.gz) = ccLEnwra2s/b5jMqNyw4z5yLeJW7c9q+qlPNzB1OH6M=
-SIZE (libevent-2.0.22-stable.tar.gz) = 854987
+SHA256 (libevent-2.1.11-stable.tar.gz) = plusYgLqjFYJ/Vx+SA5tJd5GfqGRfAgpDFIXUvFHKD0=
+SIZE (libevent-2.1.11-stable.tar.gz) = 1082234
Index: patches/patch-evutil_rand_c
===================================================================
RCS file: patches/patch-evutil_rand_c
diff -N patches/patch-evutil_rand_c
--- patches/patch-evutil_rand_c 6 Jan 2015 21:28:05 -0000 1.3
+++ /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
@@ -1,16 +0,0 @@
-$OpenBSD: patch-evutil_rand_c,v 1.3 2015/01/06 21:28:05 sthen Exp $
-OpenBSD does not need nor provide arc4random_addrandom anymore.
-And evutil_secure_rng_add_bytes is a bad API anyway.
---- evutil_rand.c.orig Mon Jan 5 15:17:40 2015
-+++ evutil_rand.c Mon Jan 5 23:01:59 2015
-@@ -171,10 +171,3 @@ evutil_secure_rng_get_bytes(void *buf, size_t n)
- ev_arc4random_buf(buf, n);
- }
-
--void
--evutil_secure_rng_add_bytes(const char *buf, size_t n)
--{
-- arc4random_addrandom((unsigned char*)buf,
-- n>(size_t)INT_MAX ? INT_MAX : (int)n);
--}
--
Index: patches/patch-include_event2_util_h
===================================================================
RCS file: patches/patch-include_event2_util_h
diff -N patches/patch-include_event2_util_h
--- patches/patch-include_event2_util_h 6 Jan 2015 21:28:05 -0000 1.2
+++ /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
@@ -1,26 +0,0 @@
-$OpenBSD: patch-include_event2_util_h,v 1.2 2015/01/06 21:28:05 sthen Exp $
---- include/event2/util.h.orig Mon Jan 5 15:17:40 2015
-+++ include/event2/util.h Mon Jan 5 23:01:59 2015
-@@ -690,22 +690,6 @@ int evutil_secure_rng_init(void);
- */
- int evutil_secure_rng_set_urandom_device_file(char *fname);
-
--/** Seed the random number generator with extra random bytes.
--
-- You should almost never need to call this function; it should be
-- sufficient to invoke evutil_secure_rng_init(), or let Libevent take
-- care of calling evutil_secure_rng_init() on its own.
--
-- If you call this function as a _replacement_ for the regular
-- entropy sources, then you need to be sure that your input
-- contains a fairly large amount of strong entropy. Doing so is
-- notoriously hard: most people who try get it wrong. Watch out!
--
-- @param dat a buffer full of a strong source of random numbers
-- @param datlen the number of bytes to read from datlen
-- */
--void evutil_secure_rng_add_bytes(const char *dat, size_t datlen);
--
- #ifdef __cplusplus
- }
-
No comments:
Post a Comment