Re: Update net/libsignal-protocol-c 2.3.2->3

On Sat, Mar 28 2020, Greg Steuck <greg@nest.cx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 9:29 AM Alex Holst <a@mongers.org> wrote:
>
>> > I'm looking for feedback about the trade-offs of such changes.
>> Hi. This seems like needless churn to me. Upstream should be nudged to
>> do a new release instead.
>>
>
> Done.
>
> The local patches got rolled in. Library version bump seems
> unnecessary based on the diff:
> https://github.com/signalapp/libsignal-protocol-c/compare/v2.3.2...v2.3.3

Looks good ports-wise, ok jca@

> make test:
>
> Test project /home/greg/ports/pobj/libsignal-protocol-c-2.3.3/build-amd64
> Start 1: test_curve25519
> 1/13 Test #1: test_curve25519 .................. Passed 1.56 sec
> Start 2: test_hkdf
> 2/13 Test #2: test_hkdf ........................ Passed 0.02 sec
> Start 3: test_ratchet
> 3/13 Test #3: test_ratchet ..................... Passed 0.04 sec
> Start 4: test_protocol
> 4/13 Test #4: test_protocol .................... Passed 0.05 sec
> Start 5: test_session_record
> 5/13 Test #5: test_session_record .............. Passed 0.04 sec
> Start 6: test_session_cipher
> 6/13 Test #6: test_session_cipher .............. Passed 0.44 sec
> Start 7: test_session_builder
> 7/13 Test #7: test_session_builder ............. Passed 0.40 sec
> Start 8: test_key_helper
> 8/13 Test #8: test_key_helper .................. Passed 0.02 sec
> Start 9: test_simultaneous_initiate
> 9/13 Test #9: test_simultaneous_initiate ....... Passed 1.94 sec
> Start 10: test_sender_key_record
> 10/13 Test #10: test_sender_key_record ........... Passed 0.03 sec
> Start 11: test_group_cipher
> 11/13 Test #11: test_group_cipher ................ Passed 2.20 sec
> Start 12: test_fingerprint
> 12/13 Test #12: test_fingerprint ................. Passed 0.21 sec
> Start 13: test_device_consistency
> 13/13 Test #13: test_device_consistency .......... Passed 0.04 sec
>
> 100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 13

--
jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE