Sunday, May 31, 2020

Re: Update: fonts/iosevka-fonts 2.3.3 -> 3.0.1

Hi all,

I'm indifferent as to whether we use subdirs or multi-packages, but I'd appreciate the update commit being separate from adding more families.

Perhaps we can do the update to 3.0.1 first?

(FWIW: I use only the term variant of this font -- that's the one I expected most users to want too)

Cheers

Edd Barrett 31 May 2020 08:12:56 Anthony J. Bentley <anthony@anjbe.name>:

> Hi Chris,
>
>
> Chris Rawnsley writes:
>
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> > > Personally I'd prefer a subdir over MULTI_PACKAGES also.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Do you mean like fonts/noto-*? I'm not that familiar with ports.
> >
> >
> > As Iosevka's releases happen in tandem across all families the subdir approach
> >
> > initially strikes me as a bit more laboursome to update many Makefiles. That is
> >
> > in contrast to say Noto where Emoji, CJK and main all have different release
> >
> > schedules. I'll happily give it a go, however.
> >
> >
> >
>
> It's not so laborsome. Subdirs can share any number of variables in
>
> common with each other, yet remain able to override them as needed.
>
> emulators/mupen64plus is an example of one that keeps the same
>
> version number between ports.
>
>
> --
>
> Anthony J. Bentley
>
>
>

No comments:

Post a Comment